/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6702220
>bitching about people "lying to you",
Ah I didn't mean to actually offend anyone with that comment, just some partly self-deprecating banter. I apologize, lets be friends, hand-san!
>you should think about maybe rewording your posts to be less vague.
Isn't the point of asking for critique to get someone to tell you what you can't see yourself?
That was literally my first time ever drawing an unclothed body too. I am here setting a baseline for myself, and trying to find everything I could improve on. But I know my biased eyes wont be able to spot everything.

Hell, did I even improve on it? Haven't got a single word of feedback here.

>>6702303
As a self-described elitist I agree with you. A lot of the artists I follow and love never draw any full body poses at all. But what they have is style, and adorable faces.

>>6702321
Ahh finally,
>even if it’s a little stiff.
This is something I seem to always have trouble with, and I just fail to figure out how to fix it.

Anyway, about eyes, the first >>6690179 marisa I decided to leave lightly shaded with sharp (difficult to position) pupils because I thought the contrast in color between her clothes (the hat) and the eyes had something interesting going on.
With this pic I just worked on the anatomy/proportions/pose and just copied the shading in interest of time, since this is going to be last one I draw in this pixelated oekaki (I bought a tablet!!). But I forgot to consider that this one has no hat so the logic for leaving the eyes so light isn't there. And you're absolutely right they look dead af in this one. This actually bothers me so much now.
Now, I dont like your eyes at all, but heres a Remu from couple weeks back, there I had less experimental eyes >>/ic/thread/6671817#p6672324..
>nd the back of her skull is too small
Ah I knew it but I thought I could get away with it, I guess not (i REALLY didn't want to redraw the hair AGAIN).
And good edit on the leg.
And thank you!