>lol. just because it learns like a human doesn't mean i think it is human, or sentient.
it doesn't learn like a human at all are you retarded or don't understand how algorithms and machines work in general?
work on having images tagged with descriptions, the user makes the inputs, the program looks for tags, applies filters and warps images with a given seed taken from a a library of seeds available to it and following its directive, until an output is reached.
It isn't even aware of what it is doing, reproducing or replicating, it is simply following orders and what it is programmed to do.
eg. just because something can look human doesn't mean it is.
it also doesn't have emotions experiences biases that would influence the work as such nothing it produces matters or means anything it's a sponge if you feed it with enough data it will copy that thing perfectly.
>I don't want to be pessimistic, but shouldn't this focus on the mass theft of copyrighted art?
yes it's a fucking legal nightmare produced by big techs hubris it almost makes me think they engineered the crisis intentionally so hey can sell us incredibly intrusive and privacy destroying solutions.
the only option i see that is realistic is forcing stable fagution and other companies shilling this shite to go open source and reveal there datasets to the public any copyrighted material will be DMCA'd by an algorithm similar to YouTube a dickish thing to do but fuck them they laid there bed now they should lie in it.