/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3454933
Holy crap, I remember critiquing this ages ago. Is this really your work years later? >>3454671
I'd honestly recommend studying some fundamentals... your work hasn't improved at all, only 3% less creepy looking. You've still got a lot of the beginner mistakes that most people get over a couple weeks in. Have you been reading Loomis? Hampton? Keys to Drawing? That's fine if you don't want to be a professional artist, I think only a small amount of /ic/ artists want to "go pro". But don't you want to be able to produce better work? You could easily be at pic related's level after 3 years of earnest study and practice. Get to it, anon. Name calling a bunch of strangers on the internet isn't going to help you.

>>3409937