/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3838734
More like
>i'll start in an hour
hour later
>i'll start in an hour
etc

>>3798161
Apart from the weed part this is highly relevant

>all art is equal therefore every level of work is to be evaluated by the lowest common denominator of opinion.

ART IS ONLY ABOUT THE FINAL PRODUCT.
MACHINES CAN MAKE PICTURES.
THEREFORE ART IS RIP.

fucking high schoolers. there has yet to be a coherent novel made by computer algos and it doesn't get much easier than text.

>>3326543
>Van Gogh was not successful
>one of the greatest artist in history
>world-wide fame
>amazing work; influenced artists and non-artists even upto this day
>amazing life; powerhoused through extreme emotional fits for art and life, turning it into tons and tons of original paintings, all in a short period, despite everyone hating on him for being too modern for modern.
>he wasn't successful because he didn't make the goi goi bank.

all these bullshit grids and elaborate methods when all op has to do is take a box-shaped object on his desk and rotate it. do you kids collaborate ahead of time or do the schools just make you this dumb nowdays?

>>3175650
art isn't taken for anything you arrogant pleb. it is used in nearly every niche of human life. even mathematicians use the term. and all of these uses are more or less correct. you're just some fuckwit that prolly prefers traditional art and decided to act on some self assigned false authority to decide what is or isn't """"art"""". i'm out of this thread.

>>3060864
>>3060885
>start doing sketches and upload everything, even deeply experimental horrible creations
>lose followers
>ask around
>>people will judge you on your worst piece
>realize the problem is systemic and not local to artists or their preferences