>>77153893
>Is Ubuntu really that bad?
Yes. I installed it on my gf laptop that wanted to switch to linux, and it was horrible. Now that they are using gnome, and I'm pretty sure gnome by default isn't gimped like that, lock the users and limit as much as possible the customization. Nautilus, the file manager is trash, and every version have less features that normal people uses because guess what ? They have shiton of files to work with when doing office jobs. You got an android phone ? Let's give you some error that googling can't help! I installed thunar and magic, it works, so it was definitively a problem with nautiilus it self.
OH and for a "friendly user distro", you use it and for some unkown reason
>ubuntu has encountered a problem. Would you like to report ?
>report.
>every 5 minutes, repeat.
Ofc, those are back end bugs that the user do not notice, so you just google how to disable this shitty popup, which require command line.
As for the software library (gui), it is far behind the manjaro one, but it was always shit so whatever.
And this kind of shit happens with every single installation I make, laptop, desktop, nvidia, amd, whatever.
Then, there are so many problems with canonical itself, like taking the worst decision and not contribution to anything of the open source.
>Wayland is being developed ? Let's not contribute to it and make our own shit that no one will ever use
>Packages manager ? Let's make it use our shitty snap packages stuff that will slow and add more blow to our system