/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6966612
You're just going to diss any artist that post their work without making any kind of reasonable judgement about said work
>wow your art sucks! Your argument against AI is invalid because your art is not good! You will be replaced pretty easily!
It's camping for an ad hominem, which is far more pathetic than using an ad hominem as is.
>>6966623
>OP is the creator of the original animu threads
That doesnt make him any less of a schizo.

I didnt really have issues picking my artist name, as I didnt think much of it at the time
>The color of love is rainbow according to 2hu, I wonder what the color of karma is...
>If I was a animal I'd probably be a cat, surly, lazy and bitter...
That's how I got it, it was just one of those dumb, borderline cringy usernames you just happened to stick to because people kept using it to address you.

My problem, though, is coming up with a clever artistic name as a graphic designer or professional in the art field, something that truly resonates with me as well makes me different than the others or some shit like that. Im wondering if it's even necessary as a designer for me to have a name so overly complicated other than what I already have.

>>6832782
Now I understand "overexposure" is an important element when it comes to people hating something. And I know this because Im kind of annoyed that Im seeing this anon everywhere...

Not to crab on the guy, I commend his ability to shill himself and garner commission money like an evangelic shepherd in Easter week. His art is certainly not my thing and I genuinely find the fetish focus to be jarring to look at, specially so often, but that is solely my own opinion and it should be taken like a grain of salt. Not my tea of cup, but kudos to him.

That said, OP, you could've DM'd the guy instead of making a thread, this is dumb...

>>6790429
>im too busy drawing instead of lurking on this shithole 24/7 so im not aware of these threads
My bad anon, it's just that the exact same questions are always being asked and ironically no one that asked seems to care about the answers or solutions presented, it's tiresome.
>>6792534
>What is even the point of posting on social-media at this point.
Acquire profit from said audience and/or appease the masses in an attempt to fulfill your desire for artistic expression to a public that cares, or some other things along the lines of both.
>But why care about any of tha-
You wanted a question, I gave you an answer.
>>6792714
Im tired of explaining why this doesnt work on the long term. Some anons really think they can make it by whoring themselves to other artists alone. You will never be anything other than "that one artist I followed because they made one fanart that I liked." Instead of whoring yourself to other people's OCs, why dont you try and make an OC that manages to hit the numbers?

>>6789954
I want to be mad at you fags, I really do, but most of the AI slop that has been posted lately are blondies, this one has lingerie too, I cant be mad when you're appeasing to my kinks like that.
I still dont welcome AI and I much rather have actual artists draw blondies themselves, that'd be infinitely better, but I dont discriminate a good looking blondie even if it's the most generic and souless thing possible.
>also
>another AI thread
Begone already

>>6769702
Yeah, but it's not only what people are willing to pay, but skill and demand are at play as well, if you have a consistently high traffic of clients, you can cut yourself some slack and increase prices just fine, can also do it if your skills allow you to because the clients can see the increase in quality.

Honestly, this whole thread is pretty useless, specially so with the loca schitzo jerking himself off with his mid-looking anime trash works. I'd give him any sort of credit if he had more to offer, but hell, he has nothing of interest in his art style and rendering.