/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4066078
Honestly, how DOES Araki do it? Itagaki as well. Their art looks extremely unique and unlike any other manga out there, yet you know it's still made by a nip and is still manga. Why is that so?

>tfw been coming here and occassionally doing practice from stuff by Loomis but halfassed it since all the content looks scary to grasp and understand
>see very slow and little progress
its strange, normally id feel down about not getting that far since summer 2016, but i remember i used to draw like once a week or start something and abandon it.

who else is semi-exempt from the "git gud in X amount of years" meme?

Is it a good idea to post your work on social media if you're having a hard time being interested in what you're doing?
Or should you actually enjoy doing it in your own time before posting it anywhere?

>>3487639
>renaissance artists were just cartooning on a sophisticated level

That has to be the most succinct and accurate description I've ever read.

>>3485972
I don't even know how anyone could get off on that. Could you even imagine how awkward sex or just living in general would be for the poor woman? At that stage it's just elephantiasis of the mammaries.

do you really need to sacrifice everything to git gud? because logo design is also calling my attention

>>3336572
well is it any good tho? im from denmark and even tho education is free, its just not that good, or at least not very professional. Wish i could study in US.

>>3321957
>2018

theres still people out there not having a online backup?
where do you live? in caves?

Has anyone in the history of /ic/ ever posted their work?