[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 169 KB, 1770x783, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234532 No.9234532 [Reply] [Original]

What does /fa/ think about the Raf Simons x Sterling Ruby collection?

Is it worth copping any of it in the sale? I quite like the sweaters. They were a key piece on the catwalk.

>> No.9234538

looks like some bigcartel shit

embarrassing

>> No.9234551

Uninspired weak shit, not surprised it's on sale.
Just like any of Raf's recent collections it's not going to be memorable, and this is coming from somebody who likes Raf.

>> No.9234562

>>9234532
>made in portugal
nty

>> No.9234570
File: 301 KB, 600x550, RafFW14.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234570

>>9234532

i really liked the long bomber and the sweatshirts but they cost way too much for something that is just printed on

>> No.9234583
File: 95 KB, 800x1036, tumblr_nc8bleAzwk1ryq2zfo8_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234583

Raf Simons x Sterling Ruby F/W 14 WILL absolutely be future grails, save this for future reference. I guarantee it.

It's one of raf's most inspiriting and daring releases. Their coats will be wanted by many and will retain their value. Though these are very conservative observation, they will most likely sell for even more in the future.

>> No.9234610

>>9234532
lmao i posted a fair bit about raf/sterling and didn't get many responses in threads or from posts.
now it's on sale and people are asking the same questions i was and im seeing sweatshirts in the waywt because they aren't £260 anymore

the quality of the print (and the sewed in orange patch) is good, not sure about the sweat itself. the necks on raf sweatshirts are always good because they're high and tight. as for the prints, if you like it, buy it. i hope you were talking about quality when you asked if these are 'worth copping'

you said you like them and they're cheap now so what's the problem. 3rd is the best one imo. just be sure that you like them and not the label

>>9234583
i agree with this. you're certain to see people posting about some of the sweats like people post about the gradient sweats

>> No.9234617

>>9234583
the coats for sure will be grails
but, do you to type like such an asshole? this is 4chan not your shitty fashion blog, not even /fa/cist types like that

>> No.9234621

>>9234551
Well put....well put

RAF Simons fucking fell off in the 90's

Niggas suits were $299 on fucking yoox for awhile. Less than some menswarehouse bullshit

>> No.9234627

>>9234583
Spending your money on American houses in 2007 is a better investment than this.

>> No.9234634

>>9234627
bur

>> No.9234648

>>9234634
Fuck, I knew I should have gone for the Ruble joke.

>> No.9234658
File: 664 KB, 1669x3264, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234658

The only Raf sweaters worth buying are the dip dye ones.

>> No.9234847

>>9234658
>in my plebeian opinion

>> No.9234986
File: 28 KB, 345x460, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234986

>>9234847
lolno Raf dip dyes are absolute fire. This one is my personal favourite

>> No.9234992
File: 15 KB, 320x320, picardcostume.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234992

>>9234986
Star Trek core

>> No.9234995

>>9234986
Looks like a Dior Fahrenheit bottle

>> No.9235020

>>9234986
could you not just take some dye in a bucket and DIY it or am i overthinking things

>> No.9235084
File: 40 KB, 360x540, raf-simons-retrospective-2014-fall-winter-editorial-for-032c-magazine-11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235084

gotta love the coats

>> No.9235091

>>9235084
>fat
triggered as hell
someone stop raf, this is very problematic

>> No.9235195

>>9234532
no. if this didnt have rafs name on it nobody would buy it because it looks lame af

>> No.9235200

>>9234583
the coats are different. OP asked about the sweaters and those suck

>> No.9235206

>>9234986
lol @ you comparing the pink/orange abomination to the other dip dye

>> No.9235207

>>9235195
or we just recognize good design

>> No.9235220

>>9235206
but the pink/orange one works better than >>9234986 tbh

people should just leave this forum if they have no understanding of design

>> No.9235232

>>9234538
this

>> No.9235362

eh, i like it. i copped the fathers tee since it was on sale so idrc, wouldnt buy at full retail tho.

>> No.9235381
File: 899 KB, 250x188, tumblr_n254pmd7R81qfo87uo2_250.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235381

>>9235220
>people should just leave this forum if they have no understanding of design

>> No.9235462
File: 146 KB, 533x800, Raf_Simons_FW14details_26.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235462

The coats and parkas that actually have Sterlings work on them are fuckin incredible, to bad for the 20k price tag on most. Besides that some of the pants are interesting but pretty difficult to pull off well. The cropped bombers are beautiful but for 2k I would just find something much more well made that I probably like more anyways, same with the extra long bomber. As for the prints most of them suck I do like the print with the open plant pods but that's about it. Not even going into shoes 85% are trash. Overall it was a nice show to look at but that's about it SS15 was much better in my eyes. The tackiness of the prints could have been completely negated if he had done what he used to and made the prints patches and then sewn them on. Then I would be willing to consider the prices a little more. I like that Raf is seemingly bringing back later 90s-early 2000s Raf but if it continues to be like this I don't know if that's all that good.

>pic related is my favorite piece from the show

>> No.9235616

It's just more of raf's le ebic vaporwave shit that he's been pushing for the last 4 years but with sterling's designs because he couldn't think of anything new.

It's like a piece of art, just buy it if you like it, raf has decent hype to at least pretty much keep the value and sterling doesnt collab often.

like everyone is saying coats>pants>shirts/sweaters>shoes

>> No.9235716

>>9235462
What the fuck is of that obnoxious FATHERS shit about though. Mans got some serious daddy issues.

>> No.9235750
File: 242 KB, 1366x2048, AA2X0038.1366x2048.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235750

The SS15 Raf Smiths in all black are gonna be next years must have sneakers. You heard it here first.

>> No.9235776
File: 526 KB, 1366x2048, RAF_1299.1366x2048.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235776

Why does Raf dress like absolute shit most of the time? Black socks with beaten white shoes. He could at least make an effort.

That shirt looks like something I made in an arts and crafts course in college.

>> No.9235790
File: 576 KB, 606x609, Screen Shot 2014-12-22 at 21.51.26.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235790

>>9235750
They've actually put his face on next seasons models. It's hilarious.

>> No.9235801

>>9235716

>lacking artistic perspective

Just maybe it has something to do with cultural Marxism and how families are being destroyed, and fathers being emasculated? The middle one in OP says it all.

>> No.9235814
File: 934 KB, 2000x2664, 68716.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235814

Quite like this. Cop or not? £120 in the sale.

>> No.9235840

>>9235776
not giving a fuck is the most /fa/

>> No.9235909

>>9235840

This

level of "effay" depends on the amount of fucks given

>> No.9235937
File: 27 KB, 512x384, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235937

>>9235801
A good artist creates a pionant piece of work with an intentional deep and a layered meaning.

A shit artists creates his work and they shoehorns thinks of a deep pretentious meaning after a he's made it.

HURR heres a picture of some sharks and earth. The shark represents the hunger of capitalism and how it's swallowing the worlds soul. We decided to do a shitty heat transfer instead of a decent printing method so it would
deteriorate after washing it once to convey the destruction of the Middle East.

>> No.9235955

>>9235814
>he is paid to look that ugly

>> No.9235981

>>9234532
Those look so fucking bad... I can't imagine anyone wanting to wear these for any other reason than them being Rafs.

>> No.9236003

>>9235937

Hey, I don't even like raf because obvious reasons. But not being able to understand the whole "fathers" thing is a new level of dormancy. You make a great point- but in this case it should be pretty fucking obvious. Also, its a fucking graphic on a shirt, nothing else. If this were a different medium your point would make more sense

>> No.9236062

>>9235750
these look dope, what's the price?

>> No.9236064

>>9236003
I bet you think Wikipedia pages printed on shirts has a deep and compelling meaning, right?

>> No.9236138
File: 38 KB, 376x471, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9236138

>>9236064

Could be, depending on the observer- I'd just call you a tryhard faggot though.

>forgetting that art is subjective

O I am laffin

>> No.9236232

>>9236062
Dunno probs around the £200 mark.

>> No.9236241

>>9234532

Outerwear and knitwear were strongest styles. Bleached denim stuff is cool, but not for everyone.

>> No.9236283

>>9235716
wrist wrist wrist wrist wrist wrist

>> No.9236289

>>9235814
yeah wear with white oxford fully buttoned and and cropped trousers. also you have to be handsome.

>> No.9236347

>>9236138
>>9236064
>>9236003
>>9235937
>>9235801
>>9235716
This should clear it up

>What does the ‘father’ print signify?
RS: Well, it’s a very loaded word, of course. It’s about responsibility. It’s a word that we placed there for everyone to perceive it. I think we were both always attracted to a certain kind of iconic wording. It’s not your average word. It’s got a lot to do with how you feel as a man, and this being a men’s collection that was quite important, next to some imagery that comes in such as sharks, which are about danger. It has a lot do with how we think and how we stand now in the world, and also where both art and men’s fashion stand in the world.

>> No.9236350

>>9236347
Lmao.

>> No.9236354

>>9236347
In the same interview they also mention that the coats are oversized almost like a child wearing his fathers clothes. That could also be another interpretation of the word rather than the other pretentious bullshit that other guy was saying.

>> No.9236358

>>9236347
That basically sounds like Raf is saying he doesn't have a clue what the fuck the word means.

>> No.9236364

>>9235790
That's fucking hilarious

>> No.9236383

>>9236354
>implying the theme behind these pieces are "babby's first menswear"

A new level of pretentious

>> No.9236426
File: 1.41 MB, 606x609, 1419285129307.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9236426

>> No.9236430

>>9236062
probably gonna cost the same as the current season raf stan smiths

>> No.9236447

>>9234570
the long bombers were cool

>>9234532
yeah it's worth it if you like it OP

>> No.9236457

>>9236426
Based baldchan strikes again

>> No.9236475

>>9236426

This made my fucking night, you still exist? t-thank you based baldchan!

>> No.9236478 [DELETED] 

>>9236426
is that the real shoe or is that shooped?

>> No.9236483

>>9236426
Thank you baldchan

>> No.9236484
File: 453 KB, 160x120, yeh.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9236484

>>9236426

>> No.9236491 [DELETED] 

>>9236478
I come from the front page, I'm retarded, these post will self destruct as soon as the delete lets me

>> No.9236497

>>9236358

Actually it sounds like he's telling you to reevaluate YOUR definition of the word father.

>> No.9236507
File: 157 KB, 410x312, 1419070911160.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9236507

>>9236426
>mfw he even did stan smith on the other sneaker too

>> No.9236547

>>9235814
cop, this one's my favorite of the collection

>> No.9236651
File: 1.12 MB, 2236x2236, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9236651

>>9235814
Cop, it's not as try hard and adorned with meaningless graphics and art school bleach splatters. The plain sweaters are always the grails of each Raf collection.

Pic related.

>> No.9236680
File: 78 KB, 640x801, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9236680

Usually what I'm dressed in

>> No.9236700

>>9235084
is he wearing the raf moonboots? they look sick there

>> No.9236713

>>9236680
usually what im embarrassed in
that retarded ass caption

>> No.9236717

>>9235084
Would love it if it didn't have that FATHERS print

>> No.9236805

>>9236680

Most likely is better looking than you along with having more $.

>> No.9236876
File: 214 KB, 533x800, Raf_Simons_FW14details_29.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9236876

>>9236651
Embarrassing. how does it feel to have shitty bland taste?

>> No.9237030
File: 529 KB, 617x592, shiggy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237030

Raf S/S 15

>> No.9237333

bump bc this is the only good thread atm

>> No.9237405
File: 127 KB, 800x533, 1079491.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237405

What do you guys prefer Rafs ss15 or fw14? I personally much preferred ss15. I actually really liked the prints in this season and found them much more tasteful than fw14. I know a lot of people didn't like the sailor jackets with the prints on the back but after some reading up on them I appreciated them much more. Plus I fully expect the hand beaded tanks to become huge grails.

Also how do you feel about the fact he will be continuing to work with Sterling on an entirely separate brand?

>> No.9237424
File: 678 KB, 167x250, tumblr_mchb9xfBi71ru1dtlo1_250.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237424

>>9236680
>not having 3 100 emojis
>not catching your ops lackin
>lackin

sheiiittt

>> No.9237432
File: 10 KB, 215x185, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237432

>>9236680
i love his hair HNNNNNG

>> No.9237470

>>9235462
>>9236347
shut up

>> No.9237479

>>9237470
Nah

>> No.9237483

eli5, who's sterling rugby and why did raf colab with him?

>> No.9238275
File: 18 KB, 250x267, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9238275

>>9237405
>Also how do you feel about the fact he will be continuing to work with Sterling on an entirely separate brand?

Source on this?

>> No.9238288 [DELETED] 
File: 18 KB, 338x254, 1418597432368.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9238288

wow look at all the shit opinions of teenagers ITT

a classic to be sure
save this post
mark my words
head my remarks
write this down in your dream diary
remember remember the 5th of novemenrbe

>> No.9238292

>>9236347
>>9235462

this was the cringiest thing i've ever read, god you're a faggot

>> No.9238295 [DELETED] 
File: 192 KB, 1024x693, 1418635724556.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9238295

>>9238288
>88

>> No.9238322

>>9234532

Shit x Trash

>> No.9238431

>>9235790
I hope this is real

>> No.9238538
File: 150 KB, 980x1499, 2005-10-alexander-mcqueen-lee-shows-his-support-for-kate-moss-mcqueen-show-ss2006.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9238538

>>9235776
McQueen always dressed like shit, and he's still lorded as the fucking king of the world by the fashion press.

>> No.9238545

>>9234532
b8

>> No.9238551

>>9238538
McQueens collections are pure trash though. His woman's stuff is okay but menswear is pure dog.

>> No.9238571

>>9238551

skullz.


skullz errrwhere

>> No.9238629

>>9238551
YES! I totally agree, it pisses me off how he's treated as God sometimes (not on /fa/ though)

>> No.9239000

Raf Simons is a talentless hack who just rips off Richard Owens designs.

>> No.9239007
File: 77 KB, 360x243, Bildschirmfoto 2014-12-23 um 16.38.02.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239007

>>9238551
I think the line does some particular things really well. Like tassel loafers.

>>9238629
Well he's dead so HE isn't, but maybe the house is.

>> No.9239077

>>9238551
he wasnt famous for his menswear
and his womans stuff was more than just okay, youre just a hater

>> No.9239086
File: 91 KB, 999x509, 15-alexander-mcqueen-spring-summer-1998-ss98-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239086

>>9239077
Is this now a McQueen appreciation thread?

>> No.9239101

>>9239077
he was a Saville row tailoring drop out who made broadway costumes for affluent women to wear daily

and printed skulls on everything who could not afford the affluent marketed show pieces

he was the definition of early 00's LOOK-AT-ME clothes

>aren't all designer clothes look at me clothes

no, not at all

>> No.9239564

>>9239077
He was a talentless hack just like Raf Owens.

>> No.9239641

>>9235776
2 nxtlvl for you, you're pleb mind only understands what /fa/ is considered "cool", it simply can't comprehend his sick fits

>> No.9239656
File: 135 KB, 640x379, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239656

>>9234532

>> No.9239661
File: 199 KB, 800x534, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239661

>> No.9239665

>>9239656
Now that is pimp

>> No.9239699

>>9239661
it looks like the toebox has been chopped off

>> No.9239703
File: 755 KB, 600x800, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239703

http://vimeo.com/23506143

>>9239665
Totally

>>9239699
Bata inspired

>> No.9239705

>>9237030
Underrated post

>> No.9239725

>>9239661
this is the ugliest piece I have ever seen in my entire life.
I hope raf feels embarrassed for the rest of his life for making this

>> No.9239735

>>9239656

Embarrassing

>> No.9239736
File: 15 KB, 283x464, raf-simons-sterling-ruby-collection-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239736

Like the other times I'm only here for image dumping,someone will appreciate hopefully.

Raf x Ruby Sterling SS10

>> No.9239741
File: 14 KB, 294x470, raf-simons-sterling-ruby-collection-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239741

>>9239736

>> No.9239745
File: 26 KB, 311x476, raf-simons-sterling-ruby-collection-3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239745

>> No.9239751
File: 34 KB, 372x485, raf-simons-sterling-ruby-collection-4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239751

>>9239745

>> No.9239753
File: 11 KB, 264x481, raf-simons-sterling-ruby-collection-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239753

>>9239751

>> No.9239755
File: 26 KB, 349x444, raf-simons-sterling-ruby-collection-6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239755

>>9239753

>> No.9239758
File: 29 KB, 341x413, raf-simons-sterling-ruby-collection-7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239758

>>9239755

>> No.9239761

>>9239736
I didn't know they collaborated in the past.

>> No.9239765
File: 33 KB, 393x487, raf-simons-sterling-ruby-collection-8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239765

>>9239758

>> No.9239770
File: 24 KB, 540x400, raf-simons-sterling-ruby-collection-front.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239770

>>9239765

>> No.9239773
File: 151 KB, 533x800, 1403807506002.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239773

>>9239735
so are you ;)

>> No.9239774

>>9239761
it's okay i was never aware of RS before 2013 lol

>> No.9239832

>>9239736
>>9239741
>>9239745
>>9239751
>>9239753
>>9239755
>>9239758
>>9239770
>>9239765
thanks, these are great

>> No.9239874

>>9238275
Multiple interviews

>> No.9239879

>>9238292
How so? The first comment was a pretty unbiased statement, and the second one was literally just a quote from an interview. Fuck yourself cunt

>> No.9239888

>>9239879
u care too much

>> No.9239893

>>9239832
good to hear dude!

>> No.9239918

>>9239888
Yeah probably

>> No.9239962

>>9237405
SS15 might be my favorite runway show of all time, I'm dead serious. I'm buying the sailor cape coat as soon as it's for sale, either that or I will buy one of those tanks, I can't decide yet. My only concern is the way that they are handling the imageboard designs on the rest of the lower end collection, ie. just fucking throwing the images onto the front of a plain t-shirt or the back of a black hoodie. It's lazy and gross...

fw14 was great too, I feel like Raf has been on a comeback since ss14 after his fallout in 09

>> No.9240010

>>9239918
need my dome waxed bb
pls be in arendelle

>> No.9240024

>>9237405
SS15 was the runway equivalent of Boards of Canada. Dunno just got that vibe

>> No.9240047
File: 1.63 MB, 1100x1221, rs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9240047

>>9237405
SS15 by a long shot

>> No.9240119

>you will never like shit designers like raf simons
feels good

>> No.9240126

>>9240119
People are merely pretending to like his most recent stuff because most stockists realize it's shit and thus put it on deep sale.

Birthday is Raf's new target market.
Most people who were seriously into Raf have all realized he dropped off, it's as simple as that considering where he is now.

>> No.9240129

>>9239656
i wonder what the markup on that thing is... 10 grand? 20?

>> No.9240214

>>9234532
I think it looks awesome

>> No.9240426

>>9234610
>the gradient sweats
People only bought those because they were too afraid to cop any of his cooler shit but still wanted to have a piece from a ~cool intrnt fashun designer~

>> No.9240465

>>9240426
No people bought them because the were cheap as fuck. Stop trying to be all patrician about it you have shit taste just accept it.

>> No.9240492

>>9234986
>using the term 'fire'
hypebeast Raf-dickrider detected.

Raf makes sweaters much nicer than those, sorry mate.

>> No.9240508

>>9240426
normies appreciate dip-dye but its kinda fashun at the same time. its a good ethical cop

>> No.9240533

>>9237405
Loved both, his best collections in a long time.

Personally I liked f/w14 better, but that seems to be just me.

>> No.9241014

>>9240126
>If you like Raf's new stuff you're not REAL FAN

You're a piece of shit.

>> No.9241067

>>9240465
only the cream/navy ones were 'cheap as fuck'
none of the good 2012/2013 ones were on such a heavy sale
you cant just say things. people need to stop just saying things

>> No.9242948

>>9241067
The green/black and red/white ones were in the sale a few seasons ago as was the pink/orange one. For many the red/black is a Grail that sells for more than retail second hand.

>> No.9242999

>>9240508
>ethical
you dont know what that word means

>> No.9243007

>>9242999
what does it mean?

>> No.9243014 [DELETED] 

>>9243007
>007

nice dude

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ethical

>> No.9244823

>>9236347
I think we should just ignore this fucking collection.

It's fogged by ambiguity. We'll never come to a conclusion that doesn't make us sound like some deep art house students or some shit.

>>9236138
>assuming
:^)
Still love you Anon, Raf just get's me really riled up sometimes.

>> No.9244837

>>9239736
We always appreciate it Troal
We just don't say it sometimes

>> No.9244895
File: 802 KB, 3252x4877, 1410474253876.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9244895

>YES
>YES
>YES

>> No.9244907

>>9244895
ID on shoes please

>> No.9244910

>>9240508
You literally couldn't stop cumming over your dip-due when you first got it cunt. Stop talking and leave. Ok?

>> No.9244922

>>9241067
Well the Navy/Yellow one was what started the meme and it was cheap as fuck so yeah I can say things because I know wat Im saying. If were playing that game you shouldn't fucking talk because you obviously didn't own or have the slightest idea of what is going on because the navy sweater everyone had was only so hated on because the top was yellow not cream. Which was attrocious

>> No.9244927

>>9244895
he looks like his dad just called him a fag lol

>> No.9244932

>>9244907
Probably red wing postmans

>> No.9245000
File: 44 KB, 400x347, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9245000

>>9244895
Looks good. Might cop now that it's half price literally everywhere. Either this or one of the printed ones.

>> No.9245159

>>9244895
RW

>> No.9245376
File: 200 KB, 1800x1182, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9245376

Which one should I cop and why? They have all three on sale in my nearest department store.

>> No.9245499

>>9239656
beautiful

>> No.9245504

>>9245376
far right

>> No.9245549

>>9245376

far right or far left

>> No.9245628

>>9244895
what fucking turtleneck is that
looks good as fuck

>> No.9245654

>>9245376

far right

>> No.9245673 [DELETED] 

>>9241014
it would actually make you a new fan, not a real fan.

lurk more

birthday is some 13 year old who stumbled upon /fa/ one day and decided to become a try hard

>> No.9245708

>>9245376
1 and 3 obviously

>> No.9245721
File: 95 KB, 529x1408, 11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9245721

I copped this one for pretty cheap. Think it's pretty underrated.
The quilt is cool and the words on the bottom remind me of the scrolling text on busses/subways.

A cool detail is that when you flip the bottom up if has FATHERS stitched onto that side.

>> No.9245726

>>9235814
where is it on sale?

>> No.9245731

>>9244895
looks really good :)

>> No.9245739

>>9245721
looks dope as fuck under black parka.

Was slow and didn't cop the blue sweater with striped trim before it sold out :(

I think the best pieces this season are the ones that were shown off less, and the coats of course. Those are going to be in high demand in 5-10 years, calling it now.

>> No.9245753

>>9245726
country you're from and your size?

>> No.9245759

>>9245753
S, canada

>> No.9245763

>>9245753
other response wasn't me, but canada also, M

>> No.9245767

>>9245376
middle is the best, /fa/ plebs will tell you to avoid color at all costs

right is good too

>> No.9245794

>>9234562
go back to your chinese shit fag