/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6733054
>try to have a conversation
>anons incessantly move the goal post
>"waaaah ur wrong because how about this one? gotcha now"
>respond and at least try to bring the conversation forward
>"waaaaaaaah ur moving the goalpost ur schizo because [insert all the strawmen here] hehe i only deal in absolutes checkmate"
I really don't get it.
What kind of incentive do you have to go out of your way to be this retarded and dishonest?

>>5016994

>>4977533
>pyw
>post some likes screencap
>Exploiting this lowest common denominator is just not in my blood. I'll flip burgers before I prostitute my art to this point. Luckily, I don't have to
Are you being retarded on purpose?
You better not be.

>>4913574
You know i'm the one who's going to pick out your retirement home, right?
>>4913577
Apples and oranges, anon.
Drawing isn't the same as performing.
The point was that normies and autists are fucking insufferable faggots, who have forced the industry to shit out the same rehashed garbage because
>that's what people want to consume
leaving no space the artist
art should be enjoyed, not consumed
making work for consumption is the anti thesis to art

The whole "bitter" thing is just a thing retarded and delusional people say because by accepting the reality of others would mean to shatter their own illusions.
If i choose to pursue art for my own private enjoyment, is not up to discussion.

>>4880743
>every SUCCESSFUL person disagrees with your views
>THAT MUST MEAN YOUR WRONG LET ME EDUCATE YOU
peak cultist right there
Also
>barely any of his own work visible
>timeline is cluttered by RTs
>politicposting
>attentionwhoring this hard
I honestly don't even know who this guy is

>>4863638