WATCHES: POST EM HERE YOU DUMB FUCKS

[Anonymous No.9601661]

Try not to shitpost about guns and muslims edition.

[Anonymous No.9601673]

1st for Europe is best.
Patek Philippe is the proof.

[Anonymous No.9601675]

>>9601661
Always loved seiko's quality, never liked their designs

[Anonymous No.9601676]

What was that sub-40$ casio quartz dress watch that used to be in the poorfag guide long ago?

[Anonymous No.9601681]

New to watches. What is the view of pic related?

[Anonymous No.9601685]

>>9601681
Orient is generally great for first watches at decent prices.
I'd go for it if you're new to watches.

[Anonymous No.9601687]

>>9601673
Okay, but their designs are still absolute and utter shit unless you're a 60 year old man.

They've managed to get through to you with their 'heritage quality' bullshit though, haven't they?

[Anonymous No.9601691]

>>9601681
Orient is a solid brand, that watch isn't perfect but it's really nice looking and a great value for the money. It's even on the official poorfag watch guide. If you like it, buy it.

[Anonymous No.9601692]

>>9601687

[Anonymous No.9601695]

Trying again in this thread then. Does anyone know of a cheaper watch with some type of variation of rose gold case/hands/marks and blue dial? Pic related was posted in the earlier thread, but it's not available anywhere.

[Anonymous No.9601701]

>>9601692
I think you responded to the wrong post, but holy shit is that a 007 mod? It looks amazing except for the strap.

[Anonymous No.9601714]

>>9601685
>>9601691
I've got pretty small wrists (like 6.5″). Is there a risk it'll look kinda gaudy? The thickness is another potential issue.

[Anonymous No.9601737]

>>9601714
Honestly, the vast majority of people in real life don't give a shit what watch you're wearing and won't notice, so I think you'll be fine. It'll probably be under a shirtsleeve most of the time anyway except for when you're looking at it.

It is a little big for a dress watch though, but if you want something smaller then you'll probably have to look into vintage stuff because the trend for several years now has been to make watches really big.

[Anonymous No.9601744]

>>9601661
Am I the only one that thinks divers with their huge ass bezels look really try hard and dumb? It's like, are you really going on an underwater expedition later today, you moron?

[Anonymous No.9601802]

>>9601744
Yeah, well, are you dressing nice for a date or something with your dress watch, f-fucking n-nerd?

I think they look nice, there's a huge variety of divers and they're a classic design. And it's nice having a tough watch that you can get wet and beat the shit out of and not have to worry about. Even if you're not diving, it's still good for swimming or fishing or other activities near water.

[Anonymous No.9601828]

>>9601744
I don't think they look try hard, but I do think they just look so... function over form.

[/g/ No.9602290]

to the anon who was asking for an expensive watch guide, i'm just going to reiterate that I won't make an expensive watch guide because there's no point, and because you shouldn't look at a poorly made infographic on 4chan to decide what you're going to spend thousands of dollars on. if you want an expensive watch, just ask. there's far too much to fit on there.

>>9601676
MTP1138Q
honestly it deserves a place in my guide, I may boot the bagelsport since all sellers of it appear to have vanished

>>9601681
bueno

[Anonymous No.9602321]

>>9601802
Actually the official guideline about how only 100 ATM and above can get wet are largely downplayed by manufacturers to safeguard themselves against unnecessary warranties of those faulty 1% that do get leaked.
Get your 5 ATM dress watch tested for water resistance at a watch shop, if it's truly 5 ATM then you can wear it showering and swimming.

Divers are popular just because of Bond and Rolex.

[Anonymous No.9602436]

>>9601692

what model is that? it's absolutely beautiful

[Anonymous No.9602456]

>>9602436
I'm pretty sure that's a heavily modified skx007, the case shape is pretty distinctive. It has a new bezel, bezel insert, dial, and hands though. And it looks like they brushed or sandblasted the case.

[Anonymous No.9602638]

>>9601701
>>9602436
>>9602456

Its a replica Tudor Pelagos. My buddy has a real one, its v nice.

[/g/ No.9602654]

>>9602638
>replica
>>>>>>replica

[Anonymous No.9602706]

>>9602638
No, a replica is when you buy a watch which is supposed to look exactly the same and says Tudor on it but isn't made by Tudor. That is a Seiko SKX007 modified with custom parts so that it looks a lot like a Pelagos, but nobody is going to ask you if that's a real Tudor because it clearly isn't and it doesn't claim to be.

[Anonymous No.9603362]

>>9601681
bought this one exactly like a month ago and everyone always thought that it costs like a midrange watch

[Anonymous No.9603373]

>>9601681
Why the fuck is the roman numeral for 4 in that pic is IIII???

It triggers my autism holy shit

[/g/ No.9603392]

>>9603373
Literally every single roman numeral watch is this way. IIII is just as valid as IV.

[Anonymous No.9603400]

>>9603392
>IIII is just as valid as IV.

But thats not how its thought in schools

[Anonymous No.9603403]

>>9603373
In actual ancient Roman texts they write IIII, that was the original correct way to write 4. Clocks and watches have had it written that way for centuries. IV didn't come into use until much later.

[/g/ No.9603429]

>>9603400
Public schooling gives you only a basic groundwork of knowledge, you need to do much more on your own if you expect to actually know anything, especially with history.

[Anonymous No.9603439]

>>9603429
>Public schooling
But I'm from a private. I guess your right, it just doesn't stop other people from noticing too.

[Anonymous No.9603446]

>>9603373

It is to counter balance the 7 for a semblance of symmetry.

Standard practise.

[Anonymous No.9603459]

>tfw watches have finally become useful

[Anonymous No.9603470]

>>9603403
It took me so goddamn long to find an example, I hope you guys appreciate this. This is entrance gate 54 to the Colosseum.

[Anonymous No.9603475]

>>9603470
son, what am I lookin at

[/g/ No.9603486]

>>9603475
>LIIII

>>9603439
I guess I should have said school in general. I didn't learn that at my private school either.

[Anonymous No.9603488]

>>9603475
54 written LIIII, not LIV.

[Anonymous No.9603496]

>>9603459
>apple watch
>useful

[Anonymous No.9603498]

What is the perfect watch to look like james bond?

[Anonymous No.9603503]

>>9603496
Reminder to ignore the shills

[/g/ No.9603510]

>>9603498
a rolex submariner would be the best choice seeing as it's appeared in 11 movies, but your other options include the seiko G757 and the omega seamaster planet ocean.
which bond do you want to look like?

[Anonymous No.9603519]

Wanna get a watch like the first two in the pic. Iffy about buying from eBay. Are there any watches in the similarity and price? Dont wanna spend too much but not too little. I love the way it looks.

[Anonymous No.9603527]

>>9603510
>>9603510
>which bond do you want to look like?
casino royale

[Anonymous No.9603532]

>>9603498
Fuck that, get a Seiko 6105 and look like Captain Willard instead. That's a cool ass watch, too.

[Anonymous No.9603534]

>>9603510
hey /g/ how do you analyze or look into a watch if you see it the first time? I mean if its shit or not

[Anonymous No.9603555]

>>9603534
See if the brand is one you've heard good things or bad things about. See what movement is in it. Check if the watch is made by the mountain jews, the nips, the sweatshop chinks, or the former communists. Check if they're lying about where it's actually made. Google it. Check watchuseek. Ask people who may own that watch or something like it from the same brand.

[/g/ No.9603556]

>>9603534
Brand brand brand. With clothes brandfags are usually retarded because most of it's still cheap chink garbage anyway but the brand of a watch tells you everything about its quality.
Well-known established swiss watchmaker? Probably a safe choice. No-name kickstarter brand? Make sure you research what movement is in the watch. You analyze the movement by also looking at the brand and then determining if that movement befits the price point the watch is being sold at. Most of the time, it doesn't, but you get exceptions like Obris Morgan who are selling watches far below the price they'd fetch from somebody else.

[Anonymous No.9603577]

Watcha fellas think?
You think any other colors to be better?
http://www.livmorris-shop.de/shop-liv-morris/modell-1963/?mobile=1

[/g/ No.9603582]

>>9603577
It's a rodina st17 with a slightly different dial for 60 dollars more. Just buy a rodina.

[Anonymous No.9603589]

>>9603582
Isnt the movement much different though?

[/g/ No.9603606]

>>9603589
It's an ST17 movement.

[Anonymous No.9603608]

>>9603589
The site says its a Seagull ST17. That's the exact same cheap Chinese movement as the Rodina. Its a 3 hand automatic movement with zero complications, it doesn't even have center seconds, there's really not a whole lot to it.

[Anonymous No.9603632]

opinions on MTM watches? overpriced?

[Anonymous No.9603642]

>>9603632
And shit

[/g/ No.9603646]

>>9603632
Biiiiig fucking watches and very very very overpriced. If you want a slightly tacticool tritium watch, get a luminox.

[Anonymous No.9603662]

>>9603632
Dumb tacticool bullshit. I checked one watch and apparently it has a decent miyota quartz chrono movement and an AR coated sapphire crystal so its not nearly as bad as it could be, but you could do a whole lot better and I would never pay that much for it even if I didn't hate the styling. I didn't check any of the black coated ones but I'm assuming they're PVD coated which is bad and will fall off. If you want black then look for DLC coating ($$$) or some type of black ceramic ($$$$).

[Anonymous No.9603684]

>>9603403
>In actual ancient Roman texts they write IIII, that was the original correct way to write 4

there is no correct way to write any number, romans didn't give a shit so long as it added up right.

[Anonymous No.9603729]

R8 my watch

[Anonymous No.9603932]

does anyone know a cheaper alternative to this rolly?

[Anonymous No.9603952]

Does anyone know anything about this omega model? Is it just a vintage fake?

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9603967]

>>9603952
looks old, but could be fake too

only way to tell on the older models (china fakes everything) is to crack open the caseback and check it out

[Anonymous No.9603975]

>>9603967
>looks old
ya think?

[JosefStalin No.9604010]

>>9603932
Invicta make a model for like $100. It accepts Rolex bezels as well so you can put a gmt bezel on it. But I think the gold is a bit gaudy, I'm not sure of invicta make an all gold one similar to that Rolex but you should avoid it

[Anonymous No.9604013]

>>9603459
you, however, continue to be useless, anon.

[Anonymous No.9604016]

>>9603932
What do you mean by cheaper alternative? Do you mean a watch with real gold or without?

If you wanted the real gold gmt then save up for it. It'll be worth it. If you meant a plated fake gold, then I'd suggest a replica but they are plated. They're not real gold.

[Anonymous No.9604046]

>>9603729
I like the dial, never seen a chrono as clean and uncluttered. know nothing about that brand.

what is the diameter, please?

[Anonymous No.9604050]

>>9603952
You're definitely going to need to see the inside and check the caseback for a model reference number and stuff like that. Once you know that you can look up the model online and see what it's supposed to look like. If the watch is solid gold then there should definitely be some hallmarks stamped on the inside of the caseback which tell you the purity of the gold and where it was made. If it's gold plated or capped then I don't think it necessarily has to have any of that stamped on it.

I don't know a whole lot about Seamasters, I didn't even know ones with moonphases and all that stuff existed, so here goes my uneducated opinion. The T-Swiss Made-T on the bottom means the watch should have tritium lume, seems odd since I don't see where the lume is on the dial. I suppose that black stuff on the hour and minute hands could be really really old crusty lume, but it looks more like the ebony inlays that Omega used a whole bunch on their hands. On a watch that old the tritium lume should be almost dead, but maybe you can very faintly see it in a totally dark room. If you can physically go look at the watch yourself maybe you should try that out.

It's also odd to me that the logo and the OMEGA text are painted on rather than applied. Almost every Omega I can think of has at least the logo applied. That's not a bad sign for sure and maybe that's how it's supposed to be, but it seems a bit suspicious.

[Anonymous No.9604093]

So no one tryna help me with these watches. Mainly interested in the top one. Any other alternatives to it? I like the styling.

[Anonymous No.9604119]

>>9601687
Getaloadofthisguy.dll
Sounds like someone's mad they can't afford one.

[Anonymous No.9604137]

>>9604119

[Anonymous No.9604148]

>>9604093
m8 if your getting a hard on because the whole SAS thing, this is incredibly similar to the real thing the SAS used back in the day, it's about 400 dollariedoos though, potentially out of your price range, I'm unfamiliar with the brand, post the specifications of the watch thst is listed in the description

[Anonymous No.9604155]

>>9604148
Nah its not the SAS thing giving me a hard on. Its the way it looks. Simple and not over the top but ye that one is out of my range.

[Anonymous No.9604162]

>>9604148
"This is a fresh new British SAS SBS Military (Satin case finished version) divers watch which made of solid class A stainless steel material.

Big and chunky stainless steel case with screw-down crown. The watch movement is a Swiss ETA quartz operated. 0-60 unidirectional ratchet bezel with luminous "pip" in the triangle and flat mineral crystal. Water resistant up to 20 bar/200 metres/660 feet. This watch is so solid, strong and extremely durable and legible. 42mm width (excluding crown), 13mm thickness, 20mm lugs. Much highly functional, indestructible built to last with strong case, crystal, the grey nylon band and movement which will endure the toughest of conditions. It has a cool black MOD dial with the luminova hands. Looks so cool!!!"
I dont know what to trust. It ships from Hong Kong so fuuuuuu.

[Anonymous No.9604172]

>>9604155
Well some people like the heritage thing more then the actual design, the watch doesn't look too bad, it's not very expensive, if the strap is shit you can get a new, better one for like $10

[Anonymous No.9604184]

>>9604172
That's true. Some people do prefer heritage over looks and function.

[Anonymous No.9604188]

>>9604162
Let someone else help you out on this m8

[Anonymous No.9604200]

>>9604188
I need halp m8. Guess ill just w8.

[Anonymous No.9604214]

>>9603459
Trypophobia watch

[Anonymous No.9604268]

>>9604010
thanks fam. i know its gaudy but thats kinda what im going for. im black so
>>9604016
alternative as in cheaper brand but similar colorway/aesthetic. there is no way ill ever be able to afford it legit. a replica is a good point though, even if it may be hard to find, thanks g.

[Anonymous No.9604376]

>>9601695
You want it in cheap? Well your only hope is some chinkshit Paris. Just google Paris dateless or similar. No rose gold that I know of though

[Anonymous No.9604397]

>>9603527
Omega Seamaster, faggot

If you don't have 4k lying around then get the poorfag Seagull ripoff

[Anonymous No.9604399]

>>9604046
about 44mm

[Anonymous No.9604639]

>>9604376
Cheap as in not $5000. I don't mind paying $500.

[Anonymous No.9604648]

I wear a Casio F-91W.
Love it, served me well.

But now I'm a Creative Director, working close to the client and somehow everything got pretty serious very quick and the pay is good on top of that. Saying the Casio doesn't really cut it anymore.

My background is in marketing, management and engineering; I'm not even a "real" creative. So I don't really want anything too colorful. A watch that says business and has a nice design. Preferably with a modern, unusual design, but nothing too fancy, nothing too distracting.

Budget is around 2000$.

Any ideas? I'm completely oblivious when it comes to watches.

[Anonymous No.9604649]

>>9601661
daily reminder that watches are like fedoras for the wrist

[Anonymous No.9604667]

>>9604649
Don't worry, you'll grow up someday as well.

[Anonymous No.9604698]

>>9604639
Well there's not much of a market for datejust homages let alone rose gold ones.

Best options are finding Parnis or Alpha homages possibly with gold tinted hands. Looking for stuff in the middling range will only lead to frustration, even microbrands powered by Miyota or quartz know to steer clear of homages to anything but the sub or flieger

[Anonymous No.9604701]

>>9604648
speedy motm

[Anonymous No.9604711]

>>9604639
Also understand Parnis is more of a generic label than actual brand. I believe contacting most reputable dealers for it like manbushijie or parniswatch could yield results. For rose gold plating and sapphire crystal I bet they'd whip one out with a Chinese or even authentic Miyota auto movement for 300

[JosefStalin No.9604763]

>>9604648
Omegma speed master bruh. A used one of is possible within that budget. Be careful at this price range, it is easy to pay way too much for a watch for no apparent reason. Here is the speed master.

[Anonymous No.9604782]

>>9604701
Thanks for your reply. typing this into google gives me a lot of sports shit, but I somehow ended up on the Omega website.

Speedmasters look too bland for my taste (although I admit that I didn't want something too fancy). I noticed the De Ville Central Tourbillon, but the pricetag is just below 100k $. What a shame.

MOTM....
tried Omega Speedmaster Professional MOTM. Pretty generic.

[Anonymous No.9604792]

>>9604763
Ah there we go.
It's a nice watch, but it's a very common watch. Don't know whether this would be worth it for me.

Maybe it might be necessary the raise the budget. It's doable, but I don't want to enter the Veblen Goods range of pricing.

[Anonymous No.9604816]

>>9604648
Stowa 1938

[Anonymous No.9604827]

The picture that made me fell in love with the Stowa Antea.

[JosefStalin No.9604834]

>>9604792
The niggers on Apollo wore it to the moon, it's common, and timeless, at the risk of copping shit maybe you should consider spending $500 on a watch and using the left over funds for clothes and shoes, this is a fashion board after all. But have a look at high end seikos, Probably not common In your country but still high quality.

[Anonymous No.9604946]

>>9603519
http://www.ebay.com/itm/321413424887?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

[Anonymous No.9604947]

>>9603729
sick love it! how much are these?

[/g/ No.9604961]

>>9603729
2big

[Anonymous No.9605241]

I don't wear a watch but I'd wear this.

[/g/ No.9605249]

>>9605241
If you were a rich fuck, you mean. That watch is worth six figures.

[Anonymous No.9605250]

>>9603952

Regardless of wether it's fake or not, I love that moonphaseface

[/g/ No.9605258]

>>9605250
It looks like a sad chinaman.

[Anonymous No.9605260]

>>9605249
Yeah, I will of course never own one. I havent worn watches for years and have not planned on starting - but a Milsub would change that if I was stinking rich. Still I probably wouldn't spend money on a regular Submariner with a nato strap. Go figure.

[/g/ No.9605264]

>>9605260
There may still be hope for you, if you'd settle for a lookalike.

[Anonymous No.9605268]

>>9601661
>that pic

Holy shit the lenghts you have to go to make SKX007 look good

[Anonymous No.9605275]

>>9605249
It's crazy what they go for, but i'd rather buy that for 150,000$ than some over engineered patek.

[Anonymous No.9605277]

>>9604711
not either anon, but I just did a bunch of research into this over the last couple weeks.

He's right, "Parnis" is a word that chink watch factories slap onto stuff they make in-house that they want to make a quick buck on. currently dominated by--but far from limited to--PAM/Marina Militare homages. however, some factories actually make acceptable-quality watches with SG or Miyota movements or good clone 6497 and 6498 movements. That the dial says "Parnis" tells you nothing. Watchuseek has a thread that identifies 5 online sellers that only deal in the quality Parnis manufacturers, including the two mentioned. just go to WUS and type "parnis" in the search, it says "read first."

Some sites have a standard upgrade charge for swanneck mvts (most folks say it's not worth it for these) or sapphire glass. There's usually a contact email for custom orders, too, which I think I'm going to look into that. I have a skellington wrist, so it's hard finding styling I want in a <44mm watch since larger is what's selling these days.

if you can find that magic combination of acceptable movement and the look/features you desire, then you can get an awesome deal--as low as $95 USD or like $130 with sapphire glass--but you sort thru a lot of rubbish.

if the first anon can pay $500, he can surely get a great watch, but as the other guy says, the popular homages are what sell, so that is a limiting factor.

just passing along what I learned.

[/g/ No.9605279]

>>9605275
I agree. Pateks are nice collection pieces but their movements are honestly fragile as fuck and can't take much more abuse than you'd encounter while working your cushy job as a corporate executive and maybe banging the occasional high-end prostitute.
Rolexes can take a beating.

[Anonymous No.9605283]

Anons , im just starting getting into fashion, and i'd like to get myself a nice watch, would replica be enough especially that im not really wealthy?

[/g/ No.9605296]

>>9605283
Just make sure you get a good one, and don't try to flaunt it like an obnoxious cunt.

[Anonymous No.9605311]

>>9605268
I guess that's a compliment. Here's some more photos.

[Anonymous No.9605314]

[Anonymous No.9605315]

[Anonymous No.9605317]

>>9605311
how was that a compliment

[Anonymous No.9605318]

>>9605314
What's this one? Is the photo b&w or just the watch?

[Anonymous No.9605331]

>>9605283
There's plenty of nice watches that aren't fakes in every price range. But if there's a particular model you like a whole lot a lot and really want a replica of then there's lots of good replicas for most of the common watches if you're willing to spend a reasonable amount. Just don't get a $20 quartz Trolex from some dude on the street and don't try to show off with your fake watch because it's embarrassing.

What watch do you have in mind?

[/g/ No.9605333]

>>9605318
SNK809
Photo is black and white, the seconds hand has a red tip.

[Anonymous No.9605336]

>>9605317
I know it wasn't
>>9605318
It's the same blue SNK807

[Anonymous No.9605345]

>>9605331
i just wanted a simple slick watch similiar to >>9601692

[/g/ No.9605351]

>>9605345
Why not that watch, then? Unless you're specifically after the pelagos look. That watch would be hard to recreate since you'd have to build it yourself and I don't know where you'd find that dial.
If you really want this exact look, a pelagos replica is a good choice. Also prevents you from flaunting it like a cunt because nobody's ever heard of tudor.

[Anonymous No.9605362]

>>9605345
Its a modified Seiko SKX007. No need to buy a fake, its only like $200. Like /g/ said though, that's a custom modified one that had a lot of work done to it. A real pelagos is great too but those are about $4500 now, it's a bit obscure though compared to the usual fake rolexes and omegas so it might be a bit harder to get a fake, I'm sure there's something though.

[Anonymous No.9605387]

>>9605351
gonna find something like this, looks really neat

[/g/ No.9605397]

>>9605362
Pelagos replica is actually one of the best replicas on the market. Same guys who made that black bay super rep.
Gotta remember that the good replica market caters to nerds like us while cheap shit caters to normalfags and blingy drug dealers.

>>9605387
http://www.pure-time.com/product/pelagos-zf-11-best-edition-on-titanium-bracelet-a2824-free-rubber-strap/

[Anonymous No.9605400]

What does /fa/ think about Orients cheaper 3 star watches? Are they pure shit? I can afford better but I've seen some that look quite nice.

[/g/ No.9605404]

>>9605400
Not pure shit. Get it. They're basically orient's seiko 5.

[Anonymous No.9605572]

>>9605397
Oh shit nigga I had no idea that existed. I might have finally found my first replica, that looks great. Do you have any idea if these replica makers can do a good job making titanium though? That's the one part that worries me a bit since working titanium is much harder than stainless and it's pretty uncommon too.

[/g/ No.9605636]

>>9605572
They did a good job supposedly. There's lots of reviews out on it, go read a few.

[Anonymous No.9605697]

Should I get a jacksonte 40mm homage (46mm lug-to-lug) or what I actually want, a PAM512 rep (50mm lug-to-lug) if my wrists are 47mm?

[Anonymous No.9605703]

>>9605697
Panerais are big on everyone, if that's the watch you want then you shouldn't worry about it being comically large.

[Anonymous No.9606266]

>>9605264
Thanks for the tip anon, but at that price it's not happening.

[Anonymous No.9606433]

Does anyone in here have experience with second hand prices on fashion brand watches? I have an Emporio Armani AR0428 (http://www.amazon.com/Emporio-Armani-AR0428-Black-Leather/dp/B003CJLRFS)) that I bought as my first watch four years ago. It's got some light scratching on it, you think I could get anything worth a damn for it today? I haven't used it in years so I'm thinking I might as well sell it and put the money towards buying a new better watch instead if I can get anything for it.

[Anonymous No.9606486]

Good watch for being in the desert for a week?

[Anonymous No.9606503]

is this /fa/?

[Anonymous No.9606505]

>>9606433
prepare for hate, friend :^)

[Anonymous No.9606508]

>>9605703
Worth mentioning that the one in the picture is 60mm Panerai Egiziano. 60 freakin mm.

[Anonymous No.9606513]

too gimmicky or nah? im in the market atm and im looking at this vs black faced version with metal bracelet or a plainer version of the black faced metal bracelet Tissot. Probably the chronograph or Gent

[Anonymous No.9606515]

>>9606486
A diver in case it rains.

What's so special about a desert? I would think pretty much anything should be fine, if its so hot a watch can't take it then its probably hot enough to harm you too.

[Anonymous No.9606521]

>>9606508
its like wearing a shirt that reads 'I HAVE A MICROPENIS'

[Anonymous No.9606526]

Just purchased for $95 / £65 for my fellow brits. love the look of this one.

[Anonymous No.9606528]

>>9606526
NOT EVEN SOLID GOLD BRAP

[Anonymous No.9606530]

>>9606505
Why? I'm getting rid of it, not buying one. I know fashion brands are shitty watches, I just happened to buy one four years ago before I knew that.

[Anonymous No.9606533]

>>9606505
no he won't he didn't ask to buy one but rather to sell it and then to buy something better.

[Anonymous No.9606534]

>>9606513
this is perfect except for the fucking mushroom-ass buttons on the right

[Anonymous No.9606535]

>>9606526
/fa/ watchfags really hate mvmt

[Anonymous No.9606539]

>>9606433
ya fookin wat mate ill smack ya inda gob ya cheeky fashon chinafag shitbag fuckpigass cuck boy

[Anonymous No.9606540]

>>9606535
haha really? I had no idea, could you tell me why?

[Anonymous No.9606541]

>>9606535
It's just a product of marketing there's no real value behind it, same as with designer watches

[Anonymous No.9606555]

>>9606526
advertchimp loves his adverts ooh ooh aah aah

[Anonymous No.9606556]

love my audemaur but in all honesty obama better not try take my colt, my most /fa daily accessory, and a new McCarthy to deal with domestic Islamic influence is needed (vote Cruz) or well all be wearing saddles and rags on our hair

[Anonymous No.9606643]

Jihad dalin alli ilyala mu'halla allam bulhim

[Anonymous No.9606662]

>>9606556
>>9606643
You forgot the
> :^)

[Anonymous No.9606684]

>>9606513
I have it and I really like it.
If you want perpetual calendar in a watch, you should go for that one, unless you're a millionaire.

[/g/ No.9606709]

>>9606486
A diver, with a sapphire crystal.
I'd normally recommend a g-shock but the sand would scratch the acrylic up.
If you gave a price range I could be more specific.

>>9606433
You might be able to get $60 for it.

[/g/ No.9606771]

>>9606503
skagen is not good
black coatings are not good
avoid avoid avoid avoid

>>9606513
I loved my perpetual calendar. You should get it.

>>9606534
If you like that color, they make the perpetual calendar in it too.

>>9606540
they're really big and black coatings are dildos
beyond that, anything that's not from a real watch brand gets at least a little hate here.

>>9606556
>/fa
Why have I increasingly been seeing this? What happened to the other slash? Are you some kind of reddit nigger?

[Anonymous No.9606781]

>>9606513
clown face, cannot unsee

[Anonymous No.9606782]

>>9606771
Ugh.. Clown face really looks better in white.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9606806]

>>9606709
too bad your "field" watch you parade around as your grail has a plastic face prone to scratching

>seiko used it because it's less prone to shattering

seiko used it because it saved them $5/watch

your a poser with walmart watch

[/g/ No.9606821]

>>9606782
Yeah, anthracite is easily the worst of the three colors.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9606852]

>>9606821
this is the advice you're taking

the best watch on the market according to /g/ :

>base metal polished case cast in china

> small diameter to save money

>malaysian, korean or chinese movement

>plastic spacer to fit third party case

>arcrylic case back, with a thread ring to market as exhibition

>plastic day-date wheel, low end hands and poorly painted face

>arcrylic crystal (as in the piece) aka arcrylic face of the watch for those who don't know

>plastic stem with a base metal applique

>nylon NATO strap style/NATO inspired (missing 2 pieces of nylon and 3 pieces of hardware) polyester (not nylon) woven strap

$45.99 on sale with a "$64.99 MSRP"

nobody sells that watch at msrp

[Anonymous No.9607027]

>>9606852
are you wilfully this ignorant or just plain dumb?

Nobody respects you, sieg. Turn the trip off and stop posting

[Anonymous No.9607066]

I just received this Seiko 5 for repairing another watch that I plan on cleaning up.

I love the Roman numeral date.

Honestly, I can't tell if it's fake, really old, was put back together haphazardly (the "Japan Made" being obscured by the case) or some odd combination of the three but I think it has potential.

The band is this awful leather with neon-green stitching, any suggestions on what I should get?

[Anonymous No.9607083]

>>9607066
Roman numeral date? That's supposed to be the day, are you sure it's not kanji or something? That dial color looks neat, keep it. No idea what strap color would match that though, probably something a bit subdued.

[Anonymous No.9607097]

>>9605249
Why does that Submariner cost 6 figures? Most cost in the $8000 range.
Vintage?

[Anonymous No.9607100]

muh omega

[Anonymous No.9607103]

>>9607083

I'm thinking a brown / khaki NATO with polished hardware might be nice, something on the darker end of the spectrum.

It's really weird, the inner dial has numbers from I to VII so I assume it correlates to the day of the week.

No idea how they managed that, I'll have to run the serial number and see how old it is but I have a strong suspicion that this was a Frankenwatch.

[/g/ No.9607106]

>>9607066
I think you're right to suspect it's fake, there's no way that dial is original. Not that it matters, it's just a dial and the watch is cheap anyway.

>>9607097
Iconic model that didn't get produced for very long. Yes, vintage.

[Anonymous No.9607112]

>>9607097
It's called a Milsub, they were made for the British military around the 50s/60s. They're super rare and sought after, they easily go for 6 figures all the time.

[Anonymous No.9607157]

>>9607106

The caseback has "7019-6081 A1", from the pictures I've seen it's older than I thought.

There's a white face one that just has " automatic" with the red "5" so maybe this was just assembled from vintage parts...maybe.

Gonna crack her open and take a look at the movement, the rotor turns over nicely but I want to see what kind of shape it's in, might post pictures later.

I think it's got a lotta potential.

[Anonymous No.9607371]

>>9605311
Would this be a bad first watch? I never really liked the look of these sorts of watches but it's starting to grow on me. Plus they look really good for the price. Would I be making a mistake?

[Anonymous No.9607452]

>>9607371
They're an excellent value for the price and they totally blow any other sub-$100 watch out of the water. Its a cheap watch and its clearly not as nice as more expensive watches are, which is something that most people understand and accept but which massively triggers sieg for some reason. But it's still a nice looking and simple watch, I don't think you can really go wrong with it.

[Anonymous No.9607789]

what do when the watch is too loose one the second to last hole but too tight on the last one?

should i change the strap?
i have a SNK809 with the nato strap and i guess all the nato strap sizes are about the same

[Anonymous No.9607813]

>>9607789
Move the watch up or down a little bit on the strap itself to adjust the fit slightly.

[Anonymous No.9608030]

>>9607789
The strap on those isn't really a nato strap, natos are constructed differently out of a single long piece of fabric and they usually have a lot of holes spaced very closely, so that might actually work. If it really bothers you that much then just change it I guess, the strap that comes on the SNKs is pretty cheap and itchy anyway.

[Anonymous No.9608205]

>>9607103

Na, you'll find some 7s26 movements with that day dial. Usually it's english/spanish, english/arabic, or english/roman numeral for the day.

[JosefStalin No.9608450]

How do you /fa/ggots with lower end watches store them when not in use? I've been thinking about getting a watch box, how much should I pay for one, I have a feeling the cheap ones on eBay are shitty.

[Anonymous No.9608489]

Was sent over here from a cop or not thread, opinions on Void?
This'd be my first watch. $215

Also if anyone had the guide mentioned in >>9601691 I'd appreciate it.

[Anonymous No.9608507]

>>9608489

I feel the case is too thick / chunky for such a minimalist face design

[JosefStalin No.9608515]

>>9608489
Made in China, Japan movement, bro it's probably a pretty shitty watch with a Quartz movement, better could be purchased with that $220 for sure, I don't think it is more that much, here is the guide.

[Anonymous No.9608695]

>>9606806
you're*

[Anonymous No.9608942]

Sadly can't afford a 10k rolex with my dads money.

[Anonymous No.9609117]

Thinking about coping this, thoughts?

[Anonymous No.9609212]

>>9607100
it pains me how short those hands are

[Anonymous No.9609217]

>>9609117
It's a nice watch.

[Anonymous No.9609233]

>>9601661

[Anonymous No.9609237]

...must...cop

[Anonymous No.9609239]

>>9609237

[Anonymous No.9609242]

>>9609239

[Anonymous No.9609245]

>>9609242
I will save this shitty thread with my unhealthy amount of watch porn

[Anonymous No.9609247]

>>9609245

[Anonymous No.9609251]

>>9609247

[Anonymous No.9609256]

[Anonymous No.9609290]

>>9609251

[/g/ No.9609407]

>>9609245
i gotchu nigga

[/g/ No.9609409]

[/g/ No.9609415]

[/g/ No.9609418]

[Anonymous No.9609455]

>>9609407
Is that a brushed steel dial?

[/g/ No.9609460]

>>9609455
It's still just enameled brass like every other dial but they have some sort of process that puts lots of lines through the enamel. It's referred to as a linen dial.

[/g/ No.9609490]

They also make dials out of lapis lazuli.

[/g/ No.9609494]

>rolexrolexrolex intensifies
and I thought the rehaut engravings were too much

[/g/ No.9609500]

Rolex has done some crazy dial shit in the past, I don't know why they don't anymore.

[/g/ No.9609516]

[Anonymous No.9609546]

Poorfag here is this shit total crap or not?

[Anonymous No.9609555]

>>9609546
if its under $20,000 USD its pure junk in the eyes of /fa/

[Anonymous No.9609582]

>>9609546
its a fashion watch, nothing wrong with it, not worth the price from a technical perspective but not a bad purchase if you like the design

[Anonymous No.9609603]

>>9605283
you can get an extremley accurate replica for around 400$ from pure time
cheap replicas are better left alone

[/g/ No.9609605]

>>9609555
not really, the only thing that makes a watch junk is when it's a ten dollar watch being sold for two hundred
which is exactly what daniel wellington is

>>9609546
it's total crap.

[Anonymous No.9609622]

>>9609605
not gonna deny this, but with watches like this you are paying for the design and nothing else, if you think its worth it, then just buy it

[Anonymous No.9609646]

>>9604827
man I love this watch.

I could only afford the cheap seagull version.

[Anonymous No.9609658]

>>9608489
I got one of these as a gift,
Mine is the black on gold on black,
I like it, im not sure of how high quality it is (very similar, almost identical case to the seagull one i have) but it keeps time well enough and isnt loud and looks quite nice.

[Anonymous No.9609778]

I'm currently shopping for baby's first watch. I like military style, smaller watches. Looking to spend as little as possible as I don't know if I'm gonna love wearing one every day. I've loved watches for a while now so basically what I'm saying is I want a starter watch to get me into collecting possibly.

Currently thinking of a seiko snk809, shits only like 60 bucks. I love the face a lot, but the case itsself is a little bland.

I really like leather goods so I want a nice strap to go with it. This worn and wound one looks really nice, but only fits 18mm while the seiko is 16.8. It's 60$ though so I'm thinking maybe I should invest in a watch that doesn't cost as much as a strap.

What is watch in pic related? Probably out of the range I want to spend, but anyone have suggestions on similar styles of watches, or similar straps that will fit the seiko?

[Anonymous No.9609795]

>>9609546

[Anonymous No.9609845]

>>9609778
This is the seiko I was thinking of getting. It apparantly retails for 185 and is on sale for 55 at jona shop. I know nothing of seiko 5s besides that there are a lot of them. Maybe this one has better mechanism due to its higher retail price?

Thinking of just getting it and tracking down a similar leather band that will fit it...

I wear pretty minimalist normal fits, raws and a t with leather shoes/boots so I'm guessing this kind of style will be alright. Probably pretty apparant I know nothing of watches besides that expensive ones are really pretty.

[Anonymous No.9609857]

>>9609778
the snk809 has 18mm lugs.

[Anonymous No.9609870]

>>9606771
it goes from epic to clownface every other minute for me- not sure if worth

[Anonymous No.9609903]

>>9609857
OK Thanks I'll probably end up getting that. Shit I really like the watch in that pic tho... I'll do some research and sit on some prices for a few days before I pull the trigger.

[Anonymous No.9609958]

terrorist watch is so yesterday. I'm thinking about this one instead. Opinions?

[Anonymous No.9609975]

cop or not?

[Anonymous No.9610099]

Whay does /fa/ think? I didn't really like it at first but it's grown on me. I mainly only have dressier watches so thinking about copping for some more casual variation.

[/g/ No.9610105]

>>9610099
Is that an internal rotating bezel?
Would buy.

[Anonymous No.9610133]

>>9610105
Apparently it is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4H1XS2bjP4&t=1m24s

I didn't even know lol. How come some model numbers only show up on moonspeak sites? Different model numbers for different parts of the world or are they only sold in certain parts of the world?

[/g/ No.9610149]

>>9610133
Lots of japanese watches are only sold in japan. They like to keep certain things for themselves, like basically all of seiko's good watches.

[Anonymous No.9610155]

>>9610149
Okay that sounds logical since they're japanese brands, but how about model numbers that only show up on Russian sites? Technically not moonspeak I guess, bt I've still tried to google a few model numbers that only showed a bunch of Russian watch dealers.

[/g/ No.9610160]

>>9610155
Shit negro, I have no idea. Do you have a link?

[Anonymous No.9610170]

>>9610160
Take the one in that youtube video for example:

https://www.google.com/search?q=BEMAL001D9

I don't know about you, but I only get Russian and Ukrainian hits.

[/g/ No.9610177]

>>9610170
That's really strange, actually. It is possible that orient may have some kind of regional catalog difference.

[Anonymous No.9610190]

>>9610177
Yeah that's what I was thinking as well, but at least the ebay dealer I'm looking it has decent reviews so I guess there's nothing fishy about the watches.

[Anonymous No.9610220]

Ive seen one irl, and it was much less inspiring

[Anonymous No.9610431]

also post sick Seiko 5 refs for we poorfags.
This is SNXJ92

[Anonymous No.9610464]

China strong

[Anonymous No.9610553]

Does anyone know of a good looking metal bracelet with a wet suit extension? It's going on pic related. 22mm lug

[Anonymous No.9610612]

>>9606503
Sadly no

[/g/ No.9610796]

>>9610553
Haven't we already been over this? Super oyster.

[Anonymous No.9610846]

>>9610796
not with me. Maybe I'm a retard (certainly not denying that) or finding the wrong one but I don't see the extension on the one's Im finding.

Im thinking something like this. I would just like to find one that looks nice.

[Anonymous No.9610850]

>>9610846
Maybe that's just something that Ill have to buy the clasp/extension separate and put it on a nicer bracelet,

[/g/ No.9610886]

>>9610846
http://amzn.com/B00NV4DLBM

[Anonymous No.9611418]

>>9610220
don't buy that shit. it's such a gimmick and then you toss it into the drawer because it was fun for like 5 seconds maybe. buy a functional and easy readable watch.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9611436]

>>9610846
you're taking advice from soneone who just learned what a wetsuit extension was from your post

he just doesn't want to admit it

[Anonymous No.9611490]

>>9610464
I want one badly but can't deal with how hard it is to service because of the movement so I never pulled the trigger.

[Anonymous No.9611504]

>>9609117

i just read about the company on their website

>launched in 2014
>Australian
>want to produce "luxury mechanical watches, without the luxury price tag"
>the have 1 model with 3 different coloured faces
> $300-$400

it does look pretty nice tho

[Anonymous No.9611548]

>>9611490
Every chronograph is a bitch to service, though. I ended up picking it over something like a Seiko 6139 or 6138 watches because I was worried about buying vintage. But you're right, this watch is cheap enough that you probably wouldn't even want to pay for servicing on it even if you could find someone willing to work on an obscure Chinese movement.

[Anonymous No.9611566]

>>9611548
>But you're right, this watch is cheap enough that you probably wouldn't even want to pay for servicing on it even if you could find someone willing to work on an obscure Chinese movement.

Yeah exactly what scared me. Doesn't help that the watch isn't exactly known for being problem free for very long periods of time either.

[Anonymous No.9611637]

>>9611504
Yeah they're some kickstarter bullshit company, but I think they're supposedly ok. I think that watch has a miyota 9015 in it which is really solid and $300-400 is a decent price for something with that movement. Assuming they can do a good job making that dial without fucking it up or having horrible QC or something then how bad can it be, I guess.

[Anonymous No.9611663]

>>9611637

aye just red this interview with the founder of the company

http://www.watchpaper.com/2015/03/04/qa-with-wes-knight-cofounder-of-erroyl/

he sounds like he knows what he's doing and i like the fact that he is inspired by pretty solid brands that i myself like very very much

seriously considering getting this one, pic related

just read the specs and it seems pretty solid

[Anonymous No.9612184]

>>9611436
Nobody's responding to you because they all have you filtered.
And now I do too.

[Anonymous No.9612906]

Can anyone help 📤 picking out a watch:
> mechanical, preferably automatic
> day at 12, date at 3 (really like how like hamiltons have it layed out)
> diver prefferably, but can be 10 atm
> in the $200 - $500 range
Ty in advance, gonna cross post it to /gw/

[Anonymous No.9612985]

>>9610464
>Si Juan

[Anonymous No.9613117]

>>mfw no GF

[Anonymous No.9613167]

>>9601675

[Anonymous No.9613229]

What does water resistance 30m means? Is it safe to wear it on shower?

[Anonymous No.9613249]

>>9613229
>Water Resistant 3 ATM or 30 m Suitable for everyday use. Splash/rain resistant. NOT suitable for showering, bathing, swimming, snorkelling, water related work and fishing.
I think 50m or more is safe for submersion, but you might as well just get a real 200m+ diver which will take pretty much anything with no problem.

Why the hell do you shower with your watch?

[Anonymous No.9613257]

>>9613249
i dont like to take off me watch

[JosefStalin No.9613273]

>>9613229
im not sure of the truth if this, but some people have said that wearing any watch in the shower should be a no go due to the heat, steam and chemicals. Any way 3 atm is a no go with water, at least anything above rain. 200m is fine for any water sports or any realistic circumstance, 300m is bretty good, can be used while diving. I don't know the conversion for metered to atmospheres.

[Anonymous No.9613368]

>>9609958
It's okay, but I think Casio has better options for ana-digi than that one. But, to be fair, I'm biased against the resin bands, I always go metal when I have the option.

[Anonymous No.9613407]

>>9613368

I've seen the other options. they are great, come with solar and what not. But way more expensive. The only thing that bugs me is that this one doesn't have any lights. But it's still more functional than most analog watches and it has luminous hands at least.

here's the blue version. But I thought I'd go for
the golden one because I like the sticks better than huge ass numerals.

[Anonymous No.9613522]

>>9611663

Yeah I'm loving the look - I'd like the rose gold one but its out of stock till June ;|

[Anonymous No.9613560]

I'm thinking of trying to produce my own watch, buy I don't know if I should get the Miyota 9015 movement or the ETA 2824-2.
I'm leaning mostly toward the ETA, but it's also a bit more expensive if I recall correctly.

[Anonymous No.9613566]

>>9613560
try EAT because you're fat lol

[Anonymous No.9613589]

>>9613566
Sieg, you forgot your name.

[Anonymous No.9613609]

I bought a fossil riley today. I am not sure if I can make the blue dial fit with too many outfits... I am also a bit worried if it will be to chunky on the wrist.
But it was a nice deal and I am looking forward to it.

[mandus No.9613645]

>>9608450
im gonna cop a cheap one off amazon

[/g/ No.9613760]

>>9613273
This is correct. Soap is not good for the seals on your watch. Divers can usually handle soap because the seals aren't exactly exposed anyways. Heat is also not good, but it's going to affect watches without screwdown crowns a lot worse than ones with them.
General rule is regardless of actual WR rating, you probably shouldn't take anything in the shower that doesn't have a screwdown crown.
Definitely not for swimming.

[/g/ No.9613766]

>>9613560
ETA will be easier to find cases for, but if you're talking about actual large-scale production, the miyota is a better choice. ETA is scaling down the amount of movements they sell to third parties and increasing the price for the few they do sell, so an ETA movement watch is not a sustainable choice for the future.

[Anonymous No.9613774]

>>9613609
Absolutely disgusting.

Why do girls have such horrible taste?

[Anonymous No.9613903]

>>9613774
Tastes are different, thank you very much.

[Anonymous No.9613981]

Who /RoyalOak/ here?

[Anonymous No.9614140]

>>9613981
Wow that's ugly even for a royal oak. What do people see in these things?

[Anonymous No.9614172]

>>9614140
the name and the price

[/g/ No.9614250]

>>9613981
Arnold pls go

[Anonymous No.9614264]

>>9614250
that is the exact one I am planning on getting for high school graduation, 36mm

[Anonymous No.9614269]

>>9614172
yup, same with the You-blow Big Bangs

[Anonymous No.9614284]

the fact that every shit tier watchmaker has a rolex submariner clone is absolutely repulsive

how is this even allowed?

[/g/ No.9614292]

>>9614284
Why would it not be allowed?
It's not just shit-tier watchmakers, the good ones do it too.
Rolex itself copied blancpain to make the submariner.

[Anonymous No.9615244]

d...did I do good /fa/?

[Anonymous No.9615254]

>>9615244
yes.

[Anonymous No.9615332]

I can't post the image but i bought this, how bad did i fuck up?

http://www.welcomeathome.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Crossover-Watch-by-Projects-Watches-unique-watches-desing.jpg

i dont like all these busy watches with so many details on them so i wanted something minimal and a bit different.

[Anonymous No.9615342]

>>9614140
>>9614172
>>9614250
Lol you poors cant afford it.

[Anonymous No.9615384]

>>9615332
pretty badly. but if you like it, just wear it. I'd just never buy that shit in my wildest ass dreams because I want a reliable watch.

[Anonymous No.9615582]

This is the first watch I have ever bought.

It looks very similar to a Rolex i desire very badly.

I will pickup an "expensive" brand name next year.

Can anyone recommend me a watch with a blue face but a little more basic?

[Anonymous No.9615621]

>>9615582
God damn you couldn't have at least gone for the black version, could you? I would at the very least remove that shit date magnifier that doesn't magnify. If you could also file off the logo on the side of the watch and replace the dial and hands with better ones that aren't plastered with the logo of the shittiest watch brand in existence then you would have a pretty decent watch.

What do you mean by more basic, smaller/not a diver? How about an SNK807 (>>9605311 >>9605314 >>9605315 )? They're cheap and great. I also have a blue OM Explorer II, but that's another diver and you probably don't want two of the same style of watch as your only two watches. Nothing else really comes to mind right now.

[Anonymous No.9615625]

>>9604010
>Invicta
for the love of god no. Buy a replica instead, less people will know you're embarrassing yourself.

[Anonymous No.9615635]

>>9615621
chill, it was the first watch i ever bought.
the magnifier does in fact work, very well.

I like blue faced watches, they look very nice, especially with the way i dress.

[Anonymous No.9615642]

>>9615621
also when i mean basic i mean sort of like movado, similar to this, but this one specifically feels girly and a bit ugly.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9615648]

>>9615582
lol

[Anonymous No.9615653]

>>9615648
:'c

[Anonymous No.9615661]

>>9601692
how do i buy one of these?

[Anonymous No.9615672]

>>9615642
> movado

Dude. Just no. Just. No.

[Anonymous No.9615714]

>>9615642
MOVADO ARE FUCKING DOGSHIT GET A PROPER WATCH LIKE A MAAAAAAAN ON THE MOOOON FUCKER

[Anonymous No.9615719]

>>9615661
Throw money at them until they consider it's enough and give you a watch in return. Quite an easy concept, actually.

[Anonymous No.9615726]

>>9615719
the watch is heavily modified....

[Anonymous No.9615731]

>>9615714
Those fucking anthenas dude, can't deal with that shit.

>All I hear he talks is tzzzt, tzzzt, tzzzt, tzzzt.

[Anonymous No.9615741]

since gold is "gaudy" does that mean people can only wear silver watches now? because that's pretty boring.

[Anonymous No.9615752]

>>9615726
You're simply throwing money at the wrong people. Find the person responsible for the modifications and fuck his face with dollar bills until you get similar results.

[Anonymous No.9615766]

>>9615741
There's precious metals that work, titanium, DLC and other coatings, forged carbon, ceramic and so on.

Gold works for dress watches or possibly sport watches that aren't huge and worn by a darker complexed person.

[Anonymous No.9615781]

>>9615741
Just don't get a huge flashy blinged out nigwatch, don't be super pale, don't buy anything gold-colored unless it's actually made out of gold, avoid super thin gold plating because it wears off, and stop giving a shit what other people think about your dope gold watch.

Having a skintone that looks good with gold is like the one advantage of being nonwhite.

[Anonymous No.9615785]

>>9615653
Take no stock in what he says, he's the village retard.
Your watch is p. good but it carries the invicta badge of eternal shame.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9615809]

>>9615785
yeah lol his watch is fucking nice.....hahaha

im just stupid invicta watches are god tier

hahaha

[/g/ No.9615831]

>>9615809
Most of them suck cocks but the 8926 and variants are a nice step up from a seiko 5 for the absolute poorest of poorfags
Anybody who isn't on welfare/is willing to spend a bit to get something actually good instead of sort of good should get something swiss though.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9615929]

>>9615831
u R SEW STUPID SIEG INVICTA IS SWISS SEEEEEEEEEE

who was that
who was that 2 months ago?

oh yeah you

[/g/ No.9615941]

>>9615929
but invicta isn't swiss

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9615966]

>>9615941
took you 2 months to finally agree

nxtlvl poorfag

[/g/ No.9615974]

>>9615966
but I've never said that invicta is swiss

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9616028]

>>9615974
>>9615974
yes you did nigga

and you called me an idiot for claiming they werent and posted pics of their marketing

i then responded with pics of the china movements and the citizen/miyota equipped watches

which you shut the fuck up and disappeared for a week

now you're back here arguing because you learned something

you're transparent

you're useless

and you have a small collection of seiko 5's

i forgot more about watches back in 2009 when /fa/ was talking about shit like the swatch irony skeleton watches than you have learned in the last 2 months you were obsessed about them

you'll move onto somethin else

probably rick owens used clothes and post in a goff ninja thread once you graduate community college and get a part time job so you can afford$60 shirts

[/g/ No.9616072]

>>9616028
things that never happened: the post
I have never believed that invicta was swiss and thus would never have posted about it
I understand that you're suffering from some sort of mental illness but try to be a little less retarded

[Anonymous No.9616218]

>>9615766
>titanium
It looks like silver.

[Anonymous No.9616222]

>>9616218
It's usually notably darker.
You can always buy a plastic swatch you know.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9616226]

>>9616072
i don't know why i bother to correct your misnomers/false assumptions and dumbass-ery really

you just pretend that when you get schooled it never happened

you know for a fact that you don't know what you're talking about and just obsess about the easiest fucking thing ever

just parrot advice from PMWF/Reddit/loe-income watches section of watchuseek

i mean how fun is it to post pics of your $44.99 watch on a fake zulu strap

while telling people to buy budget seiko5 field watches and looking at patek phillipe watches all day?

/fa/ used to just obsess over rolex/omega until i posted about 2 watches i liked the patek phillipe 2 min repeater and the credor min repeater

people like you also used to meme seiko sucked until i showed them grand seiko's

[Anonymous No.9616227]

>>9615781
>Having a skintone that looks good with gold is like the one advantage of being nonwhite.
Or protection from the sun, which is the purpose of melanin.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.9616236]

>>9616218
titanium isn't a precious metal either

citizen used to have a bunch of titanium watches

i used to have a tiatnium case + gold plated diver from them

[Anonymous No.9616259]

>>9616222
I have a casio f-91w but I wanted something fancier than plastic. Guess I'll just stick with this then.

[Anonymous No.9616273]

>>9616236
Nice blog post, faggot.

[/g/ No.9616298]

migrate all shitposting to new thread pls
>>9616296
>>9616296
>>9616296

[Anonymous No.9616416]

>>9613249
>>9613229

I can't speak for all makes, but my Weekender is rated 30m and it gets submerged frequently most days.

the kitchen I work in has no dish machine so I use the 3 sink method, the upshot is it gets dunked all day long. not for more than proly 30 secs at a time, though, and maybe a foot or two depth max. but frequently. absolutely no harm done.

my $0.02

[Anonymous No.9617344]

>>9604649
hahahahaha what the fuck r u dumb?

[Anonymous No.9617614]

>>9615642
get this bruh
seiko sup875