/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6526422
i am right.

>>6518038
nope he funded laion as well

>>6300219
it's because all the resources that were left over after covid are being redirected to AI art rather than whatever the fuck caiac19 was doing

>>6256697
i mean emad scooped up all my data anyway and made it open source for everyone, how kind! definitely nothing evil about all this, nope! stableAI are da widdle good guys only backed by amazon and the UN, just a widdle start up with over 50 employees and billions of dollars down the drain and tied up in crypto and nft bullshit

>cheering for acceleration of disruptive globohomo technology
Hmm I wonder who could be supporting the UN's collaborators, surely there are only /ic/bros in this thread?

Artists should really stop crying and coping or going off a deep end on some 80s sci-fi philosophical debates ,instead find some angles to put healthy boundaries around this new tech.

Entire industries just sit and cry while everything goes up in flame because some Pajeets want to pull a fast one on everyone. Partnered with Amazon doesn't mean he answer directly to Jeff Bezos and be immuned to legal repercussions.

>>6254334
here is my schizo mindmap about where this is all going.