[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 1.09 MB, 603x698, 1500221581143.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
61405269 No.61405269 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

Why are people still so hype about ryzen when Intel destroys it so hard in real world performance?

>> No.61405287

That couch is horrible.

>> No.61405305
File: 67 KB, 800x552, AMD-Ryzen-7-1700-OpenSSL-Verify-Benchmark-800x552.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>when Intel destroys it so hard in real world performance?

>> No.61405315
File: 32 KB, 600x600, Intel Shills.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.61405323
File: 43 KB, 699x637, 1420834220908.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Can't trick me you devious poster

You need to go on a diet after all that bait you just ate

>> No.61405326 [DELETED] 

Niggers have shit taste in couches.

>> No.61405364
File: 61 KB, 1306x1646, 1080_All.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Keep baiting fagface

>> No.61405453 [DELETED] 
File: 22 KB, 300x300, 1440099492784.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>tfw your not a rich nigger that can be purposefully ignorant, gaudy, annoying, and generally terrible
>tfw you will never be able to just be completely offensive in every way and just be like MUH CULTURE

>> No.61405482
File: 1.63 MB, 360x270, 1492814759584.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

go back to /v/ you /v/irgin

>> No.61405648

Go back to /g/ you /g/amer

>> No.61405653 [DELETED] 

t. buttmad nigger

>> No.61405696

go back to the o/v/en you rabbi

>> No.61405717

Literally can't be fucked with this so >>61405648

>> No.61405726


Are those day1 benchmarks lol?

>> No.61405766

Yes they are.

>> No.61405871

Does anyone even enough care to redo them?
These are humans you're talking about...

>> No.61405985

Yeah sure no need in updating measurements as long as they fit the narrative.

>> No.61406071

Wow ryzen really is a piece of shit...
Glad I didn't upgrade from my I7 880 yet.

>> No.61406075

>real world performance
>posts gaymen benchmarks

>> No.61406096

Retard. http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-880-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-1600X/m15321vs3920

>> No.61406164
File: 52 KB, 1080x365, IMG_20170717_032425.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>33% faster single core performance when compared to an Intel CPU released 8 years ago
Thanks for proving my point.

>> No.61406202
File: 310 KB, 1618x519, this is what intelfags actually believe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.61406213

It's kind of their job, so, yes.
Day one benchmarks, dipshit. It's a shitty troll thread/post. The fact you took this seriously means you need to kill yourself ASAP.

>> No.61406217

It's funny because single core performance is still what's most important except for a few specific niche tasks.

>> No.61406233

Gaming isn't real benchmarks. You can use any toaster CPU with a Gsync/Freesync display and it'll be silky smooth with a good graphics card. Literally doesn't matter what CPU you use for gaming.

The funniest joke is that most people who think you need a good CPU for gaming use a shit tier mid range gfx card and struggle to reach 60 FPS.

>> No.61406235
File: 17 KB, 625x626, 1405579265706.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.61406267

because ryzen is the first thing to happen in CPUs since 10 years ago

literally not 1 interesting thing has happened since then

>> No.61406275

XTREEEEEEME single core speed is the niche now. Outside of old-ass games, 1080p 144 hz monitors and crappy alpha emulators, there's no need for it.

>> No.61406299

>day 1 benchmarks
even so, every ryzen chip in the top and the hundred+ intel chips that are more expensive aren't there cuz they're garbage

>> No.61406308

Depends on the game in question. I do agree that a large majority of people spend too much on the CPU and then skimp on the GPU considering their usage of the computer.

>> No.61406347

I'd rather have 1000 1 ghz cores than 100 10 ghz cores

the worst things that exist currently are browsers. servo will hopefully change that.

>> No.61406350

Intel atom.

They're good now.

>> No.61406364

>Intel atom.

>> No.61406375


In February 2017 Cisco Systems reported a clock signal issue[49] that would disable several of its products. Cisco stated, "we expect product failures to increase over the years, beginning after the unit has been in operation for approximately 18 months". Soon after this issue was linked to the Intel Atom SoC, and reports of other vendors[50] being affected started appearing online.

thx intel! the jew literally designed a chip that can't last 2 years

>> No.61406391

Fuck. I forgot about that.

How about core m then?

>> No.61406403
File: 1.47 MB, 1920x1200, unfair.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Not really. Even shit optimized old games run acceptably for me, and I have a 2GHz CPU. In modern games I can get 60-80 FPS.

If I had a Ryzen I'd crush these games.

>> No.61406463

Dont forget how everyone is suspiciously quiet on this as well, it's a ticking time bomb for a lot of very popular NAS products right now.

Also the fix is pretty much a resistor soldered to the motherboard which apperently only delays the inevitable to ~5years (so they say).

There has been a respin and it is fixed in new stepping and the next gen chips, neither are on the market yet.

>> No.61406480

I take it you don't play too many multiplayer games? Not that even a third generation i3 or newer won't usually be enough for them too.

>> No.61406525

Can you name the ambiguous multiplayer game which you're talking about? I can play ArmA3 and I don't think you could name a worse case scenario multiplayer game without dwelling into early access garbage that runs 20 FPS on a 5GHz i7 and dual Titan Xps.

>> No.61406565



>> No.61406628

Well, for example I had a less than stellar experience in CS:GO using a A6-3620 (4 cores at 2.2 GHz) from 2012. Vermintide seemed to also be pushing the limits of an i3-3220 on a few occasions. I could've been GPU bound too (used 270 and 280 respectively), but I'm pretty sure only the processors were pushed to full utilization.

Perhaps you have a different definition of a toaster CPU then?

>> No.61406652

ArmA3 actually seems to have pretty low minimum system requirements. Don't know if they are accurate though.

>> No.61406680

I can't play ARMA 3 on my laptop and I'm running an i7 2820qm.

It barely runs on my I7 3770 + fury x desktop...

>> No.61406751

That's a bad example. My 2GHz CPU is a Haswell-EP which is slightly worse than Ryzen in terms of IPC, so not utter garbage tier.

The A6-3620 has extremely low IPC and requires very high clock speeds to perform - it's an awful CPU. I do have a different definition of toaster CPU. When I say toaster I mean something that you'd pay around 250 dollars for in the past 5 years or so. So like a i5 2500K would be a toaster CPU. What I'm really trying to say that you don't need a 7700K at 4.5GHz to play games. It's simply not necessary.

ArmA3 barely runs on anything. That's why if you can run it at all, it's a good sign.

>> No.61406852

So the Witcher 3 screenshot was taken using the CPU you're talking about? I'd hardly call that 12-thread monster a toaster CPU. Nor would I call the trusty 2500K one either.

>> No.61406978

It's a 24 thread CPU. That's a 12 core with HT that defaults to 2GHz and turbos to 2.4GHz. From a gaming perspective it is a complete and utter toaster CPU.
Games rely a lot on single thread performance and it doesn't have any of that.

Also, it's down to perspective when it comes to calling CPUs like the 2500K toaster tier. I am an enthusiast and CPUs worse than 2500K isn't something you can find today in enthusiast space.

I mean there are a couple of Lynnfields and Nehelems here and there, but that's extremely rare and they still aren't netbook garbage tier.

>> No.61407320
File: 62 KB, 688x467, 1500193659308.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>"""Real world"""

>> No.61408623

And again nothing about the usage of the cpu.

I don't care loosing 10 fps using a ryzen at 50% against a i5 at 100%

>> No.61409115

If people are buying for games/single threaded programs, its best to have single thread high IPC+clock.

Mainly because game loop code is limited by the main core's speed. In that loop code, game devs also utilize the main core for many other tasks.

Then we get to the GPU stage, the main single core is one deciding the timings/syncronizing between gpu<>cpu, etc

TL;DR high ipc+clock is quite important.

>> No.61409242

That's because your Ryzen will never be well optimised. CPU 100% GPU 100% is ideal, if you don't like it cap your fps and CPU/GPU usage drops.

>> No.61409310
File: 87 KB, 806x681, 2600k-revisit-mll.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>CPU 100% is ideal
>i5's getting raped on minimums when this happens


>> No.61409503

I've never seen throttling like that with my CPU desu but I play at 1080p/60hz

>> No.61410087

that isn't throttling, those frame dips happen when the cpu can't keep up with the game (are at 100% usage)

>> No.61412223

That couch is horrible.

>> No.61412853

Where's the ryzen 1500? Isn't that priced against i5? Why exclude it?
Fucking AMD Shill.

>> No.61413331

Can't make this shit up
Zen is weaker in single threaded benchmarks than fucking Excavator.

>b-b-but it's 3.6GHz vs 3.4GHz
Even if you adjusted the Ryzen's score to the same clock frequency, it still loses to the Excavator CPU by a hundred points.

What a fucking joke of an architecture. This is literally Bulldozer rehashed and marketed.

>> No.61413366

tits or GTFO

>> No.61413396
File: 10 KB, 149x149, I_wonder_who_could_be_behind_this_post_nose_1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.61413459

>pre-release benchmark
Wow it's literally fucking nothing.

>> No.61413511

>low quality TIM bait
>intel $1k 10core 20 thread
>mad $1k 16core 32 thread
>intels faster!

>> No.61413718
File: 16 KB, 394x392, cpuzbench.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Clock for clock Ryzen is just behind Devil's Canyon in single thread performance.

>> No.61413743
File: 68 KB, 500x500, 1411177440158.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


good goyim, good

>> No.61414121

You're not funny.

>> No.61414193

>He doesnt play any RTS or mountain blade

>> No.61414227

Fucking idiot arma engine sucks dick anyways, educate your self

>> No.61414253

Lrn2gramma bitch.

>> No.61416406

If there aren't enough cores, single threaded performance will still suffer. You don't want the core running the main thread to be bogged down doing things for all the other threads.

>> No.61416453
File: 282 KB, 752x548, 1492139297054.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

There's no need to be upset.

>> No.61416886

It always amazes me how many CPU experts there are on /g/. Where do you guys learn everything about CPU architecture? How do you get so acquainted with the Summit Ridge architecture so quickly?

>> No.61416933

I'm considering the Ryzen meme. Tell me why I shouldn't.

I have a 2500k for reference.

>> No.61417401

>R5 1600 200$
>i5-7600k 215$

Fucking Intel shill

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.