/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3271011
This is very cute and has a lot of nice things going for it. Good line quality, expressive characters, a bit of story telling, it's pretty nice.

But >>3271026 is right, they are very stiff. For a few reasons
>Every character's pose is perfectly symmetrical, their arms and legs are doing the same thing.
>Their arms and legs are also either completely straight or bent near perfectly at 90 degrees, very exact and straight angles that kill gesture.
>no contraposto
>There chins, sternums, and pelvises are all perfectly centered and not twisted any sort of way
>Their backs are all completly straight. Girl on the left is tilting a little forward at the pelvis but her back isn't bending at all.

I'm a little suspicious that these are traced Design Dolls. Having worked with it myself they all seem a little too close to the starting T-Pose but having the pelvis dropped a little which also auto bends the legs, having the arms bent or put onto one part of the body or another, and very similar proportions. DD is a helpful tool but adding gesture to your poses will make your work 1000% better.

It's obvious you can do really good work but give a little more thought to avoiding these sorts of stiff cliches in the future.

>>2638963
hey, thats pretty good, but im not sure if your camera sucks or if you put some kind of filter on the picture, or did you just smudge it weird like a mothafucka?!?!?

>>2621781