/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6942549
yeah maybe you should, you sound retarded enough to buy into him.

>>6942552
it's really not hard to understand. i just want to be able to discuss it here. and believe it or not, i am from here and have been for a long time, even if i took a long break.
but your interpretation of things is very telling.
harrassing how? what am even i doing in your mind?

telling you something you don't want to hear? do you genuinely believe that this is your safe space? that the bubble shouldn't be challenged?
do you think i will "poison" other's minds?
once AI does become a thing in artist circles, will you blame me?
or was i just saying the obvious thing all along?

..yes. i do think artists lack perspective when it comes to AI.
the state of the discourse among artists when it comes to AI is ABSYMAL. and that's part of the reason i wanted to push back. and objectively that's really all i'm doing.

>>6938218
>for example can you achieve an interesting composition?
what do you mean?
the way it works is it uses
1. the prompt
2. the image input, if there is one
3. further inputs (like pic related for example)
and you can adjust how tightly the AI should be guided by each of these.
so if there is any visual input, like in the videos posted, the composition is mostly what the user gives it.
of course you can loosen the setting too, which will give the AI more freedom.

>can you guide the viewers sight through your scene?
wat?