/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6255016
>It was a hypothetical
Thus you aid my previous point.
I would still have the same hypothetical answer.
If it's an hypothetical, you can't apply absolute realism to it.
Now say how hypothetical scenarios have to follow real events all the time.
>despite acknowledging it was a stupid response
Where? That's literally what you made up to keep going on being retarded.
>if you can't concede
Why? You're wrong and dishonest on top of that.
>You're essentially just telling everyone to accept this is happening and to not care
That's not what i'm saying.
That's what you have been saying the whole time because you can't refute any of my points except if you strawman anything i said of if you go off on absolute inane claims.
>Also you missed the point that it felt like things could be as bad as a doomsday event; so simply saying "nah strongmen" means nothing to me.
I got your point and i gave you the answer in good faith.
Just going into an extreme scenario and then pulling
>but everyone dies so you're wrong
proving that you're arguing in bad faith and then going
>but it was an hypothetical
Thus contradicting yourself.
>talk and action are two different things
I'm not going to give anyone handouts.
Someone that lives on handouts, always expects them.
>You're opinions are already formed and inflexible and you won't acknowledge anything else.
Give me a good argument that convinces me instead of throwing insults hoping you'll "win" the discussion by virtue of accusing the other of being the bad guy.
I'm not saying anything wrong, you're just irrational.
>Incredibly inconsistent anon
No it's not.
Good times create weak people.
If i plant trees, future people will take those trees for granted and they will become entitled; pushing weakness as virtue and calling anyone with strength, selfish.
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day, teach a man how to fish and he can feed himself.
>waah waah go fuck yourself waaah
You are a slave to your memes.

>>6143600
>Mask
>Picrel

>>5202168
>accusing
>shaming
>coping, seething
Nah, you're wrong.
Fuck women.

>>5152646
>no u

>>5111427
alright, let's dissect this garbage
>Have you ever actually lived with a woman besides your mother?
Implying failed adulthood. Typical feminine shaming strategy.
>In every dating experience I've had I've always been the one to have to do literally all the chores.
Me. Me. Me. Unable to stay objective on the topic. Their own perceived reality is seen as absolute truth, thus; "women are unable to fathom worlds beyond their own reflection." because they're self-absorbed cunts.
>Men will rot in their own filth
Quickly shifting the blame from themselves to make an argument.
Since they're the ones standing above those they talk down to, they believe they're right by simply "being better than others".
>Get some more female friends
Social shaming because it has no real arguments.
>This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
Unwillingness to actually tackle this because it is a very valid and relevant point. Probably guilty of it, thus avoiding any real discussion.
>Do you know any real human beings that do this?
Again social shaming. Totally ignores the variable that is 7-8billion people on the planet.
>Leaving out the fact that up until recently women literally were not allowed to work
Using past suffrage of others to validate her own points.
> Sorry if you weren't born attractive, neither was I so I get it. But we have to be able to put something of value on the table if we want people to be with us.
Again shaming but while victimizing itself to make a passive aggressive statement about the other while making itself look better in comparison.

>>4925711
t. breastlet

>women and faggots ruin everything
>NOOOO WAAH IS NOT TRUE
>thread is full of crabs, drama talk and dumb shit
i think we need to introduce an apex predator on this board

>>4838938
>he seeks female companionship
pathetic and ngmi

>>4675495
oh thanks. Can you tell me what I got wrong observational wise? Pic related is the ref

>>4625383
Just trace you retard

Looks like """heavily referenced""" (any parts of a picture that aren't copied from photos are absolute /beg/-tier) fetish shit that tries to pretend it's not just tasteless fetish shit.

>>4392023
>>4392034
Obsessing over some random dude like a teenage girl. NGMI

That's because in the case of China and Japan they are relatively free of SJW degeneracy. While in Korea it just hit them recently. After academia was infiltrated and coopted in the western world into playing this stupid game it has failed to produce even one artist of value. Funny enough most of the good asian artists learn and recommend western material (Loomis, Vilppu, Bridgman, James Gurney) which was produced by great western artists that managed to get proper formation before the west became pozzed.

ITT
>pornfags desperately trying yet again to plug in the narrative that exploiting zoomers and porn addicts in the current year is an art of itself and a sign of skill
no amounts of shilling or pseudo intellectual arguments will make you real artists
pornfags are the equivalent of drug dealers
know your fucking place, trash