/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6295506
You're the same guy who posts real art and tries to pass it off as AI generated.
The same idiot who posted pic related thinking he won not understanding the anon was calling you out with an acronym of the artist name, right?

the level of cope and exaggeration that a lot of /ic/ uses is cringe as fuck.

i've posted a number of non-ai art pieces to ai threads and always, some anon will jump on it saying 'why it looks like shit' and how the ai did such a bad job.

lets be real, fixing the eye in the OP would take 5 minutes tops. shitting on stuff that ai puts out doesn't suddenly make you better, you're just the same old crab in the same old bucket. if you really want to stay relevant, play to your own strengths that Ai can't do. pretending actually appealing images are shit isn't going to help. if you want to shit on what ai can't do, sure go for it, but to pretend it's strengths are shit.. well that's just retarded.