/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3656192
>Completly false. Half the threads on this entire board and the "Loomis is a lie!" meme prove exactly the opossite.

Not my fault more than half this board has very low intelligence. It explains what you need to focus on if you want to get in to commercial illustration in the very first few pages. Loomis never, not once, told you to somehow take his book as gospel.

The only lie here is Robertson doing a dick move by calling it "how to draw" just so that his book catches massive results in Amazons SEO when weeb children are looking for H2D books and stumble across his book. His book is completely unnecessary for anime girls.
>If you don't realize the difference between 50's american illustration and todays illustration,
I'm sorry, did the fundamentals change dramatically within the last 50 years or are we still learning pic related?

>>3603290
They kick our asses there.