[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.3891640 [View]
File: 34 KB, 426x341, 212.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3891640

>>3890829
>Glasses
>Cheongsam
>Sacrum hugging panties
It's like this man knows all my fetishes

>> No.3348077 [View]
File: 33 KB, 426x341, 1519412575001 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3348077

>> No.3345197 [View]
File: 33 KB, 426x341, 212.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3345197

>>3342810
>>3342829
>>30 heads thicc
so she can birth 29 kids at once?

>> No.3249388 [View]
File: 33 KB, 426x341, noope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3249388

>>3249383
>lolol i don't think these are amazing.
ok, so let me summarize.

you shit on abstract art, being money laundering. you create your own abstract art pieces, "because it's soo easy! anyone can do it!". you are asked to submit it to an actual gallery, because obviously, you are proud of your works and confident that they are on a par with Jackson Pollock and Basquiat, so there's nothing standing in your way to get them out there. then you pretend, it's the first time you posted in 2017 >>3249382 when you've clearly been spamming shit this whole week, even referencing your previous threads ("Art was a mistake") >>3239599
then you go on to say that you "don't think they are amazing". huh! didn't you just claim they are as good as Basquiat? and finally, you "just wanted reactions" confirming ---> >>3249381

that about right?

>> No.3249387 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 33 KB, 426x341, noope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3249387

>>3249383
>lolol i don't think these are amazing.
ok, so let me summarize.

you shit on abstract art, being money laundering. you create your own abstract art pieces, "because it's soo easy! anyone can do it!". you are asked to submit it to an actual gallery, because obviously, you are proud of your works and confident that they are on a par with Jackson Pollock and Basquiat, so there's nothing standing in your way to get them out there. then you pretend, it's the first time you posted in 2017 >>3249382 when you've clearly been spamming shit this whole week, even referencing your previous threads ("Art was a mistake") 3239599
then you go on to say that you "don't think they are amazing". huh! didn't you just claim they are as good as Basquiat? and finally, you "just wanted reactions" confirming ---> 3249381

that about right?

>> No.3247818 [View]
File: 33 KB, 426x341, noope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3247818

>>3247812
>>>3247800 (You)
>noope
>(poah, grad no geschafft! disaster averted)

>> No.3088508 [View]
File: 33 KB, 426x341, swEAT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3088508

>>3087946

>> No.2973924 [View]
File: 34 KB, 426x341, 1468865224873.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2973924

>>2973334
That's pretty hot.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]