/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2876154
oh, art and the concept of goodness are objective now. that's very good to know. because if people can't use pure logic and science to explain to you why a work of art qualifies as "good", then it's le emperor's new clothes. you can find loads of resources online if you want explanations for why people appreciate his work.

here are a few of my own observations of the work ITT
>>2876139
I dig the graphic style and bold use of outline
>>2876137
the solid, simplified cylindrical forms are very pleasing, they have a great sense of weight, especially with the high contrast semi-outlines (seen best on the two touching arms in the top left) that is reminiscent of cezanne
>>2876135
the pale, sickly colors give a creepy vibe, playful brushstrokes in the background contrast nicely with the more controlled figure.

What are the objective measurements of goodness? Share the criteria with the group.

>>1814323

>>1796690
>this was blown open years ago
>said some random guy on the internet
k sure

>>1744501
keep believing conspiracy theories