/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3345692
Joking aside, >>3339706 is an overstatement of Craig's relevance on the cultural scale, but choosing to zero in on his career as a cog in the production pipeline for the entertainment industry as if that at all encompasses his significance as an individual is short-sighted and ignorant as all hell (but this is /ic/ after all). Rather than identify him as the "godfather" of digital art, it would be better to specify digital painting, and that's an important distinction.

I don't want to contend the point of his overall cultural relevance because even I think he's not particularly significant on a scale as grand as that, but he is a colossal influence on the entirety of digital painting and cementing it's viability in various industries. Also this little 400 something paged pdf has probably contributed more to the people occupying our small little nook in the world than anyone in this thread (probably board), including me, ever will.