[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 96 KB, 700x700, bomba.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9477677 No.9477677 [Reply] [Original]

>ctrl+f no bomber thread?
let's fix that.

Is this worth the money?
http://shop.carhartt-wip.com/de/men/jackets/I018912/adams-jacket

>> No.9477688
File: 96 KB, 500x750, navy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9477688

>>9477677
w2c this navy blue one?

>> No.9477706

>>9477688
second this

>> No.9477719

>>9477688
>>9477706
NO ONE KNOWS

>> No.9477736
File: 261 KB, 1200x1180, JUDDNnM1nXA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9477736

>>9477677
opinions on this

>> No.9477739

>>9477736
Good luck on that

>> No.9477754

>>9477688
Heard it's volcom. This picture is ancient though so I doubt you can get one.

>> No.9477778
File: 90 KB, 500x599, baggybomber.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9477778

>> No.9477783
File: 84 KB, 1000x1000, Our Legacy Bomber II.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9477783

Is this one any good?

>> No.9477784
File: 11 KB, 225x300, mystery RO ma1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9477784

>>9477778
requesting bomber fits that aren't just a skinny guy wearing slim jeans wearing a bomber

>> No.9477795
File: 18 KB, 361x500, exploderbomber.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9477795

>> No.9478053

>>9477736
gonna be overpriced for what it is
but it's p nice

>> No.9478094
File: 1.18 MB, 1615x3033, 1402457148588.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9478094

w2c similar lightweight bomber?

>> No.9478152

>>9478094
You can find one on everlane

>> No.9478472
File: 403 KB, 1000x1000, MA1_Sage_front01_v3.USE-THIS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9478472

worth copping?

>> No.9478519
File: 1.50 MB, 3008x2000, DSC_0317.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9478519

>> No.9478520

>>9477736
garbage
>>9477783
mehhh
>>9477784
v nice
>>9478472
if u wanna look like a fatass fat ass

>> No.9478557

>>9478472
Fits puffy af i took mine back because even sizing down didnt help

>> No.9478558
File: 136 KB, 730x1095, 32903650_041_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9478558

Thoughts on this?

>> No.9478564

>>9477736
Very nice. Expensive because its ripstop cotton. Im getting the camo one for raf vibes.

>> No.9478569

>>9478520
You have horrible taste. The actually nice looking supreme one is garbage, but that ugly ass our legacy one is just ehh?

>> No.9478660

>>9478569
the orange lining is unappealing and not worth the price. and u obviously don't know what mehhh means u fuccboi. only nice one itt was the ro one

>> No.9478679
File: 56 KB, 640x480, image2.5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9478679

>>9478520
Is it opposite day

>> No.9478697

>>9478660
>only nice one itt was the ro one

Yup I was right, no taste

>> No.9478719

What brands make good olive bombers?

>> No.9479212

>>9478719
Our Legacy has a nice and a sturdy one.

>> No.9479215
File: 100 KB, 1280x853, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9479215

Cop or not?

>> No.9479293

>>9479215
No

>> No.9479335

>>9479215
No

>> No.9479346
File: 222 KB, 1000x1333, DU15S9760NA09_M_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9479346

Where could I find one like this but less shiny and more puffy?

>> No.9479356
File: 9 KB, 228x221, släng.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9479356

Recent cop from Tiger of Sweden (on the right). It's a bit darker in person, like a metallic-shiny black.

>> No.9479358
File: 181 KB, 700x680, släng.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9479358

>>9479356
I'm so ashamed, here's the pic.

>> No.9479361

any opinions on harringtons? Which ones are better fitted and more worth the money - MERC or Ben Sherman's?

>> No.9479417

>>9477736
anyone got a price estimate on this?? I'm uk, so everything's like twice as fucking expensive

>> No.9479418

>>9477736
gonna be atleast 288
gonna try and get the back with camo

>> No.9479426

>>9479346
Alpha industries slim model.

>> No.9479437
File: 24 KB, 450x450, 1423368770477.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9479437

where can I cop a bomber in this colourway that isn't from ASOS?

>> No.9479441

>mfw i spammed volcom eveyrtime someone reposted that stupid ass picture almost a year ago and its still being perpetuated to this day

>> No.9479443

>>9477688
meant to quote
>>9479441

>> No.9479473

>>9479417
£60 on eBay

>> No.9479504
File: 827 KB, 1404x1006, dope af.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9479504

>>9478472
ew

>>9479215
wut

>>9479358
i actually like it.

>>9479437
was going to say our legacy.

you're better of with a fine black or navy blue one. even a brownish will look better.

>> No.9479507

>>9479504
>Original Bomber desing
>ew

>> No.9479513

>>9477688
Boot ID me pls, they're perfect

>> No.9479516

>>9479513
they're just some common chelsea boots, right? correct me if I'm wrong.

>> No.9479523
File: 193 KB, 800x1066, original.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9479523

>>9479507
i don't like the original bomber designs that much tbh. The posted one is more acceptable than pic related but imo you can do way better

They were effay somewhile ago but I'm not wearing a fedora nowadays either, even though they were fine in the past.

>> No.9479527

>>9479516
Mostly likely right, just like their color, way they sit

>> No.9479529

>>9479527
Is it that they're a bit off black, or just aged?

>> No.9479619
File: 75 KB, 460x587, theresno666inouterspace.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9479619

thoughts?

>> No.9479627

>>9479619
no

>> No.9479630

>>9479504
I can't find the Our Legacy one anywhere though :(

>> No.9479757

>>9479627
WHY N0?

>> No.9480095

>>9479212
Yeah I had it in mind but it's sold out everywhere

>> No.9480100

>>9480095
there's one on ebay uk right now, size M

>> No.9480105

>>9477677
I've handled the Ashton a bunch in the store when getting other stuff, it's put together really nicely and felt like it would be pretty good against the cold.

I'm also a wip fanboy so I may be biased.

>> No.9480165

>>9479417
228

>> No.9480239

>>9477783

I got it on sale. Its pretty good, very warm, puffy when zipped up but not too puffy. Zipper is great too and I like the cigarette pocket.

>> No.9480285
File: 129 KB, 458x607, extra-image-842.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9480285

cop or not?

>> No.9480354
File: 673 KB, 609x612, 1422221872422.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9480354

>>9477778
>>9477784
if i want a baggy fit on a bomber jacket do i literally just size up 1-2 sizes when i order a jacket or are these things made especially for that look

also, pic is the KYC Vintage MA-1

>> No.9480365

>>9480354
P.S., that supreme nike kyc jacket is overpriced AF

it's from some bigcartel store but since they stopped making them these jackets go for ~$300 on ebay
it probably only cost around ~$60 when they still sold it from the store

looks pretty nice, but would not recommend copping from ebay

>> No.9480448

>>9480365
Isn't that just a supreme hoodie under the bomber and not a part of the actual jacket?

>> No.9480483

>>9480448
yes, that is a supreme hoodie underneath the bomber jacket

>> No.9480504
File: 499 KB, 1280x1919, tumblr_niyrsle1bd1sz2wnio1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9480504

>>9478472
Is the alpha bomber really that puffy?

looks okay to me in pic related

people always claim it's overly puffy but i've yet to see anyone post fit pics

>> No.9481648

can anyone rec some bombers for women under 200$?

>> No.9481838

>>9480504
the TT model is very slim fitting, and my favorite bomber I've come across
will post fit in a min

>> No.9481884

>>9480504

>watch over bomber sleeve

Jesus christ

>> No.9481893

>>9480504
w2c bomber
>>9481884
what's wrong with that

>> No.9481905

>>9481893

Seriously? You actualy wear a watch over clothes?

It's just retarded, but whatever floats your boat idgaf

>> No.9481906

>>9481905
No, I don't.
But I never saw that much wrong with it.

>> No.9481923

w2c a slim bomber ?

>> No.9482185

You did not actually press ctrl+f bomber thread

There was one posted 2 days before this and it's still alive

>>9472133

Fuck off we don't need 10 bomber threads on fucking /fa/ because you kids think it's the only good looking jacket.