/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4479124
you need to know anatomy before trying to stylize the body, idk how is that not obvious, stylization doesnt mean i make my own rules if you separate the ribacage that hight and make that kind of blob shape at the end it looks like theres a huge empty gap with the pelvis the lats fill that void and they are attached way higher, you made her abs wide as fuck i mean they can be wide but not that wide the legs have no form they look like logs, the knees are the worst , theres a gap between the muscles (quads) and the calves, your calves in the right leg is way past the knee level thats not anatomically correct that's not how you stylize thats just your poor anatomy, the elbows and the muscles surrounding it like the biceps, forearm are wrongly attached you literally guessed there you don't even know how does these muscles attach, the forearm muscle on the right arm doesn't overlap the elbow bone that high and the bicep does't make that fold unless it were fat and on the left arm the elbow is coming from one side pointing almost at the viewer that shit aint stylizing.

pic.in the top the colored areas/muscles remain in the same place it's just the size that changes in them however the ribcage is larger and so the pelvis and arms if make then fatter it will look off the legs can be made more thicker but the pelvis should be wider for that or it will like your pic its like they have a rubber band around, so you see how things change differently you need to find the balance but you don't even know the anatomy that well yet.you probably wont even notice half the shit i spoke so the best you can do is use a ref and compare, problem is that depending on how stylized you are looking for you might not find it or it could be a bad stylizitation and it will fuck you instead since you cant't recognize normal anatomy.