/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3565332
>>3565360
No blog yet.
Im not confident enough to post my original works yet so I only post in these my style your style threads
Thanks for the yous though.

>>3514450
ok but do you work or are you a 30 years old boomer neet?

>>3481326
How do I gain any following and attract at least someone?

>>3456628
>get super hungry while cooking
>furiously eat most of products before the meal is done
>don't want to cook anymore
>put leftovers in the fridge
>forget about it for months

>>3430721
1 from myself.

>>3370404
>tfw i've come to accept im a retarded brainlet
>makes improving my art difficult
>why bother

>>3302389
Yes, shit anatomy, the torso is 1/3 bigger than it should be and the left arm is tiny (there's a proportion problem there). Bland oversaturated colors and boring composition. It also looks like shitty anime sex dolls as usual. But you know what? People don't care. They will still masturbate to this shit and give $ to sakimi because they have shit taste or believe in the "muh style" meme. Because it still has zettai ryouiki in it so it's passable. Because despite her middle of the road artistic skills, Sakimi is an excellent businessman and is very smart about what she does.
You should feel bad for posting that on /ic/. Now there's going to be another debate between redlining crabs hating on the success of the artist and sakimi shills who are going to defend everything about this wholly unappealing artwork that entirely relies on its good rendering to get by only because they respect the money she makes. There's nothing about Sakimi's art outside of the way she markets it. Stop these threads, none here to improve cares.