/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4074282
>It does not tell me what percent of lgbt have HIV.
I stopped arguing with you several posts above, but here is the full article you won't read
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805037/
By the way it also says that the specific act of shagging another man in the bum carries a greater risk of HIV transmission
>The biology of anal sex, the gut tropism of HIV-1,74 and the practices and behaviours associated with anal sex, might at least partly explain the high transmission efficiency of HIV infection for this practice. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of HIV transmission risks in anal sex reported a 1·4% per-act probability (95% CI 0·2–2·5) of transmission for anal sex and a 40·4% per-partner probability (6·0–74·9).Per-act probabilities did not differ for MSM or heterosexual anal sex. The 1·4% per-act probability is roughly 18-times greater than that which has been estimated for vaginal intercourse.This review also noted that per-partner risks for infection were similar for people reporting exclusive unprotected receptive anal intercourse and both unprotected receptive and insertive anal intercourse— common behavioural patterns for most MSM worldwide. Only self-reporting of exclusive unprotected insertive anal intercourse had lower, but still substantial, per-partner risks: 21·7% (0·2–43·3).
>Our modelling outputs suggest that even substantial behaviour change, such as reductions in extra-primary partnerships, would not reduce transmission frequency enough to control HIV incidence in MSM networks.