/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2238283
"Post all the pics that you look to for inspiration"
Your opinion is irrelevant and baseless. For one thing typical as it may be that doesn't change the fact that that very statement means it's top quality all the same which leads to my second point. His work inspires me and that's why I posted it in the inspirational art thread. Whether you agree with me or not does not matter because what inspires me wont inspire you.

TLDR I can like whatever the fuck I want bitch. Typical calarts student "stuff"... what a faggot.

>>2212872
>directors for 3D animations seem to rely too much on the ability to move the camera around, where as with 2D the directors focus more on composition.
That's a lie. you can scrub the frames in this animation so go ahead and do that. There is nothing in this or in "most good 3d directors" films that relies on anything as generalised an moronic as your statement.
>Then why are you saying that 3D is better than 2D
Read my posts and you'll find this ill informed answer at least two fold. 2d inherently CANNOT be as good as 3d unless the animators effectively spend decades producing what can be done in 3d in 3 years. That or spend a fortune on an army to farm the animation out in less. I'm talking handrawn animated backrounds here. Because That's the only way to get the types of shots that the modern audience is used to these days.