/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3727940
*you're
>>3727950
>Why do you have to force yourself into every thread
Because I like the idea that posting jokes upsets you mostly. You are literally covered in soup my dude.

>>3725373
Only thing that really matters is time. You're wasting your time trolling this thread waiting for responses. And then you respond asap essentially just to stress how useless you are. You've spent how much of your monday on this?

Like I'm using this time to write and reflect about things I'd thinking about anyway, structured around my interactions with you. This is how I like to spend non-productive time. Keeps the mind focused. But you're stupid and lazy and disingenuous. You're your stereotype of a nigger. Concepts like focus and production clearly aren't things that matter to you people.
>>3725374
>damn that is vague lol.
Yeah check out the entire last thread. Like are you familiar with koans at all? Think of it as that maybe? There are a LOT of ways to talk about what "time is entropy" means. The application of how you interpret it is kind of part of the goof!
>So there is a difference between ideals and reality and that is... entropy...?
Yeah kind of. But also not really.
>This tells me nothing I didn't already know.
Learn more things?
>worst basic gestalt I've ever had.
It is the basic gestalt. All existence is part of an explosion of heat energy hurling through space. It's ALL entropy. Time is fake. Free will is an illusion. Everything you do is irreversible. Nothing you do matters.
>Can you explain what it is or not
It's like saying "so it goes" when something shitty happens. Or you get older. Or you mess up. Or you get better. Or anything in the past influences anything happening now. Or anything. It's a statement of reality.

Nothing is perfect
And anything is better
Time is entropy

>>3717350
>I find it strange that you claim to be here to get crits, but if people say your concept is incomprehensible to the point of suspecting there is nothing there,
yeah "how to paint entropy" is a complex meme. this has been good workshopping.
>you are consistently unwilling to be even a little open to the smallest chance that we might have a point.
Like there are a lot of ways that I think "entropy" is reflected in my approach. I jump from painting to painting applying paint as it's mixed to as much shit until I'm just brushing painty water on a new canvas. Starting new shit to continue an idea on when it comes to brush technique or color mixing, and then spiraling out into a bunch of other shit and then working back and applying the new things I've learned to the painting I was hung up on in the first place, is part of my "time is entropy" approach.
>We have to insist on explanations for your ideas and when pressured, you give these super defensive obscure connections to orbiting planets and timespace
Yeah everything is entropy! We're riding along in an entropic system. All human action is entropy! And if time is entropy and entropy is expended heat energy, capturing ideas on canvas is a form of timekeeping. There are so many different memes for how time is entropy and why that's a mantra for creative production!
>I mean, why aren't you trying your hardest to make us understand what you're trying to say
because for one thing it isn't being made clear what you're not understanding. Most of it has been aimless negation with no attempt made to help me help you. It's all been a bunch of "nuh uh."
> instead it is we who have to drag explanations and ideas out of you, like you know it doesn't stand daylight.
Like this is a big concept. It speaks to a lot of concepts and applications. The ultimate porpoise of "how to paint entropy" is more about daily behavioral conditioning and how to develop a motivational framework to do work and harness time.

>>3652871
like I just want everyone to be able to feel the sense of huzzah manic satifaction that I got from how that painting is playing right now.

It was months of anxiety and then it felt like I goofed it and then I just kept working and even though I goofed a bunch of things it's still SO feelsgood to have gotten this far.

Time is entropy,
I'm gonna live forever.
We ride eternal.

I was going to kill myself at the Van Gogh museum in December 2016. idk if it happened or not.

>>3589791
>you're throwing what you've been accused of right back at the source
Well no I said it first >>3589619 . You were throwing it back at me. And again, I'm motivated to respond because I literally have to as part of my meme experiment rules for the past few weeks. You're motivated to respond because you clearly have some kind of shit to prove to yourself.
>the cognitive dissonance is all over the place with your schtick
Yeah it's built into the structure. Nothing is done until the race is over. I schedule intentional mistakes so that I don't have any hang ups about failing. I'm racing Van Gogh and incepted thatI'm dying to create and enforce extrinsic motivators on myself. I do it publicly for a bunch of ananymous assholes so that when I say I'm going to do something I feel anxiety about wanting to do it to avoid sniveling retards like you having something to shitpost about.
>you are basically bathing in dissonance.
idk if you really know what you're talking about. You should read mistakes were made (but not by me). Great book. Will help you a lot.
>>3589793
>yup, you have a way out of every argument.
No I'm just good at, or at least enjoy arguing. It's the best means by which I encode and think about stuff. The reason you get frustrated is that you don't offer ANYTHING, you just talk shit. And when asked to re-clarify what you're trying to say you act like an asshole. I was patient and we were rational when you were actually doing this shit but now it's just flailing around.
>If it's shit, it's on purpose.
or it's just accepted. Time is entropy. wabi sabi brah.
>If you're an asshole, they deserve it.
you deserve it.
>if you get owned, it's the self loathing.
idk if get "owned" really. I set out to be embarrassed. It's all embarrassing.
>Coat all of that in a thick layer of irony and "absurdism"
I did. It's great.
>and you're more or less bullet proof.
exactly. highly recommended.

>>3558427
>You definitely don't have friends here if that's what (you)re implying
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koJlIGDImiU

>>3544965
>I like your stuff ironically. Let me be clear, my enjoyment does not come from a place of sincerity.
What a contemptuous nigger. Why do you think anyone would care about the things you make pretend to like?
>But hey at least I get something out of it right.
Bet you'd "get something" out of being gangraped by a football team too.

>>3542739
>If you're aware you're bad why are you ooze with a sense of smug superiority in every sentence?
Are you sure you don't have inferiority issues? I'm just stream of conscious righting. Dictated but not red.
>Why do you belittle everyone who dares to use a tablet?
Mostly out of spite for the amount of shit people give me for grids. I don't mean to belittle anyone other than to maybe inspire them to brach out and do different shit out of spite. My favorite teacher in high school was a confrontational asshole that would trigger kids into doing better just to spite him.
>And why do you feel the need to spam several of your unrelated paintings in every single thread?
Running out the clock till I get to August mostly. And mostly just out of spite.
>I have never seen a more insecure person on this website.
You certainly have. Post a picture of your dick faget.

>>3529566
>I plat videogames nonstop
you should stop

>>3525862
>why do autists always make dumb assumptions?
I was asking actual questions though. That's the opposite of making assumptions.
>you are literally Illastrat 2.0
he said i wasn't tho
>are you saying you art is interesting?
sure. normals are generally easily impressed.
>your whole shtick depends on the creativity of the photographers
I mean most of them are going to be sourced from a video, so it'd be videographers. but sure there's literally no difference between racking focus and portrait painting with acrylic.

And yeah basically all of it is unattributed copyright infringement.

>You are just replicating someone else's work, just slap a filter on photoshop and print it, the outcome is the same.
again you're highlighting the fun part like it's a negative.
>doesnt mean they will pick a napkin from the trash and sell it for 5 mil.
why not?
>Are you expecting anyone to spend big bucks on your art?
yeah totally.
>Did you take any of the photos you are using as reference?
nope. peasant painting period.
>Did you check if they are copyrighted?
Basically every single one of them is from a copyrighted source.

>>3509375
>you just reek of millenial faggot who thinks hes better than everyone
most of us do. that's kind of the point. and kind of why the parallel with Van Gogh is so relevant now. We're in a very similar situation with the internet revolution as we were when he was kind of passively protesting the industrial revolution.

you reek of someone that would like to feel better than everyone but makes no effort to justify those feelings