Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/g/ - Technology


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 35 KB, 653x726, 1522990739073.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66412444 No.66412444 [Reply] [Original] [archived.moe] [rbt]

AMD is the reason Firefox is slow LMAO and not releasing WebRender


DEFEND THIS YOU FUCKING SHILLS

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1432515#c11

> Basically, this feels like a gift to Nvidia's marketing department.^^ It
> would be a little more neutral if there were a possibility to whitelist a
> very few recent cards from other vendors to avoid headlines/teasers like
> "Firefox' new graphics engine is first exclusively available for Nvidia
> users".
>
> Perceived reason of the current procedure:
> Ancient Nvidia cards that were not blacklisted during Nightly and Beta would
> lead to late bug reports from Stable users. You would then put them in real
> time on the blacklist. So only one vendor will be left generously activated
> at first in order to minimize further risks such as losing users.

POO in GPOO AMDfags

My fucking browser is slow and will remain slow for at least another 3 month (2 Firefox version) because pajeets can't write drivers or work with software developers.

Please if you have any AMD component in your system conciser killing yourself you cheap dumb clueless fucks.

>> No.66412495
File: 265 KB, 868x756, shintel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66412495

>> No.66412497
File: 18 KB, 320x180, yccc3f4vcwsxyj6eydy2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66412497

>if you have a video card from a different vendor you should kys

>> No.66412509

>>66412444
Just wait for AMD to become more relevant and they will start optimizing every single app

>> No.66412533

This sounds more like Mozilla trying to shift blame

>> No.66412561

>>66412509
>AMD graphics becoming relevant anytime soon
Oh sweetie...

>> No.66412584

>>66412509
lel

>> No.66412602

>>66412444
The only reason for going nvidia only at first I can see from the linked thread, and it is not even explicitly stated, is because more people use nvidia and older nvidia cards may generate more problems
So, yeah, obviously amd fault that older nvidia cards are buggy

>> No.66412603

>>66412533
Read the reply from Mozilla - it's working perfectly on GTX1000 series and Win 10. But they don't want to hurt pajeet AMD feelings by enabling it for nVidia

>> No.66412629

>>66412602
You're right, it's not AMD fault that they are so irrelevant no on is using them and if they do it causes month-long pauses in software development. Fucking nVidia!

>> No.66412681
File: 41 KB, 802x799, 1523328652808.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66412681

>tfw fell for the "AMD is better on GNU/Linux" meme

>> No.66412728

>>66412561
>>66412584
It's good to hope though

>> No.66412755

>>66412681
I never participated in vendor/GPU wars before but AMD because so shit "recently" it's shitting all over software I use. WTF. How can someone be a fan of that? This is incomprehensible to a sane person.

>> No.66412976
File: 45 KB, 409x409, 1517761930323.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66412976

WebRender works fine on my HD4870. Guess it pays off not to be a consumerist.

>> No.66413155
File: 162 KB, 1000x1000, 1413913323099.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66413155

>>66412681
>>66412444

>> No.66413158

>>66412976
Isn't that old enough to be an ATI card? Would explain why it doesn't suffer from AMD fuckup

>> No.66413195
File: 256 KB, 1920x1080, webrender disabled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66413195

>>66412976
>$300 for top-tier GPU with great efficiency
I miss those times.

Anyways, 1/2

>> No.66413215
File: 292 KB, 1920x1080, webrender enabled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66413215

>>66413195
2/2

>>66412681
Aren't the Linux drivers by a completely different team? I think Linux has shit video playback on the browser too.

>> No.66413301

>>66413195
>>66413215
Not a huge difference in performance but offloading work to GPU will still be nice. How does it compare to Chrome/Chromium?

>> No.66413360
File: 187 KB, 1650x908, motionmark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66413360

>>66413195
>>66413215
Guess my 8400GS isn't up to the task

>> No.66413458
File: 293 KB, 1920x1080, webrender all.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66413458

>>66413215
Here's with webrender.all instead of webrender.enabled, basically the same except the design score looks fucked. Also, it looks like webrender changes the text rendering a bit.
>>66413301
I just updated Chromium, I'll try it in a sec.
>>66413360
Wow, 6700k and a 680 here.

>> No.66413527

>>66412495
You can have all the upboats

>> No.66413573
File: 210 KB, 1920x1080, chromium motionmark.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66413573

>>66413301
>>66413458
Here's Chromium.

>> No.66413612

>>66412444
Everyone knows that AMD is garbage at GPUs. Love the CPUs though.

>> No.66414127
File: 238 KB, 1007x690, screenshot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66414127

>>66412444
OH MY GOD AMD BTFO!!!!
AMD SHILLS ON SUICIDE WATCH!!!!
HOW WILL (((((((((((((((AMD)))))))))))))) EVER RECOVER???
THIS IS WORSE THAN RYZENFALL!!!!!

>> No.66414161

>be underage gayming subhuman
>AMD releases 6xxx, 7xxx, r9 2xx series
>clearly superior to what nvidia offers at that time
>still buy nvidia
>complain about AMD not being competitive after they have blown all their Budget for nothing
>complain about AMD not pushing nvidia prices down so a nvidia card can be purchased cheaper
>not kys him self
I would seriously stomp your head in if i would notice you being a complaining double standard nvidia gayming faggot

>> No.66414238

>>66414161
(((you))) sound angry :^)

>> No.66414277

>>66412444
trips of truth

>> No.66414301

>>66412444
isn't it the other way around? baning old nvidia cards means that new cards don't work and amd cards are "left generously activated at first in order to minimize further risks such as losing users"?

>> No.66414386

>>66412444
You just gave another reason to buy AMD GPU.

Keep crying nvidia-fag, you are the reason we have such huge prices now, cause you , dumbfag kept buying their shit.

>> No.66414408

>>66412603
>GTX1000 series
Works if you pay shitload of money on your setup.

>> No.66414416
File: 330 KB, 1920x970, benchmark.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66414416

no idea what this shit means but here's chromium on gtx 970 nvidia

>> No.66414452

>>66413458
Hmm since webrender.all gets lower score, maybe it also toggles the webrender.debug values to true? That could generate more useful data for developers at the cost of performance

>>66414416
How does it compare to Firefox with and without WebRender? Just posting benchmarks for one browser doesn't really say anything.

>> No.66414571

>>66414452

ill show firefox in a second, im a brainlet and dont know about webrenderer shit tho

>> No.66414751

>>66412444
Just use chrome?

>> No.66414795

>>66414238
neonazis should be curb-stomped for existing

>> No.66414905

>>66412509
AMD and Wait

why does these 2 words always come together

>> No.66414921
File: 282 KB, 1920x970, 2018-06-19-071609_1920x970_scrot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66414921

>>66414416
>>66414452

>> No.66415049
File: 398 KB, 2560x1440, motion_mark_ryzen1700x_win10prox64_r9290x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
66415049

>>66414921
This is what I get on my machine with Firefox 60.2

>> No.66415578

>>66414905
because at best amd doesn't rush broken drivers
in the what, since the 5770 ro 280x I never had an issue with amd drivers outside of battlefield bitching at be to install new betas which I refused to do.

>> No.66415625

>>66413195
>>66413215
I assume this 'mark tests a browser's GPU usage capability?

>> No.66415631

>>66412444
>incompetent sjw firefuck devs
>blame it on amd
yea

>> No.66415824

>>66412444
>mozilla develops a program
>suddenly the program doesnt work on a gpu
>developers dont know why
>decide to blame the third party company despite the company being totally unaware of
>thinks this is somehow amd fault that the devs dont do their job

>> No.66416292

>>66412681
Enjoy your crashes and lack of proper Wayland support.

>> No.66416403

Amd fangays damage controll squad already arrived

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action