[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 173 KB, 870x1110, image1xxl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9279438 No.9279438 [Reply] [Original]

What do you think of these sneakers? Basically looking for an inexpensive pair of white sneakers that aren't going to cost me an arm and a leg.

>tfw ausfag so this is the cheapest and best looking thing I could find at the moment

They're Lacoste Marcel Leather Trainers and I can get them for about $77 at the moment

>> No.9279456

a pair of stan smiths are $75 on adidas.com you fucking brick, go get it there, free shippign as well

>> No.9279780

>>9279438
Are these the ones on asos anon? I was looking at them months ago and kinda wished I'd got them now. When I asked /fa/ they told me to go with something without branding (muh minimalism) but I still think the Lacoste crocodile makes them look pretty cute. In the end I gave it a miss bc wasn't 100% on the chunkier toe box for my female feet

>> No.9279803

>>9279438
just get led nigga.

>> No.9279805

>>9279438
aye yo

why do you have a 90's jcpenny polo shirt brand logo on your shoes?

most people equate lacoste's logo with izod

>> No.9279806

>>9279456
Aus site is $120,
can u fucking read before u spout smug bullshit

>> No.9279810

>>9279806
it's your fault for living in a fucking shit tier country

>> No.9279815

K E N T W A N G
E
N
T
W
A
N
G

>> No.9279832

>>9279810
pls die

>> No.9279836

>>9279438
get stan smith navy

looks much better IRL than the green ones

>> No.9279840

>>9279438
They look really pretty imo. For the price of course, I think they're solid. Never got this Stan Smiths thing, this pair looks better for me

>> No.9279865

>>9279438
Just save up a little more and low-ball sellers on grailed for something better until one of them accepts

>> No.9280077

my granddad wears these

>> No.9280082

>>9279438
they look good, I wonder if the croc can be seam picked

>> No.9280183

any thoughts on these ?
>http://axelarigato.com/usd/low-sneaker-20003

>> No.9280192

>>9279456
or go to a discount department store and pay $25 for the same shoes.
>>9279805
is that a bad thing?
>>9280077
womens shoes?
>>9280082
not on leather, it'll show.

>> No.9282079

>>9279780
Yeah these are the ones from asos, they're cheap at the moment so I thought id check them out

>> No.9282085

>>9279805
I think most people in this day and age would ask why I'm wearing crocs

>> No.9282218
File: 425 KB, 1408x1024, 1403239742423.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9282218

>> No.9282237
File: 97 KB, 930x675, vans-old-skool--premium-leather--(true-white)-vzdfewb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9282237

>>9282218
>Vans Slip on
They have way better alternative for basic low whites tho

>> No.9282251

>>9282237
I guess we'll just have to renew the chart, now won't we?

>> No.9284397

>>9279438
Would only look good with all white outfit. OP what is wrong with you

>> No.9284731
File: 25 KB, 400x400, brick.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9284731

>>9284397
s-sorry pls no bully according to >>9279456 I'm pic related ~