/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

op here. I have nothing against porn I just want to find more independent sfw artists to follow

I wish I could draw as much porn as some of you. I just can't focus at all looking at so much bussy tho

>>4689736
This work is incredible on so many levels. The raw emotion, the storytelling, the technical skill... It's what I strive towards.

There's a lot I like, but none as much as this.

How to achieve a traditional look while painting digitally? Or as close as possible

>>4531218
she thinks loomis is a fucking joke for retarded burgers

Round 2. Give me your (you)s

>>4460530
what if i want to draw most of it myself, i think it will be faster that way anyway and i just need someone with better eyes to look at my work maybe 1-2 times a week and fix it or tell me how to make it better

if they wanna get more involved then i can give them percentage of the profits once the comic is on market

OR maybe i should just pitch this to an actual publisher but my shit's so inappropriate i cant picture anyone accepting it

This one never fails to get a (you)

Would you say Pic related has soul? It doesn't fit /ic/'s usual definition, but give me one reason why it doesn't have soul

>>4398020
That's because pieces that are colorful and stylized tend to be more expressive and emotive than realistic drawings. You can still do a realistic piece and be very expressive, but unfortunately most realistic pieces aren't. Pic related is a good example IMO