/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3591255
I mean A: it isn't a selfie a photoshopped off the most of the camera hand.
B: It's a reference pose for future porpoises.
C: I'm not wrong tho.

Drawing stops being satisfying like anything if you grind it like it's your job. And when it comes to JUST DRAW memes, at a certain point it's just a masturbatory plateau of feeling comfortable enough doing what you got basically competent at. Sensory satiation may be a phrase idk.

Like I've said it a bunch by meow but "art" to (me) is about story telling. And basic drawing is like learning your letters. You can grind letters all day and become a great calligrapher or whatever but you're not getting anywhere closer to being able to write a good novel.

The way the brain works is that it encodes novel and challenging stimuli more than if you're repeating the same thing over and over. So if you switch mediums occasionally or start focusing on next applicable levels of production or do basically anything that is "same same but different" (to borrow a transexual hooker expression) you'll be learning and remembering what you're doing better than if you just grind boxes for 1000 hours.

If a dude fucks 1000 women and 5 trannies, they'll probably remember the trannies more just as an extension of availability heuristics and how memory works and stuff. So if you want to "feel better" you should quit stroking your ego doing the same thing you've established you can do and start letting a lady boy or 2 fuck you in the ass every once in a while.

>>3589617
>i'm telling you that this shit idea is what any entry level student at an art academy will "try".
But you never did it though huh? Are you not in academy yet then? When do you start "trying?"

And honestly, like why should I care if some anonymous virgin says an early painting looks like an "entry level" attempt at "trying" something? It absolutely was. Problem?

Every painting is me trying something different. Why do you struggle with that? Why do you have such an empty and negative view on experimentation and subversion and "trying" things? You know how I know you're NGMI?

> have an air of "i know it all!"
Projecting? I know what I did. I never really claim to "know it all." And the best way to learn things is to do things.

>and delusions of grandeur ("Ima have my own wikipedia page yall!")
That's not a very grandiose delusion m8. I could just make one if I wanted to probably. Does sarcasm not translate into your gooksprecht?
>and throw around bits of theory that they completely misunderstand
Explain the misunderstanding.
>use black color and even mix black color in skin tones
>>3586982
Feel like we're going around in circles. Why do you choose to be disingenuous?
>and then wonder why the fuck it looks like diarrhea and vomit
i'm not wondering that. You must be confused.
>use cheap materials
problem?
>say "gesso" and have no idea what that originally was and what it is made of today …
go on lol.
>all of this is a dead-giveaway of an absolute beginner.
better that (you) lmao
>you are like that annoying 7yr old
You almost certainly are an actual 15 year old. Try harder qt.

>>3585768
>still choosing to run from it then
run from what? I HAVE to respond to (you)s.
>that's okay, introspection is really hard
I mean for one thing my intrapersonal intelligence scores are off tha chartz. I'm constantly and obsessively introspective to the point where I'm seeking out bullies on /ic/ to tell me what's wrong with me. Introspection isn't really that hard. Being an uppity faggot is hard though, which is part of your problem.
> but I genuinely do hope that you get over your desperate defensiveness and learn how to improve yourself
What the fuck am I being "desperately defensive" about? I'm responding to stuff. And it's not like I'm necessarily even disagreeing. My entire point is about embracing and accepting the wabi sabi aesthetics of imperfection and impermanence and stuff. Things are allowed to be schlock.

I'd say I hope you learn to "improve yourself" when it comes to making metal bugs but how would I even know if you did? I aint know shit about making metal bugs.

>instead if receding into that comfortable shell of antagonism and ego.
The series is about (you). It's about 4chan and anonymity and toxicity and the concept of a hivemind of id-rewarding self-destructing idiots projecting themselves anonymously to fundamentally destroy their own culture. You're a bunch of ugly faggots. I'm a reflection of this. That's the project.

>You'll be better for it when it happens.
No I'm going to be dead.

>>3581412
>Becomes a millionaire while people spend all day grinding anatomy and boxes.
money launderers aren't interested in boxes

>>3542748
I don't know that I "hold" spite. I think it can be a powerful motivator though. And I'm talking to anonymous kids. Why the fuck would I think you're better than me? Why would I think you're better than anyone? How would I know? Why would it matter?

Do you think you're better than everyone? Do you think you're better than me? Why would you think I would know that? Why would you think I would care?

tbphwyf I doubt you're even very good. Much less would I ever think you're "better" than anyone, anon. I guess you could say I "hold spite" for people that remind me of what I was like 15 years ago. And /ic/ is basically just a sludgepit of all that adolescent self-importance and virginal bitterness that gets muh cringegears grinding. Your ire burns my fire bb.

>>3525139
>You ate shit for being shit
which is fine. you donothing nazi faggots don't produce anything of value to anyone at all and justify it by acting autistic about muh fundamentals.
>and your legacy because of that will be shit.
better than nothing friendo.
>I just hope you enjoy shit, because shit is all you'll get.
oh yeah I come here for the uppity self-important children throwing shit at me from their monkey cages. You're not worth anything other than spite kiddo :D

>>3506430
>That another trick you learned from perspective master Vincent Van Gogh?

Actually yeah. He ate shit constantly for using elementary level transfer techniques onto canvas. He ate shit from contemporaries and his artist friends because he used a perspective frame for almost everything. He literally had a blacksmith make him a giant fucking window frame with wires on it that he would schlep out into the woods for his paintings.

He (I believe) literally never painted anything from imagination. He would draw thick guidelines on the canvas (which he then had to apply thick layers of paint to cover up), and generally "cheated" as much as he could by artfag standards when it came to transferring to canvas.

What's your preferred method? I'll do one that way.