[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

File: 23 KB, 700x400, stan-smith-af1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

9705222

Stan Smith vs. Air Force 1 Low Anonymous Tue Apr 14 19:57:03 2015 No.9705222 [Reply] [Original]

Stan Smith vs. Air Force 1 Low
Which one?

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 14 20:01:18 2015 No.9705243 >>9705222 Stan Smiths for sure, AF1 are over used and I personally like the design of the Stans better

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 14 20:30:27 2015 No.9705316 >>9705222 >>9705243 Seconded, stan smiths are goat, much better than af1

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 14 20:36:11 2015 No.9705333 File: 41 KB, 530x477, 083532[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9705222 In best case scenario smiths, but both models are played out to death. Puma's court star trainers are worth checking out

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 14 20:36:26 2015 No.9705334 >>9705316 >>9705243 i'm going to agree. honestly i think they're just more versatile.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 14 20:38:06 2015 No.9705338 >>9705222 i bought a pair of AF1's last week and tbh I kind of regret it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 14 20:39:31 2015 No.9705342 >>9705222 Stan smiths are for lameboys, no wonder reddit loves them so much

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 14 20:40:25 2015 No.9705345 I see everyone walking around with these fucking white shoes all the time, what's somebody got to do to change up the game around here

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 14 20:41:23 2015 No.9705351 >>9705222 AF1s are for manlets with small feet

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 14 21:23:37 2015 No.9705514 File: 14 KB, 306x306, 11084837_372235522968875_471911315_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] white mountaineering smiths

>>	Anonymous Tue Apr 14 22:43:07 2015 No.9705801 >>9705338 Why? They cost like $90

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 00:09:07 2015 No.9706136 File: 114 KB, 540x960, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] NB crt300

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 01:15:34 2015 No.9706403 >>9706136 my nigga

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 01:17:44 2015 No.9706409 >>9706136 here come about 50 w2c's

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 01:25:27 2015 No.9706432 >>9705222 why no both poorboi

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 01:29:44 2015 No.9706443 >>9705222 AF1 are teenage nigger tier now

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 01:30:04 2015 No.9706445 stans. the AF1s are ugly and are wore by white girls

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 01:32:09 2015 No.9706451 >>9706443 Haven't they always been?

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 01:52:46 2015 No.9706506 File: 51 KB, 500x333, newbelans.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9706136 Oh snap!

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 01:58:33 2015 No.9706521 Nikes are for blacks,ew.

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 02:15:50 2015 No.9706564 man why does Adidas have to fuck up a perfectly good shoe with that bit of colour on the back/tongue. Hideous.

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 02:19:07 2015 No.9706574 >>9706564 Agreed. They refuse to make a shoe one color.

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 03:22:16 2015 No.9706743 AF1 mids.

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 03:26:55 2015 No.9706756 I would rather the af1s. Stan smiths are way too unathletic looking. I don't wear sneakers that I don't work out in. Stan smiths are only versatile if you use your sneakers like an old man would.

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 03:28:21 2015 No.9706761 >>9706574 Barneys sells an all white one you ignoramus. I don't even fucking like stans and I know that.

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 03:28:46 2015 No.9706763 >>9705222 Green on the back of the Smiffs really make the shoe more limiting. Suppose you're wearing a shirt or jacket with a color which doesn't look good with green, or you're wearing pants which would look odd next to the green. What happens then?

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 03:29:14 2015 No.9706764 File: 12 KB, 500x500, B26101_04_standard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Adidas Hyke or

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 03:29:24 2015 No.9706765 get af1s instead

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 03:33:36 2015 No.9706774 File: 32 KB, 540x390, rodlaver_tournament_5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9706764 Rod lavers Tournament Edition (but these are hard to come by)

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 04:29:01 2015 No.9706922 >>9705514 Lazy collab imo

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 04:35:38 2015 No.9706943 >>9706765 kek

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 04:41:43 2015 No.9706954 some girl on the train the other day would not stop staring at my primeknit stan smiths, I really don't get it

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 04:45:56 2015 No.9706970 >>9706763 they do a navy one which is goat tbh

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 05:40:45 2015 No.9707143 File: 3.86 MB, 3000x2000, shutuphoe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I say this all the time but AJ1s look way better than AF1s AF1 have the ugliest toe I've ever seen.

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 05:58:52 2015 No.9707183 >>9705333 Obnoxious rip off of stans, from the dots even down to the green tagged logo on the back.

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 06:03:23 2015 No.9707196 >>9707143 >how to spot a fuccboi jordan 1s are gross in all white

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 07:21:36 2015 No.9707379 >>9706443 just like about 90% of nike products idk how this is a problem

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 12:35:59 2015 No.9708196 File: 581 KB, 2580x1378, adderall-dubcomusic-com.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] effay drugs thread?

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 12:40:54 2015 No.9708217 File: 60 KB, 959x430, OD-BC884_SNEAKE_L_20140627144843.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9707183 lol but even the common projects which stan smiths are ripped from, have ripped of stan smiths, everyones ripping off everyone! lel

>>	Anonymous Wed Apr 15 12:45:56 2015 No.9708239 File: 60 KB, 640x426, common-project-achilles-stan-smith-3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>9708217