/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5000609
Shexyo is still not a tracer, faggot.
No matter what your e-celebs say.

>>4989186
Stating a dogmatic narrative as an argument, isn't an argument.
>loli is kids thus loli bad
This anon said it best>>4989167
Victimless crimes aren't crimes.

Are you done spamming the site with your shitty threads, nigger?

>>4977580
>implying
I'm stating facts.
This is the market and this is the demand.
Calling others pieces of shit or brainless consumers because they don't consume what you want them to consume is pathetic and
>Do you honestly believe everyone else is this self-centered?
you're showing me how self-centered you are right now.
Why does something have to be of lesser value?
Lesser value compared to what? Art you like? Art that doesn't depict the nude body or sexual act?
You can't give art a fixed value because art is valued by the people who consume it, and by that standard, it's non-porn that is of lesser value but that's just semantics.
If you were a moral person you wouldn't try to impose your morals upon others.
If coomers are wrong, why don't you try to convince them by being reasonable?
Why don't you try to convince them through your art?
But instead you're here, complaining about a boogeyman that you claim has no effect on you or your work, but are proving otherwise with your words.
Put your money where your mouth is and post your work.
Convince me that it's the coomers fault why non-porn artist can't get enough exposure.