/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3283274

>see, you're not representing the facts faithfully. The usual tard that doesn't like modern art and is extremely vocal about his opinions, doesn't actually know anything about the subject, but acts on his own false arrogance to dismiss the entire thing.

That's still his own opinion. There is nothing objectively perfect that ties all pieces of modern/contemporary art just because they are called "modern art" or "contemporary art". If the properties of paint or the act of painting does not appeal to someone, then it doesn't appeal to them. No amount of art history and visiting modern/contemporary art museums will change their minds.

I have seen good arguments against modern/contemporary art. Most people defending modern/contemporary art seem to ignore them and go after the idiots because they can't resist the bait.