[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 2.37 MB, 1779x927, styles.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13311627 No.13311627 [Reply] [Original]

hmmmm

>> No.13311636
File: 176 KB, 800x3927, rsns.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13311636

#surrey #surreal #slurry #survey

>> No.13311639
File: 15 KB, 854x435, year-of-birth.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13311639

wew

>> No.13311649
File: 18 KB, 555x434, biological-sex.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13311649

#demographics #2017 #circles

>> No.13311657
File: 27 KB, 555x426, Melanin Augmentation Level.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13311657

>> No.13311661
File: 33 KB, 566x390, occupation.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13311661

oh, btw, number of respondents was about 565 individuals
biggest so far

>> No.13311667
File: 57 KB, 556x382, Wizard percentage.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13311667

>> No.13311669
File: 15 KB, 737x456, self-rated-attractiveness.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13311669

b e a u tiful

>> No.13311684
File: 128 KB, 1001x499, country-name-size-by-nationality.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13311684

w o r l d c l o u d
(get it?)

~ 40% of all users are from the US
4% of all users from the UK
an additional ~3% of all users are from England specifically
~8% of all users are Canadians
~7% of all users are Aussies

>> No.13311686
File: 146 KB, 1001x499, effay-major-designers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13311686

most popular designers/houses
(biggest = most mentioned)

>> No.13311687
File: 164 KB, 1001x499, effay-minor-designers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13311687

collection of designers that were mentioned a bit less than the others in the previous image
(biggest = most mentioned in this group)

>> No.13311689
File: 169 KB, 1001x499, movies-series.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13311689

"most fashionable/stylish films"

>> No.13311701
File: 1.31 MB, 2880x1800, 1418184747795.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13311701

>>13311689
oh, and here's an IMDB list of the 186 films mentioned:
https://www.imdb.com/list/ls068627513/
the list will probably be up as long as the internet is around.
feel free to compile a better list out of the films that are actually good

cheers

>> No.13311722

warosu archive link:
>>/fa/thread/13311627
(you can save the above link and refer to this thread later)

#survey #demographics

>> No.13311998

>>13311639
>19 mean age
no wonder this board is shit

>> No.13312012

based data, ty op

>> No.13313030

bump 4 interest

>> No.13313188

>>13311649
>not also asking gender
weak

>> No.13313207

>>13311627
Wow you have to admit this is more thorough than anything I ever did

>> No.13313270

>>13311627
Based STHLM

>> No.13313277

>>13313188
same thing fag

>> No.13313282
File: 32 KB, 486x750, shelly TP.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13313282

>>13311701
hannibal, twin peaks, and trainspotting top 3 hell yeah

>> No.13313284

>>13313188
no one cares sjw, i agree they're different things but complaining about it on 4chan is fucking retarded

>> No.13313286

>>13311701
pretty good list but some absolute pleb-tier choices are too high, like fucking game of thrones even being top 100 is ridiculously shite, let alone top 50

>> No.13313458

>>13313277
>>13313284
What the hell us wrong with wanting to know how many tranners there are? The People are curious.

>> No.13314168

>>13311687
>label under construction
>lost and found

how old is this

>> No.13314256

>>13311649
Explains why fa is 10% worse

>> No.13314484

>>13314168
from May last year I think

>> No.13315186

>>13311998
lol ur probably one of the 30 year olds

>> No.13315195

>>13313207
you mean buy breakfast for some guy on /soc/ then fuck him?

>> No.13315221

>>13311687
I've rarely seen Van Beirendonck mentioned here. Actually many of these I've never seen mentioned. Glad to see the great fashion designer Frank Lloyd Wright got a mention though.

>> No.13315238

>>13311686
>gosha rubchinskiy bigger than nike and supreme

ya this is made up

>> No.13315359

>>13315238
it's not a compilation of how many times the designer/house is mentioned on /fa/. people were just asked to submit their fave designers in a survey

>> No.13315413

>>13311627
>I just take elements from every style
Is this a valid strategy?

>> No.13315645

>>13311639
>Tfw born in 1988.

Ok.

>> No.13315887

>>13314256
YOU'RE LITERALLY A FAT UGLY SPIC IN HIS 30S STOP POSTING NO ONE WANTS YOUR OPINION

>> No.13316993

>>13313207
well, to be fair... you have a life

>>13312012
>>13313270
my pleasure

>>13313286
yes, I noticed this as I compiled it. only the first 40 or so were mentioned multiple times (the top ones mentioned the most). some people seem to have interpreted the question as "your favorite film/series". please take this piece of fashionable-film-ore and extract its pure minerals.

>>13313188
>>13313458
inquiring about mental illness would be a bit too intrusive

on a sexuality-related note I can give you this:

SEXUALITY (ATTRACTION)
>"HETEROSEXUAL": 65.7%
>"BISEXUAL": 16.0%
>"HETEROSEXUAL, BUT I LIKE TRAPS": 13.3%
>"HOMOSEXUAL":2.5%
>"OTHER": 2.5%

>> No.13317010
File: 339 KB, 619x567, 5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13317010

>>13316993
also
>mfw seeing 13.3%

>> No.13317018

>>13316993
>HETEROSEXUAL, BUT I LIKE TRAPS
Stop deluding yourselves

>> No.13317345

>>13316993
KEK

>> No.13317371
File: 58 KB, 625x415, 22ab6395549c583a40bae48216d6559938048d7fe0ac8f44d3f43e93ae425c6d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13317371

>>13311667

>> No.13317391

Where is this from? Where did you get the birth years?

>> No.13317395

>>13314484
>>13317391
If this is from May of last year why don't we organize a new one? Unless this is the results for the board right now.

OP when is this from?

>> No.13317398

>>13316993
>all these faggots and "bisexuals" in the closet
Amazing

>> No.13317459

>born in 2003

Jesus Christ If I got the girl I lost my virginity to pregnant I could be /fa/'s dad

>> No.13317480

>>13317018
>>13317010
this, you're bi if you like traps anons, face it.
>>13317398
bisexual is a perfectly valid orientation, people can appreciate the beauty in boys and girls, but to different levels. defo exists on a spectrum. like I have / will only make out with guys/oral, never anal sex. but am generally much more attracted to girls and have only had real relationships with girls
not surprising there's a sizeable bi community in /fa, models I know tend to be bi and at art school lots of the cool people that'd be considered "fa" are bi

>> No.13317588

>>13314484
Was expecting much further back, like back to peak goffninja considering the brands in the image. It feels like years since I've seen anyone mention stuff like The Viridi Ann and MA on /fa/

>> No.13317609

>>13317459
>lost my virginity to
good one bro

>> No.13318282

>>13317588
sure. I think people were just namedropping all the brands they knew.

>> No.13318301

>>13317480
If you like traps, if you're bi, you'll have sex with a "post-op transexual" or if you prefer men doesn't matter you meet the definition of homosexual.

>> No.13318304

>>13318301
There are only 2 genders and there are only 2 sexual orientations

>> No.13318647

>>13311639
absolutely disgusting

>> No.13318649

>>13311684
wwew

>> No.13318656

>>13314256
fuck off fat cuck

>> No.13319452

>>13315413
always.

>> No.13319481

>>13316993
>/fa/ is filled of straight boys in their teens
Whew

>> No.13319489

>>13311687
I have a hard time believing this. I’ve lurked /fa/ for probably 6 years and I’ve seen LUC discussed less than 10 times, and I’ve almost NEVER seen anyone actually wear it.

>> No.13319673

>>13311636
>reasons to visit /fa/
to dunk on weebs in virtual divegrass
>>13319652

>> No.13320730

>>13319673
don't advertise threads, faggot