/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6987698
he's not me anon. you tard.
as for me, i AM trying to show AI off.
because truthfully, i want artists better than me to pick this up and find better workflows and develop this field more. (now that i think about it, this is the real reason for my actions here)
but most artists in general are discouraged thanks to the lies that anti-tards tell them.

>>6987705
no point in finishing them. they're just proof of concepts started with very haphazard starting sketches. it's more about trying to see what can be done than the art itself.
let's be real here. you're just intellectually dishonest when you say i have to finish them for you to see the point. i don't need to finish >>6985836 for you to be able to tell.

but hey, like i said, i don't care about convincing you dishonest fucks anymore. if i show more of what AI can be used for, people will naturally grow curious.

>>6987714
that's fair enough.
you can learn from it i think. these generations sometimes can be like literal redlines.

>>6987720
so what? according to you, it's still "cheating" when they use it, no? except you let it go in their case.
why? because they're good. and their results are good. and their results would be good even without it. and yet they still use it. they "cheat".
AI will be like that as well.
/home/tat/Videos/Screencasts/hogan.webm