[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Search:


View post   

>> No.4766979 [View]
File: 546 KB, 979x832, 1488867778122.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4766979

>got paid for a commission recently using paypal
>invoice only mentions my paypal business name
>checked my bank account once the money was deposited
>my transaction history only mentions my paypal business name, nothing else
So it's anonymous right, the other guy wouldn't be able to find my name? Or am I a dumbass?

>> No.3196443 [View]
File: 546 KB, 979x832, 1488867778122.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3196443

>>3194786
>>3195181
>>3196244
Hey, thanks for the feedback guys. Coming back to this thread -and looking at my drawing again after almost a week of not doing so- I can totally see what you're saying, and I can also see some more stuff I hadn't noticed myself. It's about looking at it with fresh eyes. There's always that potential problem for art, and I don't know if any of you guys know how to fix it besides good old "flip the canvas", but I wanted to talk a bit about this and see what you guys think/do about it. For example, I swear the the sword looked so correct all this time, but now I look at it with fresh eyes and I can see it so clearly that I kinda want to 3D-print it and stab myself with it. And now I see issues like that everywhere else, the ear, the foot, the hair, some of the proportions etcetera. Are any art books adressing that kind of thing? or are we expected to just spot the flaws as we keep on gitting gud and rely on time breaks and flipping the canvas? sorry for the mini-rant, I wanted /ic/'s opinion on the topic.

Also I can't believe someone remembers me for that Dicaprio portrait, that's pretty cool, I'm glad to see the same anons are still coming here somewhat regularly.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]