/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6942439
>>6942436
you meme but it's just the truth.
it doesn't matter what the AI specifically does. it only matters that you are letting it do it, for efficiency reasons, for technical, for skill reasons, whatever it is. it's a tool.
i'm just telling you how it will work conceptually.

>>6942446
oh yeah they're totally out to get you.
AI was made to destroy artists. everything revolves around you, you, you.
did you see chess or go tards play victim like this when AI came into their field?
>these damn evil researchers! they just want to destroy our game!

>>6938149
You're only seeing a fraction of what it can really do.
you can make it follow your input much more closely if you want to. there are tons of knobs to tweak or inputs to add.

i've said it before and i'll say it again. people are really only starting to figure out how they want to use AI. it'll take easy access for artists to truly accept this. for now it'll only be enthusiasts who bother with it, and most of them aren't conventional artists.

>>6938162
i mean if the input will be that sloppy, then you kinda have to keep the denoise high.
but i can imagine adjusting it dynamically.
a lot of AI workflows could end up being iterative imo. as in you make stuff and loop it into the AI over and over again, taking away, adding things and recombining all the time.

it's hard to envision how it'll really work in the future.