Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 96 KB, 845x978, it just works.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68330650 No.68330650 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

>apple's USB-C to 3.5mm adapter is $3 cheaper than Google's (which was originally $20)
lmao

>> No.68330675

>>68330650
>iToddlers have to buy ANOTHER dongle
lmao

>> No.68330692
File: 1.78 MB, 540x304, 1524465979200.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68330692

>>68330675
iTODDLERS DONGLED AGAIN

>> No.68330700 [DELETED] 
File: 407 KB, 2048x2048, F40C98C1-74C9-46E2-B5B9-FA15FACBACCD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68330700

S-so what?
Apple is gay ipajeet iPoojeet iFag iToddler icuck mactoddler macfag iNPC iNigger iPadjeet iPoo Appcuck Applel Appjeet
REEEE

>> No.68330711

>>68330650
The question is, are the components inside it better, the same or worse?

>> No.68330716
File: 21 KB, 470x495, 1264235796020.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68330716

>>68330650
>>68330700

>Having to carry Dongles

>> No.68330730

>>68330711
if it is, it's marginal at best. lower latency maybe, but device support is the big question.

>> No.68330753
File: 133 KB, 1200x689, 4A805CAA-B95A-4565-8C88-5D158FA052CB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68330753

>> No.68330774

>>68330730
That too, also material design. Apple doesn't have the best reputation for their cables but I don't know about Google.

>> No.68330788

>>68330753
the fuck chain of cables is that? It's Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2, then what? What are they even trying to connect?

>> No.68330808

>>68330753
>>68330788
nevermind, found it
>Thunderbolt 3 -> Thunderbolt 2 -> FireWire 800 -> FireWire 400
why?

>> No.68330954

And intelligent people don't buy hardware 'produced' (AKA assembled from off the shelves parts by Asians) by either company.

>> No.68330981

>>68330808
Old miniDV (or DV in general) camcorders and other DV equipment along shitloads of audio equipment from the late '90s up to the mid '00s

>> No.68331144

>>68330700
SEETHING

>> No.68331168

>>68330650
Buying a phone without 3.5mn jack and then using that adapter is cuck af

>> No.68331465
File: 77 KB, 690x720, 1540107815043.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68331465

>>68330700
>iPoojeet banned AGAIN

>> No.68331539

>>68330650
and probably has a third of the lifespan

>> No.68331576
File: 21 KB, 600x400, 1531580805677.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68331576

>>68330675
fpbp
>>68330692
based

OP FUCKING DESTROYED

>> No.68332022

>>68331465
based

>> No.68332472

>>68330700
>>68330692
based

>> No.68332507

>>68330650
>USB-C to 3.5mm adapter
there is no such animal

>> No.68333817

>>68330692
based

>> No.68334565

the point is to be wireless. Cablefags are living in the past.

>> No.68335110
File: 78 KB, 640x640, 1484785025553.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
68335110

>>68330650
>>68330753

DONGLED

>>68330692
>>68330675
>>68331576
>>68332022
>>68332472
>>68333817

based

>> No.68335115

Who the fuck still uses cabled earphones christ.

>> No.68335160

>>68335115
I like having the option. I use BT but you never know when you'll run out of batteries in the middle of a subway commute or something. The few times it has happened to me, it has been nice to be able to get my backup in-ear headphones and just plug them in.

>> No.68335315

>ITT old cunts living in the past and can't embrace USB C
>still using wired headphones
>plugging anything into a portable computer these days besides power

>> No.68335358

>>68330650
Multiple people have reported that Apple's works better, too – it works with everything it's plugged into and performs indistinguishably from a built in headphone port. Google's only works with some devices and occasionally blinks out on others.

To me it sounds like Google manufactures theirs on a vastly smaller scale, meaning to keep the price reasonable they have to cut corners.

>> No.68335490

>>68335358
that's because googles does not have a DAC in there, it's literally just a cable

That's why they copped so much flak for charging more than apple with nothing inside

>> No.68335522

>>68330753
The state of apple...

>> No.68335641

>>68335490
>that's because googles does not have a DAC in there, it's literally just a cable
I'm trying to find a source on that but the only source I have found, https://www.pcworld.com/article/3284186/mobile/bring-back-the-headphone-jack-why-usb-c-audio-still-doesnt-work.html , says it does have a DAC.

>> No.68335719

>>68335641
totally possible that it has a DAC, but it's turbo budget or otherwise basterdized (think winmodem sort of shit, where's it's half-software)

>> No.68335782

>>68335719
But you have no source, right?

>> No.68335882

>>68330692
Based Satania poster

>> No.68335902

>>68335115
Anyone who doesn't like hearing static noises

>> No.68335982

>>68334565
>>68335115
KYS subhuman trash

>> No.68336218

>>68330753
So, this is what the future looks like?

>> No.68336249

Alphabet makes cables now?
Just buy some cheap generic one.

>> No.68336277

>>68335641
There is a standard for analog Audio over USB-C.
There is absolutely no need to put a DAC in the adapter except maybe to save some money by removing the DAC from the phone (which is what Apple does).

>> No.68336478

>>68336277

>there is no DAC in iPhones

How do they produce sound then?

>> No.68336673

>>68336277
>There is a standard for analog Audio over USB-C.
It's not officially part of the standard, though. It's not required to confirm to the standard, and that's the problem.

>> No.68336681

>>68336277
Oh, and
>except maybe to save some money by removing the DAC from the phone (which is what Apple does).
Apple doesn't remove the DAC from the phone. They still need it for the speaker(s), at least.

>> No.68336693

>>68330692
based slut poster

>> No.68336812

>>68336277
>(which is what Apple does).

Wow apple is so far ahead of the competition they have digital speakers in their phones

>> No.68338363

>>68335782
> But you have no source, right?
I have BBQ, Tomato, mustard

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action