/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

-===- MECHA TIER LIST -=====-
Presentation | Design | Fundamentals

Presentation/Effort
5. Top of the club! clearly not rushed tier, all parts thought out, maybe even portfolio worthy
4. Decent but could be pushed much further tier, Use your time more wisely and try bringing it up side by side with industry portfolios to compare. Possibly lacks consistency in presentation.
3. Rushed but everything still considered tier, Maybe don’t procrastinate next time anon? It’s your future on the line after all!
2. Extremely rushed, low effort. You do not deserve the badge.
Parts left unfinished. You do not deserve the badge.

Both 1 and 2 are getting nominated for tribunal

Design
5. All parts considered, function, shape design, color etc. meets the criteria for a well thought out design. Appealing aesthetics.
4. All parts considered, function, shape design, color etc. meets the criteria for a well thought out design. Not so appealing aesthetics.
3. Seems to be aware of what design is. Rough around the edges but keep at it, you’re on the right track!
2. What does it do tier. Absolutely no idea what the purpose of your mech is. Poorly thought out designs. Care to share the backstory for your mechs?
1. Plagarism tier. Yes we can tell, maybe try some critical thinking next time around.

Fundamentals
5. Powerful, diligent in your studies or are an old man who has drawn for a century or in a past life.
4. Getting there! General idea of all of the fundamentals, keep at it.
3. You did your best but it fell short. Hopefully this challenge has shown you where to focus, or what to learn about next!
2. Seems to lack awareness of the existence of certain fundamentals or standards. Also reserved for low effort higher skill.
New to drawing. Good job tackling something so huge this early on!