WATCHES: POST EM HERE YOU DUMB FUCKS

[Anonymous No.9779715]

Microbrand edition

[Anonymous No.9779718]

bloody fuckin chunga, mate

[Pony Cum Jar Project Guy No.9779787]

>>9779715
Wearing this one until my Omega gets back from service.

[Anonymous No.9779808]

One of the reason I love brands like Doxa,Eterna "specially the Super kontiki", Rolex,omega,panerai. Is becouse of their history..

Micro brands like halios,benarus,deep blue and all that shit is becouse they just order their watches from a chink catalog and stamp their name on it.

[Anonymous No.9779836]

Been meaning to buy this.

Ansley Watch Co. Small Irish company. Quite nice designs.

[Anonymous No.9780011]

>>9779808
Aside from Rolex, all of those other brands "with history" have whored it out, Doxa and Eterna worse than the others because they sold out to the Chinese.

[Anonymous No.9780017]

>>9780011
Rolex havent whored themselves out?... lmao

[Anonymous No.9780022]

>>9780017
Still independently owned.

[Anonymous No.9780032]

watchbeards need not apply

[Anonymous No.9780059]

>>9779787

I was about to say this particular watch always reminds me of the pony cum jar.

Then I saw your trip.

God speed anon. What Omega do you have?

[Anonymous No.9780065]

>>9780032

[I'm da Lawyer yo No.9780105]

>>9780032
iShit

>>9780065
My feelings as well bro

[Anonymous No.9780112]

watches arent effay

[I'm da Lawyer yo No.9780113]

>>9779787
Didn't knew you had that watch also m8. Enjoy it.

[I'm da Lawyer yo No.9780115]

>>9780112
Hey look, an autistic nignog

[Anonymous No.9780122]

>>9780065
>>9780105

Like it matters what you autists think. Watch people have LITERALLY the worst taste in aesthetics.

>herp derp face is never huge enough. needs more dials. needs a more gaudy band.

[Anonymous No.9780125]

>>9779715

I really like the look of the Delfin and might try to get in on the next batch.

[Anonymous No.9780130]

>>9780115
>a nigger
>because i dont buy tons of watches and other shit
"The black is indolent and a dreamer; spending his meager wage on frivolity or drink; the European has a tradition of work and saving, which has pursued him as far as this corner of America and drives him to advance himself, even independently of his own individual aspirations"
-Che Guevara

who is the nigger now?

[Anonymous No.9780134]

>>9780122
exactly, watches are merely a distraction fom your shit and cheap fits anyway.

[Anonymous No.9780235]

Is the Seiko SARB any decent?

[JosefStalin No.9780245]

>>9780235
Yeah man, great for its price. You can really find an objectively better watch for the money, sapphire crystal, good movement, great bracelet. I'm assuming you are talking about the sarbs that are for sale besides the cocktail time, they can be a bit small if you aren't a nip though

[Pony Cum Jar Project Guy No.9780549]

>>9780059
>another not so fancy watch of mine

It's a vintage Omega Seamaster from 1962. Got it from my friend who got it from a watchmaker in Switzerland. >>9780113
Thanks m8. I mostly bought it because Benedict Cumberbatch wore it during Sherlock. I like the simple but elegant look. Would have been better if it was mechanical though.

[Anonymous No.9780554]

arrived today

[Anonymous No.9780728]

r8 combo

[Anonymous No.9780750]

>>9780554
Smelly euro trash detected

[Anonymous No.9780755]

>>9780554
which model?

[Anonymous No.9780811]

>>9780750
I am not used to wear a watch, that's why I wanted to start with a cheap one with the risk i'll never wear it

>>9780755
A500WEA-7EF

[Anonymous No.9781019]

>>9780728
>bracelet with straight endlinks
>those huge gaps between links
>ugly textured center link
Jesus anon what the fuck are you doing

[Anonymous No.9781043]

>>9781019

I concur. Nigger fucked up.

[Anonymous No.9781067]

I've had this watch since I was 16. It's very durable and the glass still isn't scratched. It's lasted me a long time but I'm thinking of getting something less childish now.

Pic related is the watch I've had, bought it for £50.

Will post option 1 and 2 in a sec

[Anonymous No.9781075]

>>9781067
Option 1

£60

[Anonymous No.9781079]

>>9781067
Option 2

£150

Not sure if it's worth the price. Money isn't an issue but I would prefer to save where possible.

[Anonymous No.9781088]

>>9781075
>>9781079


Neither tbh. Too much going on. That second one would be cool if the bezel wasn't so thick, and if it came in SS, and if it didn't have a partially skeletonized dial.

Get yourself a nice and simple Seiko or something.

[Anonymous No.9781092]

>>9781067
>>9781075
>>9781079
All of these are so so needlessly complicated, their like something a kindly southern grandpa would wear. Simplicity will never work against you, complication will.

[Anonymous No.9781096]

Microbrands? I was very impressed with this watch, what should my next microbrand be? I think the Helgray Silverstone looks pretty nice in green and it would be my first mechaquartz watch.

[Anonymous No.9781099]

>>9781092
>>9781088
Understood, I'll look for something more simplistic, thanks lads.

[Anonymous No.9781103]

Seiko 5 masterrace

[Anonymous No.9781105]

>>9781103
I am thinking of buying that one.
Still doubting about the day & date.
The leather band looks way better.

[Anonymous No.9781113]

>>9781099

Something like this for instance>>9781103

Cheap, reliable, and automatic for extra *tips wrist* cool factor.

[Anonymous No.9781123]

>>9781113
Manually winding your watch every morning is way more fedora though

[None !ioSrx3T7K. No.9781124]

>>9781105
Be careful when doing so, lot of rubbish out there. Got a vintage one from the UK, grabbed the leather band from a watch part shop near me.

It's reliable as fuck, just don't get it from india/china.

>>9781103
was me, posting from phone :^)

[Anonymous No.9781125]

>>9781103
Looks pretty nice, is that a 70s model? There's so many cool Seikos from that era.

[None !ioSrx3T7K. No.9781132]

>>9781125
70's model fully functioning etc. 35 bucks from an auction on ebay

[Anonymous No.9781141]

>>9781125
Moon language date looks pretty cool

[/g/ No.9781142]

>>9780130
>watches are for niggers
>watches
>the making of which is a craft that has been refined through generations of white men
>virtually exclusive to white countries until international commerce became a thing and the japs got into the business and nipnonged quartz technology
>blacks can't even afford good ones, and when they can they buy the worst ones possible for their money
kek

[Anonymous No.9781144]

>>9781123

I love manual wind and automatic movements. It's just people outside of the watch world think it's autistic to have to keep it wound.

I personally think it's cool factor, but busting a nut over a movement, in the opinion of a layman, would be pretty fedora.

Doesn't stop me.

[Anonymous No.9781158]

>>9781144
Oh I absolutely love it too, but it's autistic for most people. No ugly rotor to hide the caliber + thinner case. Also manually winding a watch feels great.

[/g/ No.9781161]

>>9781158
Rotors don't have to be ugly.

[Anonymous No.9781167]

>>9781161

They do for almost everything that's not in-house.
As in, some aftermarket rotors fitted to 9015s and ETAs

> based GO and their delicious balance cock

[Anonymous No.9781171]

>>9781142
That gave me a semi.
Do you have any more?

[Anonymous No.9781177]

>>9781171
Just watch the whole thing. It's on youtube

[Anonymous No.9781185]

>>9781171

Heads up: the end product is total niggerspec. I was so disappointed with Patek when they released pics of that monstrosity.

Relate

[Anonymous No.9781192]

>>9781185
You're not supposed to wear it

[/g/ No.9781194]

>>9781167
>tfw no mass production microrotor movement
buren pls come back

>>9781171
i have 10 other webms from that set, 62 webms in total, about 15-20 of which are start-to-finish sets of watchmaking

[Anonymous No.9781202]

>>9781177
That's the best.

>>9781185
And that is the absolute worst.
I really don't get why watchmakers create such horrible, horrible things.. And that's a god damn Patek.. Unbelievable

[Anonymous No.9781203]

>>9781192

Naturally, but come on. It's so fucking gaudy. It's like walking into a rich wog's house.

It reminds me of a dark person anon.

[Anonymous No.9781209]

>>9781194

Whoa. What calibre?

> tfw so many brilliant watch companies destroyed by quartz

[Anonymous No.9781211]

>>9781161
Sure it's allright, but it can't beat a chronograph imo

[Anonymous No.9781232]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6WMenS141A
GOAT
Lawyer guy, when are you getting a Grande Sonnerie?

[/g/ No.9781233]

>>9781202
It's intricate as fuck regardless of how you actually feel about the aesthetics of it. Like the other anon said, it's more meant to sit in a display case inside some russian oil baron's vault than actually be worn on someone's wrist.

>>9781209
They sold it to a lot of different companies so what it's actually designated as varies from watch to watch. Bulova, Dugena, Hamilton, and obviously Buren itself all used the movement. The one pictured is Hamilton's, the most common version of which is the cal. 620
>tfw it was a grail for so long and then my grandpa left me one in his will without even knowing
thanks grandpa

[Anonymous No.9781234]

Here's my microbrand watch
> puny wrist master race

[Anonymous No.9781247]

>>9781234
Oh hey another dude pretending to own a rolex in the watch thread, how original

[Anonymous No.9781250]

I need to chose.
I posted this earlier but I can't chose at all.
Either a regular Seiko or a replica Rolex.
I dress quite preppy and nobody would think the Rolex is fake at all, but I dislike the fact that it's a replica and it might break easily.
Of course I would add a light brown leather band with both of them.
I dislike the Seiko brand but it's the only thing I can wear since I have a bet going about me not being able to go a month wearing a $100 watch.
Sorry if I sound like a douchebag also sorry if my English is bad.

[Anonymous No.9781255]

>>9781250
Seiko. And there's absolutely no reason to dislike Seiko. In fact, there are many reasons to love them.

[Anonymous No.9781261]

>>9781233

Yes but it's like having a Ferrari with all of its mechanical prowess hidden beneath a bodykit from a glitzy rice burner.

Patek is so well established as "the best" that they can do whatever the fuck they want and everyone in the watch world will eat it up like it's the next greatest thing. They're like Apple these days. Okay, that was taking it a tough too far...

It just doesn't look good. I know you'd never see the movement given its design, but still, it could have been much nicer to look at. Zenith did much better with their "milestone" piece imo.

[Anonymous No.9781263]

>>9781250
Definitely the Seiko.

[Anonymous No.9781278]

>>9781233
That's a nice looking movement. That particular thinomatic is really nice too, I started checking out vintage thinomatics on ebay but there aren't many stainless ones and none of them look as good as that one.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781282]

>>9781250
if you can't afford a real rolex

a replica rolex is still better than some random japanese homage

[Anonymous No.9781287]

>>9781255
>>9781263
I don't really see the love for Seiko, but I guess I just don't know enough about them

>>9781282
I really like the Rolex too, I'm a bit biased.
However your reputation precedes you

[/g/ No.9781290]

>>9781261
The point of the chime was to set records, though. They actually said that the reason they hadn't done anything like it before is because they knew it wasn't going to look good and it'd have to be huge. Then they took a look at modern watch trends and said "fuck it" and just jammed as much as they could into the movement and just worked the aesthetics around that.
The hand carved leaves and shit were just additional dick waving.

>>9781282
With an unreliable Chinese copy of an already barely acceptable Japanese movement? Yeah, nah. I know first hand that the DG28 is dildos and isn't worth more than 50 bucks.

[Anonymous No.9781305]

>>9781287
It's also worth noting that the Seiko is of course more expensive than the replica Rolex.
The difference is about $50.
(The Rolex is $100, Seiko is $150 both delivered to my front door)

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781308]

>>9781287
why do you assume i have a bad reputation?

/fa/ just hates me becuase i call people out when they post replicas

/g/ used to claim his watches were real and did so every thread until i called him out

he still holds a grudge and wanted to start comparing assets which I immediately won.

--------

that lawyer kid wanted to start an e-fight and turned out to be some fat kid who was poorly dressed in some target cardigan posting about his china watches

he was a kid not a attorney by trade its just his name

>>9781290
malaysia movt vs china movt not too much difference in quality

the rolex knock off will impress more poorfags than the seiko5

fake rolex not worth more than $50 but that seiko isn't worth more than $20

he gave 2 options, the fake rolex is the better one even if i detest counterfeits

[Anonymous No.9781314]

>>9781287
They're one of the most vertical companies
in the world. They compete with everybody from timex to patek.
There's also the fact that they're often better than Swiss alternatives within the same price bracket and cost less. And as far as affordables go, Seiko and its subsidiary Orient are basically unparalleled.
And they're arguably the most innovative, having pioneered both quartz and their current quartz-mechanical hybrid movement, the spring drive.
tl;dr nippu technorigy

[Anonymous No.9781315]

>>9781019
Dunno experimenting a little bit.
I don't like curved endlinks since they tame the sporty feel, and the mako's stock bracelet is frankly too plain and boring despite the good quality.
This one is cheap rattling folded shit but I like the look tbh

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781321]

>>9781305
he was alluding to the pre-owned value of the watches.

with that said no seiko5 should ever be purchased for more than $50

also 99.9% of the populace will not recognize that seiko as a homage

they will just assume it's a cheap walmart watch

[Anonymous No.9781325]

>>9781308
>>9781321
Oh no, just wanted to say I have heard of you before, in kind of a bad light maybe.
I really appreciate the straightforward answers.
Will go with the Rolex, post it in this thread when it arrives at my house probably broken.
Now for the last question:
Aliexpress, Intime, puretime or Toros?

[Anonymous No.9781326]

>>9781308
you caught me, none of my watches are real
I actually go through my watchmaker's garbage can and painstakingly glue parts onto broken movements so as to give people the impression that I am actually wearing a functional timepiece
or maybe you're just shitposting

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781330]

>>9781314
there is no seiko, credor, grand seiko w/e that competes with patek

seiko has some nice $500k watches like the minute repeater

but it doesn't compete with patek

that's like saying the acura NSX competes with a pagani zonda

not really

its a nice car for a japanese car blows korean cars out of the water but it's not a luxury product

it's just a consumer product

[/g/ No.9781334]

>>9781326
Forgot my name but you get the point.

>>9781330
do you want the long or short version of why this post is retarded?

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781336]

>>9781325
eh, most of these watch threads are populated by nerdy white kids who are of lower income and don't know about fashion

came over from the computer gaming side of the this forum and when they post pictures of their outfits its always just disgusting stone washed jeans and dadcore nonsense.

yeah, post your replica when you get it

you can see that the forum has a bunch of people with replicas

as for the last question, idk i don't really buy replicas not really into them, but i acknowledge they exist and serve a function

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781342]

>>9781334
Dude, you have man tits

i'll read your nonsense when you learn to write AKA get a degree.

not your tech school certificate that you're working on now

poor fag bogaaaannn

[/g/ No.9781345]

>>9781325
Toro is the easiest to deal with since he's not a chink. Puretime has a way bigger selection though.

[Anonymous No.9781356]

Could I pull off a beige perlon with this watch?
I apologize in advance for my horrible watch photography.

[/g/ No.9781366]

>>9781356
Beige? I'd say no. Black or brown.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781375]

>>9781356
not really, looks geeky on your wrist

just from your wrist alone it makes me feel that you're wearing some levis (not a good cut, probably like 501) some cheap polyester/cotton blend shitty tartan pattern shirt ross marketed as "flannel"

you probably have some dorky ass sneakers or some sort of internet meme shoe

but thats the extent of internet advice you've gotten and now think a watch will make you look "classy"

and wonder why nobody on tinder has swiped right yet

[I'm da Lawyer yo No.9781391]

>>9781308
>lawyer kid wanted to start an e-fight and turned out to be some fat kid who was poorly dressed in some target cardigan posting about his china watches he was a kid not a attorney by trade its just his name

You need to take your medicine Sieg, you're too high in niggercum and speedball that you can't even tell reality apart from your hallucinations.

Btw
>fat kid
I have a belly, that's all.

>poorly dressed in target cardigan
More like tailored made merino wool a d kashmir

>China watches
Just one, the rest are swiss and german

>not an attorney
WAT. You are so full of shit Sieg.

Now go suck on some pulsating nigger dick, you fucking imbecile, as you clearly have no other use than that.

>pic related, my AP Millenary 4101
Please tell me how could this be a fake nignog

>>9781194
Then, my good /g/man, could you post any from AL&S, AP, FPJ, VC, JLC or any other independents?
Thanks in advance m8.

[Anonymous No.9781392]

>>9781375
Why don't you fuck off and go shitpost some other thread where people might believe you actually have any knowledge about anything?

[Anonymous No.9781394]

>>9781345
Okay, so now it's the debate between $300 on Toros for a 'non-chink' one and $100 for one from Aliexpress.
Is that $200 worth it?

[Anonymous No.9781403]

>>9781394
Fucking buy the seiko you retard

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781404]

>>9781394
FWIW they're both from china

but they are made in different factories.

he said the customer service agent was not Chinese so easier to deal with

[I'm da Lawyer yo No.9781414]

>>9781325
>Believes any word Sieg says.
Don't fell for yhe troll dude. Sieg is like the mentally challenged kid of the group, licking his own shit stained fingers.

[Anonymous No.9781417]

>>9781366
A'ight.
Something along the line of this, perhaps?:
http://www.cheapestnatostraps.com/collections/perlon-straps/products/perlon-strap-dark-brown

>>9781375
I think you have some pent-up anger there, m8.

[Anonymous No.9781421]

[Anonymous No.9781423]

>>9781403
>>9781404
>>9781414
Okay what the fuck.
1. Do I buy the Rolex?
If yes; Aliexpress ($100) or Toros (for $300, fuck)
2. Do I buy the Seiko?
If yes; why the fuck should I buy that one? since it's $150

[/g/ No.9781424]

>>9781394
The $200 is the difference between the watch you get from some shady negro with watches in his jacket in an back alley and an actual good watch. Movements are completely different.

[Anonymous No.9781431]

>>9781424
But is the $200 worth it for probably another chink movement? That $200 could buy me 2 more if the first one breaks.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781441]

>>9781431
a $300 rolex knock off is probably a half decent watch on the inside.

one of the issues with fake watches is that you never know what you're getting on the inside could be a cheap movement, could be a packet of meth

personally i think the gamble is better than the seiko.

1: Seiko - Sealed Box of Junk, 0% chance of getting anything else.

2: Rolex - Mystery Box it could be filled with $100 bills it could be empty 50/50

[/g/ No.9781442]

>>9781431
It's ultimately your decision, but the chink movement in a $300 watch will actually be oiled instead of running on sawdust and Chinese children's tears. It's also going to be inherently better just because it's a good ETA design as opposed to a fairly shitty miyota design.

[I'm da Lawyer yo No.9781443]

>>9781423
Don't buy a replica. Buy something proud in its own merit and price range. If you are in no position to afford an expensive watch you don't have to, and of course, pretending is niggercore.

For example, I have very expensive watches, as some hwre can tell you, but I also have and appreciate affordable watches and I wear the quite often and I'm happy with them.

Between those two, buy the Seiko.
>Pic related, a Citizen I havw enjoyed very much as well. (Not my pic.)

[Anonymous No.9781447]

>>9781423
Buy whatever the fuck you want, it's your damn money. The Seiko is going to be pretty decent, the cheap fake is probably going to be a piece of shit and the expensive fake is probably going to be ok. Or just do whatever dumb bullshit Sieg tells you to do.

[/g/ No.9781450]

>>9781441
But it's not a mystery at all, you retard.

>>9781443
Seconding this, again.
Even if I have one.

[Anonymous No.9781452]

>>9781443
>Don't buy a replica. Buy something proud in its own merit and price range. If you are in no position to afford an expensive watch you don't have to, and of course, pretending is niggercore.
Sorry Lawyer-san, but that's a lot easier to say when you can actually afford the watches.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781457]

>>9781443
he wants a datejust

a seiko5 date just homage won't scratch his datejust itch.

a fake datejust is probably a better watch than some disposable seiko

seriously seiko 5's are like disposable razors

you're telling the guy to shave with a disposable razor until he can afford an electric shaver

it's just bad advice because the BIC disposable won't last that long

i'm telling him to buy a "double edge razor shave set" which had the ability to last awhile or may not it depends on what he buys

[Pony Cum Jar Project Guy No.9781458]

>>9781234
I know you're mentally retarded. But you're suppose to screw the crown in to ensure fully water resistance.

[Anonymous No.9781463]

>>9781452
Anyone can afford a seiko and Seiko is a great brand ffs

[Anonymous No.9781464]

>>9781452
This is a point for me too.
As someone who can't afford such a nice watch a replica/homage is the closest I can get, and Tudors are still $500.

>>9781450
You bought a replica before, would you do it again? Would you be as happy with the Seiko as with the replica Rolex? I think the Rolex is the better choice for long-term happiness instead of compromising for the Seiko.

>>9781447
I don't like your negativity but appreciate the input.

[Anonymous No.9781469]

cop?

[Anonymous No.9781473]

>>9781457
You are a real asshole and a bully sometimes but you are pretty spot on the rest of the time.
I appreciate your input.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781475]

>>9781458
you think counterfeit watches have the same water resistance rating as what's specified on a real watch?

screw down crown and printed resistance is just for show

[Anonymous No.9781476]

>>9781464
>As someone who can't afford such a nice watch a replica/homage is the closest I can get
In my opinion there's a big difference between replicas and homages.
I don't mind people buying homages, but I don't like people buying replicas as they are pretending to be a high end brand while they are not.

[I'm da Lawyer yo No.9781482]

>>9781452
>>9781464
Youre totally right, it's easier.
But that doesn't make it any less true.
And, if you ever get discriminated by the watch you wear drop me a call and we'll sue his ass like there is no tomorrow.
>I do believe this.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781488]

>>9781476
my only issue is that if he buys the rolex knock off and then tries to sell it to someone as if it were a real watch

but if he buys a knockoff just to wear/mess around with

i don't care

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781503]

>>9781482
too bad "watch discrim" is not a thing

and civil litigation only works in cases of protected classes

IE gender discrim case where the male is plaintiff likely to get dismissed and waste of time

[Anonymous No.9781513]

>>9781464
Sorry about the negativity, I just hate it when sieg shows up and successfully gets everyone to respond to his dumb incoherent spaced out incomplete sentence bullshit.

I just want to talk about copper plated movements like >>9781278 and pic related. Copper plating is my fetish. Let's see if Sieg tries to tell me it's rose gold just like he tries to tell everyone that Seiko 5s are acrylic.

[Anonymous No.9781517]

>>9781464
I don't have time to actually write out a reply but the short answer is yes I would buy one again and yes I like it more than my Seiko 5, but I'd take a Seiko 5 over a cheap replica.

[/g/ No.9781522]

>>9781517
Forgot name again
Phones suck

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781527]

>>9781513
im just going to recommend cardio

posing for pics with your tits out as if you are doing a dead lift but make it evident you just lift it half way...once isn't going to make ya buff

especially after you down a "protein shake" that has like 30 grams of sugar per scoop after the whole charade

fucking nesquick with whey protein in it

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781529]

>>9781522
it took you 9 years after they were introduced into the market to buy your first smart phone LOL

NOW THATS WHAT I CALL POOR

[Anonymous No.9781530]

>>9781522
I could interpret that in two ways;
- You like your Seiko watch more than a cheaper replica (even though you enjoy it more) and thus advice me to buy a Seiko
- You like your Seiko watch more than a cheaper replica thus buying a more expensive replica would be the way to go.

My reading comprehension is gone after a long day at work.

[Anonymous No.9781532]

>>9781503
What is wrong with you why are you here even.

[Anonymous No.9781545]

>>9781527
I'm not /g/ and I've never namefagged unnecessarily because I'm not a tremendous faggot seeking recognition and respect on an anonymous forum, but nice try.

[Anonymous No.9781557]

>>9781391
>"I'M NOT FAT, I JUST HAVE A MASSIVE BELLY!"

I kek'd. How's the view up there on Mount Cuck?

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781578]

>>9781557
i can see the fat fuck saying it all snarky too like he thinks he is saying something witty

[I'm da Lawyer yo No.9781584]

>>9781557
>Trying to pick on the guy that speaks with honesty and doesn't hide the truth, even if it's no the best and also accepts himself as it is.
You done goofed dude.

[Anonymous No.9781591]

>>9781530
Welp no answer then.
I'll maul it over tomorrow morning.
I was expecting spending $100-150, the $300 replica is quite much.

Have a nice day Anons and namefags, thanks for all your help!

[Anonymous No.9781597]

>>9781578
Thank you for fucking this thread up. When will you finally grow out of this board and do something with your life (please end it) you autistic fuck?

[Anonymous No.9781600]

>>9781584
>"YOU DUN GOOFED, NOT WATCH THIS CUCKMEISTER DOWN ANOTHER TWELVE DONUTS TO PRESERVE THE PRISTINE NON-FATNESS OF HIS MASSIVE NON-FAT BELLY!"

You have reached peak cuck.

[I'm da Lawyer yo No.9781639]

>>9781600
Can't even understand what you're trying to say. You think you accomplished something, but you didin't, you just make me laugh. Give it a rest, won't you?

[Anonymous No.9781657]

>>9781639
>Can't even understand what you're trying to say.

If only words were deep-fried instead of spoken.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781661]

>>9781639
basically he is saying you're unattractive

and the females that you're attracted to have sex with others who are not you

[Anonymous No.9781672]

>cars are for drivers
>drivers
>the making of which is a craft that has been refined through generations of whites
>virtually exclusive to white countries until international commerce became a thing and the japs got into the business and nipnonged car technology
>blacks can't even afford good ones, and when they can they buy the worst ones possible for their money kek

Thats how you sound breh.
Keep clinging to your outdated uneffay technology.

[Anonymous No.9781674]

Here's a short list of Lawyer's top 5 movies.

1. The Cuckinator
2. Cuckatar
3. Cuckvengers: Age of Cucktron
4. Goldencuck
5. Cuckception

[Anonymous No.9781678]

>>9781421
Is there supposed to be something wrong with this?
Can't afford a Panerai?

[Anonymous No.9781679]

>>9781674
>>9781661
>>9781657
Samefagging so fucking obvious

[Anonymous No.9781685]

>>9781672
>>9781142
Meant to quote you

[Anonymous No.9781697]

>>9781661
You know from experience, ya?

[Anonymous No.9781707]

Lawyer's top 5 foods:

1. Donut
2. Two donuts
3. Three donuts
4. Frozen donuts
5. 5-course deep-fried donut meal served with an exquisite '93 donut shake

[Anonymous No.9781725]

List of Lawyer's top 5 non-fat body parts:

1. Totally non-fat thighs
2. Supberbly non-fat cankles
3. Massively non-fat cheek
4. Supremely non-fat ass
5. A belly so utterly non-fat its non-fatness collapsed in on itself creating a singularity that enables him to time travel through spacetime effectively that he can down a pizza in the past and escape back to the future before the calories hit his hips

[None !love/ozosc No.9781737]

>>9781674
>>9781707
>>9781725

List of what you're doing:

1. Shitposting

[Anonymous No.9781751]

>>9781737
Use this.

Good luck.

[Anonymous No.9781757]

>>9781678
I just find it slightly silly seemingly how seemingly every paneristi obsesses over straps, some with buckles as large as a sekio 5.
>All these straps
>None are particularly worn
>Watch isn't on any
It's almost like the person likes and cares more about collecting rare straps and showing them off online more than wearing the watch or its heritage.
Quite some do look pretty good though.

[None !love/ozosc No.9781759]

>>9781751
Use this.

Good luck.

[Anonymous No.9781762]

>>9781142
>blacks can't even afford good ones, and when they can they buy the worst ones possible for their money
Is casio f-91w a good one or worst one?

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781763]

>>9781725
he's not fat he's just horizontally challenged, and just happens to weigh more than everyone becuase of his poor life choices and aversion to physical activity which shortens his life span

it's not unhealthy or fat or anything

[Anonymous No.9781766]

>>9781759
DROPAIDS
R
O
P
A
I
D
S

[Anonymous No.9781770]

>>9781763
Uh, aren't you kinda on the chubby side yourself?

[Anonymous No.9781793]

>>9781762
Please respond

[/g/ No.9781797]

>>9781391
I've got a few lange webms about some of their complications. I'll post them once I'm not on my phone. I'll see if I can find any good videos from some of the smaller guys but I've looked before and I didn't see anything

>>9781763
the fact that you try to talk shit about me too makes me kek

[/g/ No.9781801]

>>9781762
Good for price but kind of a piece of shit.

[Anonymous No.9781808]

>>9781801
What's a good watch? I don't want to be that guy you described.

[Anonymous No.9781810]

This thread was such a riot.
Sieg bringing the shitstorm to /fa/ since 2009
Keep it up nig

[/g/ No.9781825]

>>9781808
Something from the bottom, ideally. Personal favorite is the SARB series. If you have to get something from the top I'd recommend the Orients the most.

[Anonymous No.9781828]

>>9781797
Your tits are fanastic.

[Anonymous No.9781848]

>>9781828
thx bb
Let's actually talk about watches now
These threads have kind of turned into trip/namefag shitfests
I'm going to stop namefagging because it gets too shitposty

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9781852]

>>9781797
someone didn't put their weights away

let me grab a pic for 4chan real quick

they're going to be so impressed with my gym fit and my seiko5

[Anonymous No.9781873]

>>9781852
The guy was just getting a drink.

[JosefStalin No.9781951]

I actaully love sieg, he never takes cracks at me though, I feel like a school girl that has to try and get his attention.

[Anonymous No.9781964]

Thoughts? Dunno if cop

[Anonymous No.9782156]

>>9781964
>wearing a bracelet next to a watch ever

why do people do this?

[Anonymous No.9782160]

>>9782156
pitti uomo

[Anonymous No.9782195]

Wittnauer watch my dad gave to me. Anyone know the specific model?

[Anonymous No.9782203]

Which Seiko do I cop, The SKX009 or the SNZF15?

[Anonymous No.9782300]

>>9782203

If you do any outdoor activities in or around water definitely go for the SKX009. It's a proper ISO certified dive watch while the Seiko 5 doesn't even have a screw down crown. If that doesn't matter and you just like the style then go with whichever is cheaper.

[Anonymous No.9782355]

>>9781964
>>9781964
You know what, I know its just a wannabe rolex, but I like that watch.

[Anonymous No.9782371]

[Anonymous No.9782380]

>>9781757
What company makes the eagle ones?

[Anonymous No.9782423]

>>9782380
I looked it up and found that those apparently aren't belonging to the original strap (which run $260) but are "personalized Eagle buckles made by Rob Montana".
Considering how gigantic they are I'm guessing it looks rather stupid, I mean just compare it to the OEM panerai buckle here>>9781421 (smallest one)

[Anonymous No.9782438]

>>9782371
w2c?

[Anonymous No.9782446]

[Anonymous No.9782470]

>>9782438

Chrono24, eBay, the 1970's

[Anonymous No.9782480]

are g-shocks fa

[Anonymous No.9782490]

>>9782480

Not really but they are good tough ass watches.

[Anonymous No.9782496]

>>9782480
no.

[I'm da Lawyer yo No.9782507]

>>9781873
Thanks for the webmd /g/man. I liked it very much.

Please post more m8.

[Anonymous No.9782518]

>>9782507
What Panerai ref is it you have now again?

[Anonymous No.9782560]

>>9782480
They can be, some of their various collabs are breddy gud. They're functional as hell too.

[Anonymous No.9782590]

>>9782446
watch is mall core shit
and please don't tell me you actually put that stupid hat on your head

[Anonymous No.9782682]

Besides this being ugly in general, is this a guys watch or a girls? I honestly can't tell because it is slightly smaller than a mid sized men's watch and the colors seem off. Possibly a fake?

[Anonymous No.9782706]

got someone who will sell me pick related for $450 should i cop?

[Anonymous No.9782729]

What's the BEST watch maker?

[Anonymous No.9782747]

>>9782729
BEST at what?
No one is objectively best at everything, but some are at some specific things.

[Anonymous No.9782769]

Thinking about getting

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mens-Seiko-Quartz-Alaska-Gold-Nugget-Watch-/281671488560?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4194edd430

Any thoughts?

[Anonymous No.9782825]

>>9781096
I like the palette of your sleeves to your hand. It's like deep sea, to shallow sea, to the pier, to the sand that is your hand.

[Anonymous No.9782848]

>>9782825
I really, really liked this comment!
+1 points

[Anonymous No.9782866]

>>9782729
There are only a few things that can be objectively measured.
Patek is the best at jamming lots of complications into watches.
Rolex is the best at marketing/brand recognition.
Seiko is the best at pioneering new technology.
Rolex is the best at waterproofing.
I can't think of anything else objective. On the more subjective side, urban jurgensen's dials are currently considered to be the best, I'm pretty sure RGM does the best guilloche, and Franck Muller makes the best watches for that greasy sex offender uncle everybody has.

[Anonymous No.9782867]

>>9779787
le sherlock watch

[Anonymous No.9782893]

>>9782866
nothing is objective

[Anonymous No.9782940]

>>9782893
le postmodernist face

[WatchmakerAnon No.9783124]

>>9781513
Did somebody say copper plated movements? I do love my Speedy's 861.

[Anonymous No.9783225]

>>9783124
Is that pre-Moon? IIRC they started with rose gold plating for the cal.861 in the 70s.

[WatchmakerAnon No.9783269]

>>9783225
Its a Mark II. As far as I know it uses copper plating.

[Anonymous No.9783379]

>>9783269
classic speedmaster is best speedmaster

[Anonymous No.9783395]

>>9783225
They're not rose gold, they're copper plated. The rose gold thing is a bunch of bullshit. Were the early speedys plain steel? Because I know Omega has been doing copper plating on at least some of their movements since like the 30s.

[Anonymous No.9783406]

>>9782682
Doubt someone would fake a ~$100 vintage watch.

[Anonymous No.9783839]

should i proceed on buying this?

[Anonymous No.9783893]

>>9783839

Orient makes quality watches so if you like it go for it.

[Anonymous No.9783975]

New mod.

[JosefStalin No.9784266]

>tfw I will probably never get the chance to own one of these

One day I will get there, one day

[Anonymous No.9784417]

>>9783124
>Copper plated movements
You rang?

[Anonymous No.9784420]

>>9783975
Looks good, what bezel is that? Need a new one for mine. Need a new strap as well, currently got some hideous green, red and black one on (bout that gucci lyfe), and the other ones I have are all worn to shit.

[Anonymous No.9784516]

This is my first (and only) watch

Is it /fa/?

[Anonymous No.9784521]

This is my first (and only) watch

Is it /fa/?

[Anonymous No.9784571]

Thought for a different strap on this?

[Anonymous No.9784588]

>>9782590
I love you, that response was so worthy of that picture.

[Anonymous No.9784594]

>>9784571
Something like this, possibly brown or light grey if you're seriously effay.
How often do you check the day there rather than your phone?

[Anonymous No.9784768]

>>9784594
Wut? WUT?!

[Anonymous No.9784780]

>>9784594
i check the day on there probably 3/4 times a week and not on my phone since when music is playing the date and date doesnt appear on screen

[Anonymous No.9784797]

>>9781326
The surprised clown face watch.
>>9781421
Those buckles are stupid huge.

[Anonymous No.9784817]

[Anonymous No.9785060]

>>9779808

Lolhistory. Unless you are getting an important historical vintage watch or a modern continuation of one, an early Seiko Chronograph, a Zenith El Primero or a Patek Perpetual Calendar for example, you arent buying into anything more than what a microbrand sells, an generic movement with a case over it. Only exception would be an inhouse movement, but that only comes into play in priceranges far over what most microbrands offer.

[Anonymous No.9785075]

>>9779715

Still 1 month to go for shipping

[Anonymous No.9785088]

>>9781096

Melbourne Watch Company has really good models, like the Portsea and the Flinders.

[Anonymous No.9785105]

>>9781194

Does microrotor have any advantge over standard full rotor? Other than better view of the movement ofc.

[Anonymous No.9785106]

>>9785075

If that wasn't open heart I would seriously consider buying one.

[Anonymous No.9785143]

Need advice /fa/
I want a new, nice chronograph and if possible automatic.

Thinking about pic related as well as

[Anonymous No.9785148]

>>9785143

this one, even though it isn't automatic.
Other suggestions?

[Anonymous No.9785167]

>>9785143

price limit?

[Anonymous No.9785183]

Seagull 1963 air force

[Anonymous No.9785185]

>>9784521

Ye

[Anonymous No.9785190]

>>9785106

I actually thought the same, but the price was right and the open heart actually comes into play with the whole aviation theme.

[Anonymous No.9785192]

>>9785167

1k$

[Anonymous No.9785371]

>>9785192

If you don't mind going grey market there are a handful of Hamilton's that can be had for around the $1,000 mark.There is the Seagull 1963. Strela which uses the Poljot 3133 movement. You might also want to look into watches that have the Seiko 6T63 or VK64 mecaquartz movement.

[Anonymous No.9785392]

>>9785148
I really like the Certina, and I'm considering to buy the same.. I don't like the Tissot.

I'm not exactly a fan of the green accenting, though. If you like it, that's fine. I'm looking at the one with the red hands and indexing.

By all indications on the internet, it seems that the Certina is a great watch.

[Anonymous No.9785400]

>>9784817
literally reddit: the watch

>>9785371
literally reddit2: the watch boogaloo

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9785430]

>>9785371
at this point why don't you guys just go full reddit?

wear your little clarks desert boots, your cute little undersized pointer work jackets with the lil puppy in the logo, gap chinos

talk with a "witty" tone and make a bunch of puns that only you find funny.....make random walking dead references 24/7

upbeat as fuck for no reason

most likely mormon

and just stop thinking

blank mind, blank soul all you do all day is mindlessly exude puns and " i wish my girlfriend would do that" type shit

just become that dorky lower middle class white kid who gets married to the first bitch that gets his dick wet

[Anonymous No.9785436]

>>9785430
Sieg. . . I really like you, my man. You're the best.

[Anonymous No.9785442]

>>9785430
>most likely mormon
10/10 would read again.

[Anonymous No.9785461]

>>9785430
>>9785436
>>9785442

This is like seeing a schizophrenic patient talk to himself.

[Anonymous No.9785463]

Watch photography: The disgrace

[Anonymous No.9785480]

>>9785430

toothygrin/10

[Anonymous No.9785488]

>>9785463
Apply yourself: http://blog.mingthein.com/2012/03/05/watch-photography-part-one-introduction/

[Anonymous No.9785515]

Does Seiko still make any divers with big cushion cases like these? I love when the case sort of spills over past the bezel on the sides of the watch. It seems like the only current watch that's even close is >>9785488 with the 4 oclock crown and the big sloping lugs that flow into the crown guard. It seems like the two types of case that they currently make are stuff like the Sumo and the non-tuna marinemasters which have no crownguards at all and the tunas which are cool in their own right but are completely different.

[Anonymous No.9785556]

>>9781441

Oh god.. This is the first time I've been on /fa/ and even on 4chan in years and I can already figure out who the retarded namefag is..

[Anonymous No.9785566]

>>9779715
Only microband watch i own. ETA 2824-2 movement, ceramic inlay, saphire glass and screwed links. It´s very good value for money (410 Euro).

[Anonymous No.9785643]

>>9785566
Is Steinhart even a microbrand anymore? I really want one of those though, I just wish they were 40mm rather than 42mm but I'll probably get one eventually anyway.

[Anonymous No.9785774]

>>9785643
Should be. It´s a rather small brand with direct marketing only. The Steinhart is a tad bigger than the Rolex submariner, if you are interested to compare sizes i can do some shots next week. At least two colleagues wear those when they work frontend.

[Anonymous No.9785822]

>>9785774
The styling is closer to the older sub but it's about the size of the newer sub, right? The Steinhart also seems to have pretty long flat lugs A comparison would be neat if you can do that.

[Anonymous No.9786267]

>>9781759

cunt

[Anonymous No.9786290]

>>9785566

Watch it, you're being targeted by snipers.

[Anonymous No.9786319]

>>9785566
I really want a Steinhart i think they look beautiful. I don't know how I feel about them being such a blatant rolex rip off.

Have you had to explain to anyone yet that it isn't actually a rolex ?


I really want a black ceramic or a pepsi gmt

[Anonymous No.9786834]

>>9784521
Which model is that

[Anonymous No.9786851]

>>9786834
It's a SNDC33

Literally 20 seconds in google after typing "Seiko Chronograph"

[Anonymous No.9787249]

What's a fairly cheap (I'd prefer around $200 but I can stretch it a bit if I have to) Submariner homage with a nice cyclops on it? I really like them for some reason. Preferrably something avalible in a pepsi colorway as well but that might be asking a bit much

>tfw want a real submariner
>can't afford it

When I get my masters degree in a few years I'm definitely treating myself.

[Anonymous No.9787250]

what does fa think of Breguet as a brand and this watch in particular?

Any knowledgeable watch folk?

[Anonymous No.9787267]

>>9787250
One of the great, historic marques that is, unfortunately, owned by Swatch.

Wearing/Owning one is highly prestigious.

[Anonymous No.9787291]

Anyone here has a vocaroo or something so I can hear how loud the Weekender actually is?

[JosefStalin No.9787294]

>>9787249
If you are specifically after a cyclops, alpha and invicta make models with them in your price range, I can't remember the model names, use google.

[Anonymous No.9787446]

Sub C "Hulk" Ref. 116610 & GMT Master II "Batman" Ref. 116710

[Anonymous No.9787509]

>>9787446
You whore...I mean that in the nicest way possible.

[Anonymous No.9787558]

most recent purchase.

[Anonymous No.9787682]

>>9787446
>batman
Hi adriqos
>hulk
Daily reminder that CW C60 is nicer looking

[Anonymous No.9787702]

>>9781326
>sweats when people ask you what time is it

[Anonymous No.9787756]

Any recs for colorful watches?

[Anonymous No.9787759]

>>9787756

[Anonymous No.9787768]

is there any good diver for twig manlet wrists?

[Anonymous No.9787798]

meh its overpriced but it looks nice

[Anonymous No.9787800]

>>9787756

Repostan from the /fa/ thread

So far so good. The dial is gorgeous, plenty of little neat details like the hour disk color change, the 3 layer sandwich dial, the brushed lugs and bezel and polished sides in the case actually following around the bracelet and the colored caseback display crystal. The bracelet is pretty good but
unfortunatly isnt completly solid as it has hollow centerlinks . The PVD coating has survived a couple hits and scrapes unscathed, but the crystal already picked up a little scratch, but that is expected with mineral glass.

Only thing that annoys me is the lack of hacking, which due to my lazyness has prevented me from checking the accuracy exactly. Its probably in the +-8 sec/day range, but cant confirm.

[Anonymous No.9787803]

>>9787800

Forgot to say that the repost is recomending the watch you posted

[Anonymous No.9787813]

I just saw that Massdrop currently has the Orient Ray for $100. If you might be interested you better hurry up because when they did the Bambino for that price it sold out in like a day.

[Anonymous No.9787816]

Poorfag here who isnt willing to pay more than 100$ on a watch. But this watch looks nice and im not a watch person but i really like this one.
Its a nixon for 95$ and was wondering if maybe you guys could suggest anyother watches similar to this under 100$ but not lower than 30$ also
Cop or not?

[Anonymous No.9787834]

>>9787816
Unreadable black on black mnmlst overpriced fashion watch quartz bullshit. The movement is probably a cheap Chinese piece of shit worth a few cents and the black coating is poorly done and will flake off. Probably decent enough for the rest of /fa/ to use in their dope fits, but as far as real serious watches go that's a dogshit watch and /watch/ does not approve at all.

If you want something decent and groupthink approved then check out this guide >>9781825

[JosefStalin No.9787908]

>>9787816
You have to decide if you want Quartz or automatic, if you are after Quartz look at lorus and pulsar. If you are after an automatic you should look at orient and Vostok. You will have to go a touch over your budget for orient and Vostok are slav watches but are in your budget and half decent quality for the price, it appears you are a fan of minimalism, you a fan of this? If will run slightly above your budget

[Anonymous No.9787958]

>>9784266
I used to look at Grand Seiko's as some hidden eastern gem that was too good for snobby Swiss watch owners, but I lately I can't help but look at the stuff that Rolex puts out and think that their designs are simply more interesting. Grand Seiko's just seem a little too clean for a watch at that price.

Although I have to admit that there's nothing quite like that textured dial on the snowflake.

[Anonymous No.9788010]

>>9787958
Well I think the very understated look is part of the appeal. It's very plain at first glance and from a distance it's practically indistinguishable from a plain boring cheap watch, but the closer you get to it and the more you pay attention, the more you start to see the insane attention to detail that was put into the watch and all the care that went into perfecting the simple design. I don't think it's meant to wow people, it's something you wear for your own sake. Nobody else is going to notice how the power reserve is cut deeply into the dial and has 3 different textures on it that are totally different from the main dial texture. They won't know that the case and bracelet are an amazing titanium alloy that has the same bright shine of stainless steel and a scratch-resistant coating because in the end they pull it off so well that it just looks like any other stainless steel. Only you will notice all those details when you're sitting at home jerking off to your watch with a loupe.

I can see the appeal in both types of watch, I guess. Anyone will see a nice shiny sub or dj or GMT or whatever and appreciate that it's an elegant iconic design, and it is.

[JosefStalin No.9788016]

>>9787958
Considering we are on a website dedicated to weaboo shit, I think that seiko have a bit of support around here. They only started becoming a non obscure option for a high end watch as of recent, I think they offer great value for money, a very interesting watch to have in a collection, I just have to hope one day I will have the right funds for one

[Anonymous No.9788040]

>>9787558
Looks good.
>>9787759
I actually like it, nice aesthetics

[Anonymous No.9788053]

>>9787908
Well minimalism is cool and all but im not strictly looking for that. Nothing too crowded in the watch itself if i make sense.
Just something black steel and within that price range.
Quartz or automatic are fine.
Something like that size.
I think above 40 mm ??

[Anonymous No.9788070]

>>9785822
No second hands?

[Anonymous No.9788075]

>>9788070
Do you see the blur of lume? That's the second hand moving in a 25-second exposure. Pic related is a 30 second exposure.

[Anonymous No.9788079]

>>9788070
>>9788075
Also notice how the minute hands are a little blurred because they moved a tiny bit during the photo.

[Anonymous No.9788093]

>>9788053
>I think above 40 mm ??
No, unless you've got massive 8+ inch wrists you do not need above 40mm. Do not buy a black coated watch either. At that price they are cheaply done and will wear off quickly. Just find a Seiko or Citizen you like in your price range. Those are both reliable brands to go with.

[JosefStalin No.9788122]

>>9788053
The black coating on watches in your price range will be shitty. I'd reccomend this if you are after all black, it's a black leather strap but I think that will be the only way you can achieve the black aesthetic without having a shitty bracelet

[Anonymous No.9788150]

>>9785822
Quite right. I love the older syling so i am happy with Steinharts decision to do one in a modern and bigger size. Will take some shots if the colleagues don´t mind me doing so.

[Anonymous No.9788191]

>>9786319
Last time was two weeks ago when my "nice submariner" got complimented by russian clients and one from the states.
It is actually no wonder as Rolex´s design is widely recognized even by people who aren´t into watches. I know of a colleage who exchange his expensive one to a Rolex if he deals with people in China as they can allocate it a lot better then other swiss brands.
I don´t think the hommage/copy stance of Steinhart an issue. Peole who don´t know will see a nice watch on your wrist or mistake it for a rolex, and people who are into watches see a timepiece that got all the basics down without wasting a lot of money on branding.

[Anonymous No.9788459]

>>9783269
How much was it?

[Anonymous No.9788478]

>>9788191
I guess. I think I'm more concerned with people thinking I'm wearing a "fake" rolex when it's a legitimately good watch in it's own right.

I'm 25 and work in science. Kinda work you do for the love of science rather than the money so at this point in my career there is no way I'd be wearing a watch that costs a good few grand on my wrist

[Anonymous No.9788517]

So I'm currently rocking this Mondaine and I really love the simple look of the face. Minimal, yet striking.
I was wonderen if /fa/ could point me in the direction of some other classy yet simple designs.

[Anonymous No.9788522]

>>9781423
Whatever you do, for the love of god don't buy from aliexpress.
Their replicas are dogshite.

[Anonymous No.9788532]

>>9787798
if by "nice" you mean "generic"

[Anonymous No.9788537]

>>9788517
Bauhaus-shit etc etc.
Here you go:
http://www.good-stuffs.com/Classic-Rodina-automatic-wrist-watch-OEM-by-Sea-Gull-ST17_p_156.html

[Anonymous No.9788600]

>>9788478
I wouldnt worry so much. I work with luxury cars and never got frowned upon the steinhart. I even had some nice talks with colleagues who love to wear considerably more expensive timepiece.
And if you dont like it you can sell it without problems, they hold their value very well.

[Anonymous No.9788604]

I was thinking of buy a working, cheap movement and fitting it to a case myself, but I have no idea how I'd go about it.
Are there any good guides? How difficult is it? Would it be worth it just taking it to a shop and having someone do it for me?

[Anonymous No.9789324]

which watch?
i'm feelin the full silver would be best, not sure

[Anonymous No.9789333]

>>9789324
Please be kidding

[Anonymous No.9789339]

>>9789333
what's wrong. i don't feel like wasting $500+ on an accessory.

[Anonymous No.9789349]

>>9789339
But you feel like wasting $200 on a shitty accessory.

[Anonymous No.9789355]

>>9789339
Whatever you're paying for that you're wasting

[Anonymous No.9789359]

>>9789355
>>9789349
so what's wrong with the watch i posted

[Anonymous No.9789365]

>>9780122
>calling people that they have shit taste
>wears iscat watch

Lol, watches are the only accepted accesories for men. Why fuck it up


Also enjoy charging evryday you fucking sheep

[Anonymous No.9789369]

>>9789359
It's a bad watch.
Both in my subjective opinion (aesthetically) and objectively, as it has shitty movement and materials for the price.

[Anonymous No.9789370]

[Anonymous No.9789472]

>>9789324
The design is alright. The real problem is it's overpriced, if don't really care about watches and like the design, i guess you can buy it and be happy with it. If you look at Seiko, orient etc you can probably find similar watches for a better price and better quality.

[Sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9789505]

>>9788600
Doesn't matter if you wrench of a Ferrari or a Kia you're still a mechanic.

Doesn't matter if you fold prada sweaters or Abercrombie sweaters you're still working for minimum wage low skill low value.

I hate it when plebs think they're high and mighty on their 35k a year salary

[Anonymous No.9789509]

>>9789370
lol.

[Anonymous No.9789565]

>>9789505
And I hate it when low skill low value trust fund babbies are high and mighty on their anonymous chinese cartoon forum internet tough guy persona.

Anyways
>>9788600
Is the cyclops any good? I've heard that it barely magnifies and looks like it belongs on a $5 fake Rolex which is kind of disappointing. I much prefer no-date subs and sub homages because I'm not a fan of cyclopses, but if I do buy that Steinhart then I would rather not have to remove the cyclops. I know there are a few similar Steinharts with a date and no cyclops, and they don't look right to me.

[Anonymous No.9789596]

Just brought.

[Anonymous No.9789611]

>>9789596
Return that shit, carreras are the only half decent watches tag makes and even that is only some of them.

[Anonymous No.9789621]

>>9789596
Still got the receipt?

[Anonymous No.9789653]

>>9789596
Tag Whore is garbage.

[Anonymous No.9789678]

Ugliest Rolex reporting in

[Anonymous No.9789766]

>>9789505
Beg your pardon. I am not quite sure what i did to get you agitated. I only said that noone will take offence in wearing a homage watch even at jobs where status indicators might factor in more.

>>9789565
I personally have no problem on the magnification and angle, it´s 1.5 as with all the homage watches.

I think the percieved "weak" magnification is a combination of the facts that the lense is quite larger than the one on the submariner, filling less space and smaller prints on the date dial of the ETA .

[Anonymous No.9789793]

>>9789766
Somehow it never even occurred to me that the apparent difference might be because of the size of the actual date window rather than the cyclops. Thanks, that answers that. I guess I would just have to deal with it then.

[Anonymous No.9789820]

>>9789596
Where did you bring it ?

[Anonymous No.9789821]

>>9789793
It is weaker than the 2.5 of the rolex, i know no homage that manages that level of magnification. But it´s no worse than the other competitors within the price range.

[Anonymous No.9789840]

>>9789821
I think Squale gets the cyclops right, but it's also almost $200 more expensive, in the US at least.

[Anonymous No.9789844]

We passed 300

[Anonymous No.9789855]

>>9789844
Someone already made a thread with the wrong subject line, I guess we can move there:
>>9789108
>>9789108

[Anonymous No.9791360]

>>9789596
worthless now that you bought it
(not because of you, though, no hard feelings, right, bro?)