/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3239516
>not even here will you be able to find consensus.

I am not looking for a consensus. Please read my sentences carefully.

My argument against you is that everyone should be entitled to their own perspective when criticizing art. I am also allowed to be critical of an artist's perspectives if I don't find it interesting. You're saying people are closed-minded because they don't see it from the "correct" perspective even after those people understand the artist's motives, which so happens to be a perspective that always praises any art in existence. That in itself is closed-minded because you are only considering one side of the perspectives.

You still have yet to make any logically sound argument as to why you believe the "correct" perspective in critiquing art is the one that always praises the art.

>>2622584
This.

And: does anyone have anything on pastelles?