/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4542891
Choob is a good dad

>>4542009
Choobity choobity choob

>>4541999
no it's too late! choob has posessed him..

>>4541482
I cant stop saying choob's name, it just rolls off the tongue so well; help

>>4541479
CHOOB

fucking kek choob

>>4529403
Choob made his sub in around 4h. Git gud.

>go to >>/ic/thread/S2981233#p2985308
>ctrl-f "choob"
>notice nicnac's first post about ded in the same thread >>/ic/thread/S2981233#p2986068
>las on the verge of death >>/ic/thread/S2981233#p2982489
>saucy gives up the flawless race to fluffable >>/ic/thread/S2981233#p2985545
those were dark times man, between the choobposting and shit dog fuck man, but the night is darkest before the dawn

>>4529088
There's some stuff from that time in the archive >>/ic/?task=search&ghost=&search_text=choob+trace

>>4529068
Do you have what Choob drew to compare it with?

>>4529064
Choob allegedly traced https://twitter.com/i/web/status/765957234425602048 without crediting it, someone caught on and got really mad about him in the threads, they kept going on about it and that became the origin of the choobposter

>>4528801
>Jozu and Choob already talked about it on the discord
Really? And what was conclusion of that discussion?

choob is based and their comments are really insightful and well thought through

>>4528799
Why are you stirring up shit again. Jozu and Choob already talked about it on the discord

Choob is a smoothbrained retard for givingcreativechad jozu the same score as to creativitylet Kazoo.

Ability to solve composition problems creatively is a part of composition skill set. It's impossible to show this kind of creativity without already having some composition skills.

>>4527507
Don't be so salty, Choob.

>>4527415
Fair enough. Thanks for your time, Choob!

>>4527270
Hey Choob, nice to see you here!
I've read your crit and in this particular category it was rubbish.
>Kaz did well with designing everything around the focal point including the crows
That belongs in the composition category, not originality.

>I only gave a couple of 4s and 5s across all the entries. From my scoring people got more points for doing things in an unusual way, like bez showing multiple parts of the story in one enclosed space, or jozu, awetos etc doing stuff totally differently to how it's usually portrayed
...read again what you just wrote.

First you're saying
>I gave jozu a 3 for creativity
And now:
>I only gave a couple of 4s and 5s across all the entries (...) or JOZU (!), awetos etc doing stuff totally differently to how it's usually portrayed.

Could someone explain creativity & originality category to me?

Kazoo got 4 points for originality for a girl sitting on a fancy chair.
Choob in the originality category praised that it feels like a book cover and gave her 3 points - but what does it have to do with being creative? Shouldn't that be a part of composition score or materials and media score?
Stutter completely ignored how generic it is and just mentioned composition. NicNac gave her 5 points, basically saying that pic related "shows masterful evidence of creativity and originality in the unique style and expression of it's ideas".

Meanwhile jozu did IMO a very original take on a story with 3 pigs and wolf: https://dad.gallery/submissions/61594 . He got lower creativity score than Kazoo.
Auto, Nicnac and Choob think it was just as creative as pic by kazoo. Choob mentioned "I've never seen this story like this in my life. ", but it clearly didn't affect his score. Stutter praised original concept and gave him 3 points, 1 point less than what Kazoo got.

Clearly I don't understand what creativity is about, because to me Kazoo should get 2, maybe 2,5 points for creativity. Could someone explain to me what's going on?

I'm not even memeing and I don't have anything against Kazoo - she's nice and I like her. I just think judges aren't very fair in this category and I'd like to have an explanation - maybe I just misunderstood this whole thing.

>>4523755
I didn't know much about choob, but I'm surprised by his thoroughness and attention to detail and warm way of writing

Goblin
>Choob: 8
>AutoReiv: 13
>Stutter: 10
>NicNac: 9

What did they mean by this?

S tier - 2 users - bezdomny, Crud
A tier - 6 users - Peltingfury, KazooKD, j, Nessie, lamprey, awetos
B tier - 15 users - Jason, Notosh, echo, jozu, Cath, Nirest, Shameboxx, mrpurin, Choob, hoppy, meru, Apricot, SugarBeetle, pink, tabascoshrimp
C tier - 15 users - Sticky, Lafayette_Tiki, yyyhaw, Panzer, greencat, furart, guespiere, Clover, VuSta, st*rs, vani, Maw, Goblin, konsui, lonku
D tier - 6 users - rhomphy, EngeeEml, the1banana, Defunct, BeretB, toxicgad
E tier - 2 users - dezukaful, Axalalal
Y tier - 16 users that joined, but didn't submit anything - maze, Derp, Zeke, beepbird, Genzai, zamish, MysticLog, tmart11, kringlefkr, AutoReiv, Rakimora, nicnac, silvemis, oisín, ducker, Jet
Z tier - users that didn't join

Choob was deeply motivating and Stutter made me wanna kms

now my brain is in some weird motivational limbo

>>4523255
>the essays choob and stutter wrote