[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 63 KB, 800x500, 1388782839711.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230028 No.9230028 [Reply] [Original]

Other one at 300
Respond to every post edition
If somebody posts a potential cop you are obligated to respond with your opinion if you're in the thread--this way people get a whole lot more advice and shitty cops can be avoided

>> No.9230059
File: 151 KB, 800x533, qasass15.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230059

>> No.9230084

>>9230059

na, they look mediocre to me

>> No.9230100
File: 1.70 MB, 2047x1365, Clarks-Naylor-Top-Tan-Leather-04.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230100

Clarks naylor theyre 90 quid

>> No.9230104
File: 1.48 MB, 2048x1365, Clarks-Naylor-Top-Tan-Leather-15 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230104

>>9230100

>> No.9230107

>>9230100
They look a little too busy, the red and blue on the sole along with the contrasting browns and all the stitching puts me off
Not completely terrible though
>>9230104
They look better folded but once again the tartan seems a little much

>> No.9230150
File: 54 KB, 620x400, afp6hfphljymcfmsv8tp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230150

Wil Fry 'Expensive Jacket'

>> No.9230171

>>9230150
It's funny but I wouldn't wear it.

People aren't following the rule so I guess this thread is a failure lmao

>> No.9230199
File: 180 KB, 952x1083, nb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230199

which one?

>> No.9230202

>>9230199
personally prefer the top one

>> No.9230224
File: 180 KB, 960x668, 16356_909715799057760_3279932712430640052_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230224

Should I?

>> No.9230234

>>9230199
definitely the first one, dont like 420s generally though

>>9230224
looks alright

>> No.9230245

>>9230202
>>9230234
I was debating the green/orange pair because I keep hearing that new balances should have color and they're 10$ cheaper. I'm looking at the 420 model because its the closet thing nb does to a racing flat.

>w2c good looking racing flat?

>> No.9230253
File: 92 KB, 1182x1023, $_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230253

Gotta go fast..?

>> No.9230257

>>9230059
>>9230100
nuh

>>9230150
hell nuh

>>9230199
top

>> No.9230318

>>9230253
no.

>> No.9230347

>>9230318
it's just for laffs m8

>> No.9230372
File: 88 KB, 500x333, ptbt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230372

>> No.9230396
File: 100 KB, 640x957, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230396

????

>> No.9230414

>>9230100
they're alright, but don't fold them down

>> No.9230999
File: 71 KB, 1000x1000, S001C-Front-1000x1000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9230999

pls help

http://stockwatches.com.au/shop/s001c/

>> No.9231001
File: 172 KB, 1600x1600, $_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231001

Yay/nay? Nike NSW White Label

>> No.9231005
File: 67 KB, 600x600, copornot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231005

>>9230028
should i buy these fa ?

>> No.9231007

>>9230999
cop
>>9231001
meh

>> No.9231008

>>9230372
nice
>>9230396
no
>>9230999
very nice
>>9231001
futuristic

>> No.9231012

http://www.aldoshoes.com/uk/en_UK/men/boots/formal-boots/c/232/HETHIN/p/34757191-97

Would these work with slim dark wool trousers?

>> No.9231018

>>9231008
that does not look futuristic by any standard.

>> No.9231019

>>9231005
n

>> No.9231025
File: 20 KB, 514x514, 281672_mai.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231025

What do you think? Seems warm enough.


>>9231005
Nah.

>>9231001

Hell Nah

>>9230224

Yes

>> No.9231046
File: 99 KB, 400x266, ornah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231046

?????
it's Geller but I don't wanna buy it just bc it's designer

>> No.9231053
File: 728 KB, 2448x1836, DQKtbLt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231053

>>9231007
>>9231008
>>9231018
>>9231025

aight thanks. Thoughts on the Inneva still? I've got a chance to cop some for $180.

>> No.9231062

>>9231025
that hoodie is hideous. Quilted clothing is horrible.

>> No.9231064

>>9231053
>nice knock-off flyknits anon!
personally I think they look nice though

>> No.9231068
File: 563 KB, 2000x2664, 71227.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231068

Thoughts?

>> No.9231069

>>9231046
looks nice
>probably

>> No.9231084

>>9231062
>that hoodie is hideous. Quilted clothing is horrible.

Stuck now...

Need a jacket under £100 that'll help me through winter and isn't a Parka.

Any suggestions on where to look?

>> No.9231093

what does 'cop or not' mean? new /fa/scist here

>> No.9231099

>>9231068
just get some NB 574 fag

>> No.9231101

>>9231093
cop = purchase

>> No.9231102

>>9231093
Purchase or not.
Acquire or abstain.

>> No.9231104

>>9231068
I agree with
>>9231099

the shoes you posted are obv nike's rip off of the classic NB style

>> No.9231105

>>9231093
cop = buy
not cop = don't buy
w2c = where to cop

>> No.9231107
File: 155 KB, 620x532, ohgoodnoplsplsfagit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231107

>>9231064
b-b-but i thought that roshe run woven was that

>> No.9231151
File: 313 KB, 1024x683, Filling-Pieces-Feature-LV-9370.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231151

y/n?

>> No.9231158

>>9231151
a thousand times yes

>> No.9231252

>>9231099
>nearly 2015
>Getting NB.

>> No.9231323

>>9231151
those are boots buddy

you want boots?

cause they're boots

>> No.9231337

>>9231151
got to be the most bullshit sole ive seen, hell na

>> No.9231339
File: 31 KB, 384x449, ccc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231339

>> No.9231380
File: 230 KB, 1600x1200, $_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231380

?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Lacoste-White-Leather-Low-Top-Fashion-Sneakers-Size-11-5-Boat-Shoes-/281528286055?pt=US_Men_s_Shoes&hash=item418c64bb67

>> No.9231392

>>9231151
dope af

>> No.9231402

>>9230396
Def cop
>>9231005
Dnc
>>9231053
Cop

>> No.9231430
File: 748 KB, 2000x2000, s7-1132898_lifestyl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231430

>>9230028

>> No.9231475

>>9231380
no

>> No.9231490

>>9230059
Ye>>9230372
Ye>>9231012
Depends>>9231430
Ye

>> No.9231494
File: 44 KB, 469x474, u0lf3vpexnsr2tfdumuk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231494

Pls help amigos, jacket fyi

>> No.9231495
File: 112 KB, 1000x1000, 1310035352-06312300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231495

>>9231475
this instead?
>>9231380
or this?

>> No.9231498
File: 16 KB, 327x436, captcha.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231498

>>9231490
>Depends>>9231430 (You)

on what

>> No.9231521
File: 149 KB, 1024x1024, coppernaught.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231521

>>9231019
>>9231025
>>9231402
another view, im sorely tempted

>> No.9231557
File: 47 KB, 440x440, MIGN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231557

y/n?

>> No.9231595

>>9231557
y if reasonably priced

>> No.9231611

>>9231521
i dig
if you like them then buy them...
brand?

>> No.9231736

>>9231611
>brand?
some kickstarter called hydrogen one

>> No.9231739
File: 214 KB, 1000x1000, 18-12-2014_mki_cashmeremerinorollneckknit_grey_1_bm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231739

Anyone got any experience with MKI? c/n?

>> No.9231841
File: 43 KB, 1000x439, 5f5ec356-ce74-4ee6-a32d-a665bf3d804e[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231841

thoughts?

>> No.9231845
File: 33 KB, 465x606, 71HVcaJzKDL._UY606_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231845

>>9231841
c/n?

>> No.9231860

>>9231845
sorry i didn't mean to link
pls forgive me

>> No.9231878
File: 10 KB, 300x250, bfd5f30ab2244e6e8fd1e8333e0b5184[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231878

>>9231860
youre forgiven, and no id think that jackets a good cop, looks a little tacky and cheap, maybe look for a barbour or a fjallraven greenland jacket if youre looking for something in that vein

>> No.9231881
File: 35 KB, 417x417, AW14_PM400886_000_C1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231881

What do you think?

>> No.9231891

>>9231841
cop

also w2c because I've been looking for a pair with the navy tab in the premium version. Being amerifat is suffering

>> No.9231893

>>9231841
na
>>9231845
yes

>> No.9231902
File: 38 KB, 185x247, 2235132[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9231902

>>9231891
there's a pair in my local shoe shop what the fuck is wrong with your country that you cant even buy a basic model within 50 km or some shit
thats wack dude get out of there now bf its too late

>> No.9231915

>>9231902
Fug :DDD

The problem is that the only ones I can find are the shitty cheap ones with worse leather and the plasticy tab. Maybe if I lived in a more high fashion place I might find some stores with it, but I haven't found any or seen any shops. Oh well, cop anyways. They are still at a point where they are nice and clean looking and aren't going to crash into the ground like a lot of other meme sneakers.

Maybe I'll just keep hunting for the premium leather jack purcells...

>> No.9231923

>>9231915
fair nuf m8 av a good one

>> No.9232328
File: 188 KB, 1600x1195, $_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9232328

I love the Chelsea's aesthetics, but I am not sure. It will be my first

What do you think of this ones? I can cop it for like 50$.

>> No.9232442
File: 82 KB, 555x247, seeley.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9232442

If I was a size smaller I'd have an easier time finding shoes. Thoughts on these?

>> No.9232513
File: 442 KB, 466x480, 48234892952.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9232513

but the print extends onto the ribbing
fall jumper

>> No.9232517
File: 109 KB, 397x260, Screen Shot 2014-12-21 at 6.26.54 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9232517

I love these but I want some opinions first

Advice incoming

>> No.9232528

>>9232513
do not cop this
>>9232442
not
>>9232328
not
>>9231881
cop
>>9231845
cop
>>9231841
NOT
>>9231739
cop
>>9231557
cop
>>9231521
really depends, if they're relatively cheap I'd say cop

>>9232517
me

>> No.9232560

>>9232513
cop this
>>9232442
cop
>>9232328
cop
>>9231881
not
>>9231845
not
>>9231841
COP
>>9231739
not
>>9231557
not

>> No.9232575
File: 35 KB, 596x600, 81gMB5dw6CL._UY600_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9232575

Cop for 120 instead of a pair of mono 1460s?

>> No.9232577

>>9232528

I am the Chelsea Boots guy.

Could you please explain why you didn't like them? Can you give a cheap alternative to them?

>> No.9232582

>>9232517
Not a fan >>9232517

>> No.9232586

>>9232577
Now that I'm taking a closer look, I change my mind. As long as you're wearing black jeans they could be pretty sick

>> No.9232587
File: 356 KB, 1272x430, rclubc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9232587

Either of these?

>> No.9232628

>>9232586

So no dark blue jean? I was thinking of wearing it with black jean, but also with dark blue jeans.

White shirt, dark blue jeans and the chelseas. NO?

>> No.9232641

>>9232587
right if you really must
there are better shoes in that style for cheaper too though

>> No.9232645

>>9232641
>there are better shoes in that style for cheaper too though
Would you mind sharing which ones? Only reeboks came to mind.

>> No.9232655
File: 191 KB, 588x414, royals.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9232655

>>9232587

>> No.9232663

>>9232645
literally every big sneaker company makes a similar design
NB, Nike, Adidas, Le Coq Sportif etc.
Just look up all of these brands and see what you like or go to a shoe store and try some on

>> No.9232666

>>9232513
w2c

>> No.9232673

>>9232666
weeb.net/a/ssholes

>> No.9232694
File: 155 KB, 870x1110, image1xxl[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9232694

>>9232673

>> No.9232708

>>9232694
Shit I gave no explanation. I am looking for something along the lines of this (wool, similar shape maybe, a versatile color preferable) without the branding on the front and it's proving too difficult. Anyone know w2c something like it?

>> No.9232738
File: 109 KB, 820x1000, 078872_sub2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9232738

Thinking of copping this for the welfare range or getting a harrington from Ben Sherman in the cheap range.
>pls respond quickly

>> No.9232744
File: 900 KB, 870x1110, bestchaika.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9232744

>>9232708
you should have explained sooner

>> No.9232864
File: 182 KB, 975x1463, NtpJtBH[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9232864

For only 100 dollhairs

>> No.9232947

>>9232864
Iffy, leaning towards naw

>> No.9232961

>>9232864
u cocksucker how about you state what you want, the hat, jacket, or shirt

>> No.9232965
File: 136 KB, 860x756, pick2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9232965

Choose 2.

>> No.9232973

>>9232965
middle right

>> No.9232975

>>9232961
I thought it was fairly obvious, if I wanted the cap then I wouldn't have posted a picture up to the waist and if I wanted the shirt I wouldn't post a picture where most of it is covered by the jacket.
The jacket is what I want/am not sure about. Goes for like 70.

>> No.9232980

>>9232961

probably the jacket you autist

>> No.9233225
File: 251 KB, 779x743, Italian cashmere cardigan sweater J.Crew cashmere J.Crew.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9233225

Where is a another good place to cop a cashmere cardigan like J Crews'?

I don't want any design on it or nothin, just plain ol navy like this.. (and the buttons are a dark brown that blends in with the navy, in the photo they just appear white cause of glare).


I'm prolly gunna buy this one because although I don't buy J Crews stuff cause it's overpriced for the material I actually already own this one but after having it for 7+ years it has several holes in it and I love it enough to buy it again. IMO J Crew's cashmere items are worth the money.


To me $250 is definitely worth it if I can wear it and love it for 5 years or more

>> No.9233232

>>9232965
middle and right

>> No.9233245
File: 595 KB, 1014x674, Cashmere Button Front Cardigan Brooks Brothers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9233245

>>9233225

This is brooks brothers cashmere cardi for $350

made from scottish cashmere, while J Crew is from italian


only thing I don't really like is the walnut buttons, they are kinda large and stick out. I know I could just easily sew on different buttons but I'd rather not.


plus I already know I like the J Crew one...but im still hesitant cause it's J Crew


ah who am I kidding I never see /fa/ talk about cardigans lmao

>> No.9233481
File: 51 KB, 660x495, 1901m73_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9233481

chippewa service oxford

too workwear for minimal fits ?

>> No.9233509
File: 90 KB, 975x1463, 31826704_004_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9233509

Does anybody know if this is legit?

http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?id=31826704&color=004&cm_mmc=SEM-_-Google-_-PLA-_-82529916904product_type_l1m%26product_type_l2shoes%26product_type_l3sneakers%26brandnew_balan&adpos=1o2&creative=59141293624&device=c&matchtype=&network=g&gclid=COeu47Hoy8ICFYhefgodfLoAtA#/

>> No.9233515

>>9233225
>>9233245
cardigans are gay as fuck, kid

>> No.9233520

>>9233515
tru tru

>> No.9233521

>>9233245

>>9233515
This. $350 for that amount of thread is disgusting. I'll pay $350 for a Stutterheim raincoat or a nice pair of leather shoes.

>> No.9233527
File: 4 KB, 200x250, asd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9233527

National Standard Lace Up Hi Tops?

>> No.9233534

>>9233509
>http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?id=31826704&color=004&cm_mmc=SEM-_-Google-_-PLA-_-82529916904product_type_l1m%26product_type_l2shoes%26product_type_l3sneakers%26brandnew_balan&adpos=1o2&creative=59141293624&device=c&matchtype=&network=g&gclid=COeu47Hoy8ICFYhefgodfLoAtA#/
newfag detected

>> No.9233542

>>9233521
>>9233515
>>9233520


Lmao it will always amaze me how close minded some people on fa can be.

Cardigans are srsly the best comfycore item, something that's a sweater but also something that you can layer effortlessly and wear for weather that isn't too cold and not too hot

I love wearing my cardi round the house and at work


Anyway ur on fa and your seriously saying spending $350 on "thread" is disgusting?

Lmao kid, money is relative. What is a lot for you isn't for others. It's definitely worth it if it's something you'll wear for five or more years

>> No.9233557

>>9233542
it's not about the money it's about sending a message (joker voice)

>> No.9233592

>>9233245
You know J crew actually uses Loro Piana's cashmere? Probably the best out there

>> No.9233616

>>9233534
How?

>> No.9233625

>>9230150
Hell NO!!!

>> No.9233637

>>9233592

Didn't know that, but I def know it's good and really good for the money

Thx!!

>> No.9233665
File: 834 KB, 624x617, 2014-12-22 03_50_02-hol_85576_01_prod1 (JPEG Image, 1200 × 1200 pixels) - Scaled (52%).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9233665

guys, what do ?

>> No.9233671
File: 23 KB, 418x418, 93557023-272d-42bd-9e13-310e60271fdf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9233671

Ye or Na?

>> No.9233681

>>9233665
floral prints r pretty gey

>> No.9233841

>>9233665
>hollister
kill yourself swagfag

>> No.9233873

Found a pair of fake raf Simons Velcro. Kinda tempted C or N

>> No.9233897

>>9232666
http://printallover.me/collections/scarth/products/0000000p-sweatshirt-212

>> No.9233934
File: 96 KB, 705x529, 68468464.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9233934

w2c?

Shirt, pants and shoes.

>> No.9233959
File: 131 KB, 1019x1384, 64R12HYLW_large[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9233959

should I?

>> No.9233960
File: 57 KB, 300x400, 32336UM0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9233960

Should I cop this for 60 USD? I really like it but am hesitant
Someone help

>> No.9233980

>>9233960

looks cool, i like it.

>>9233959

Not a fan, looks a bit boxy. Mustard can be cool, but not a fan of it here.

>> No.9234029

>>9233980
Yeah, I really like it as well, but just hesitating about the price.

>> No.9234065

>>9230059
>>9230150
>>9230199
>>9230372
>>9231068

no
>>9230224
>>9231151
yes, filling pieces are nice

>> No.9234101

>>9233671
Ye

>> No.9234183

>>9233225
cop

>> No.9234256
File: 30 KB, 975x1463, reeboknpc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234256

the only thing i don't like about them is the reebok text logo on the side.

>> No.9234273
File: 200 KB, 898x304, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234273

?

>> No.9234277

>>9234273
Nah

>> No.9234306

>>9234277
How come? I get that the sole is a little clunky but I like that, and I normally go for slim looking boots

>> No.9234323
File: 239 KB, 1600x1066, $_57[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234323

>> No.9234348

>>9234306
If you think they'd look good on you then by all means go ahead and get them
I'm just saying that I don't like them

>> No.9234426

>>9234273
Grenson's, right?

don't do it.

>> No.9234436

Stan smiths for 47bongs? On sale in schuh. Already have a pair of white hi tops though. And what colouring?

>> No.9234437

>>9234323
Eh not sure I'm a huge fan of the shape.

>> No.9234439

>>9234436
only if the premium version and not the shitty plasticy kind.

Most people recommend the green tab, but I'm partial to the navy myself.

>> No.9234465

>>9234439
They're the (m)'s?

Leather upper

>> No.9234484

>>9234465
I'm 90 percent sure that just means men because the other one is w.

I took a look though, and I think you are good. The premium versions are distinguished by a lightly yellower sole and a suede tab instead of whatever the material is usually. The green looks like suede to me, and since you are a europooper, I'm sure the other ones are too.

>> No.9234491

>>9234484
Sweet. Torn between the navy/green

>> No.9234496

>>9234273
Why does effay love all black derbies/brogues so much?

as far as casual fits these really only look good in full monochrome outfits.

are these your first "nice" leather shoes and you thought black is versatile? It's not.

>> No.9234502

>>9234437
the bulge is because there's a shoe tree inside.

there's really not many ways a chukka can be shaped.

>> No.9234516

>>9234491
Depends on your wardrobe I would imagine, plus what you really like about the shoes.

I really like the navy tab, but I feel like the green tab might go better with most pants, because I get the feeling that the navy tab might be a little odd if you are wearing black pants.

But if you prefer your shoes by themselves to make less of a statement, navy is a bit better. I'm not sure how dark it is in person, so I can't really comment on if it is actually that noticeable when you wear something like black

Might give you a little more insight anyways.

>>9234502
Oh okay I gotcha, I say cop then. I just thought that they were naturally that bulgy which kinda threw everything off.

>> No.9234647
File: 62 KB, 900x1130, snake.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234647

Cop?

>> No.9234657
File: 213 KB, 1200x1200, fw14-mk-007-ha-bl_2[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234657

>>9234647
no.

c/n?

>> No.9234683

>>9234657
no

>> No.9234722

I'm wanting to get a leather jacket but not sure how much to spend. I'd like a Rick one but not sure if its style will age well with me. I don't wear all-black, all the time and wonder if it would work with dark blue and raw jeans too.

>> No.9234796

>>9234722
no anon, you can't get a single jacket that looks good with everything.

>> No.9234812
File: 61 KB, 480x360, 2720207-p-MULTIVIEW.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234812

are these cool or retarted?

>> No.9234823

>>9234657
c

>> No.9234841

>>9234812
if you're asian then yeah probably cool, otherwise you may end up looking like a special child

>> No.9234848

>>9234812
Cool if Asian, or white and tall

>> No.9234849

>>9232708
You could just use a seam ripper to get rid of the logo, they're dirt cheap. If not The Woodlands Shop has some pretty clean 5 panels

>> No.9234855
File: 79 KB, 820x820, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234855

C/n?

>> No.9234909

>>9234796

I thought leather, jeans and a tee as casual wear would generally be fine.

>> No.9234929

>>9234909
the jacket is black or brown?

>> No.9234944
File: 8 KB, 311x394, 44718453MA_11_f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234944

Tech runners in black/white or black /black?

>> No.9234951
File: 6 KB, 311x394, 44718452KS_11_f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234951

>>9234944

>> No.9234957

>>9234929

black

>> No.9234960

>>9233934
wrong thread negro

>> No.9234974
File: 22 KB, 290x370, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234974

c/n the jacket ?
Is it better in olive ?

>> No.9234983
File: 312 KB, 480x336, paome_fc743d90-057d-0132-2ea7-5e6ca630c8f5place_GpKUXoeRQ5uaEh83ApHh_1920px-DaleEarnhardtSunglassesDriversSuit_large[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9234983

>> No.9235015
File: 148 KB, 940x1316, 1411168423296.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235015

>>9234944
its basically this...

>> No.9235022
File: 98 KB, 500x745, 1416798187853.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235022

>>9234951
>>9235015
vs. this

>> No.9235027

>>9234974
bump
pls

>> No.9235041

>>9234957
you're going to look like a greaser.

which is not necessarily bad.

if the jeans are indigo i think a brown leather jacket will always look better though.

the point was you're going to want more than one jacket, don't even try to cover all bases with one purchase.

>> No.9235048

>>9234974
n its shit in both

>> No.9235054

>>9235022
Choosing this one, thanks :^)

>> No.9235167
File: 577 KB, 600x1422, coppernaut.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235167

Pick 2, /fa/.

Leaning towards #1 and #4.

>> No.9235181

>>9235167
#2 is dope !

>> No.9235184
File: 313 KB, 1280x853, adidas-originals-c-10-collection-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235184

cop?

>> No.9235197

>>9235181
What do you think about #4?

>> No.9235216
File: 123 KB, 1000x1000, Nike Air Max 90s Ice QS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235216

:^)

>> No.9235218

>>9235197
p good too, but toecap is weird

>> No.9235254

>>9234960
fine brah

>> No.9235311
File: 46 KB, 440x481, ss+(2014-12-22+at+08.19.25).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235311

>>9235167
1 or 2 def
>>9235184
n
>>9235216
if you're black

copperknot?

>> No.9235320

>>9235311
cop the left pair, not the right pair

>> No.9235325
File: 8 KB, 450x450, 503697541_product_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235325

cop?

>> No.9235340
File: 10 KB, 236x354, 0494570c0bcc8b0f2ba9bd4ced655b8b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235340

c/n?

>> No.9235356

>>9235340
c

>> No.9235367

>>9235340
bunny shoes lol. DNc

>> No.9235392

>>9235197
fuckin gay

>> No.9235418

>>9235320
Why not the right pair?

>> No.9235420

>>9235418
the fade looks stupid

>> No.9235432

>>9235392
Why gay, man?

>> No.9235461
File: 21 KB, 446x522, hmprod (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235461

Drapey sweater thing from H&M. C/n?

>> No.9235464

>>9235418
indigo is for dads

>> No.9235530
File: 25 KB, 250x250, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235530

Black or white raf velcros? I found some fake ones should I cop?

>> No.9235535
File: 29 KB, 525x625, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235535

cop or not? want gats, kinda like these svensson ones better than mmm

>> No.9235544

>>9235535
cop, the svensson ones look nicer too imo

>> No.9235552

>>9235530
>I found some fake ones should I cop?
dnfc

>> No.9235591

>>9235535
What should I look for when buying GATs? Can I just go on ebay.de (europefag) and buy a pair for like 30 euro? Which designers does them best?

>> No.9235601

>>9234256
They are great albeit boring. Get Stans and doper reeboks

>> No.9235645

>>9235591

you can either get designer ones, like MMM and Svensson, for around $300

or you can go for the actual GATs that cost like $30 in Germany. They usually retail for around $60 in the US off online proxies. check grailed for them

>> No.9235775
File: 306 KB, 532x747, Screen Shot 2014-12-22 at 1.46.43 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235775

Postman oxfords of chukkas? I'm having a tough time deciding.

>> No.9235783

>>9235775
Def oxfords

>> No.9235812

Should I? this is the back.

>> No.9235823
File: 320 KB, 522x629, 9764689f69a086b031fb8d146fd11592.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235823

>>9235812
fml.

>> No.9235829

>>9235775
If you want oxfords, I'm selling some ATM

>> No.9235841

>>9235823
Ehhhh, I wouldnt recommend it unless you've been to those places. I wear shit with names of cities ive never been to, but im well aware its lame as fuck.

Be prepared to have the rest of your outfit carry the shit out of that busy-ass sweater.

>> No.9235898

>>9235829
I doubt I share your size - I have the feet of a giant w/out the peen to match. (13 US)

>> No.9235902
File: 91 KB, 579x658, Industrie Cambridge vs Seine.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9235902

Boots for going out to bars, wearing with jeans, looking sharp. Which pair will make girls like me more?

>> No.9235908

>>9235898
They're a size 12, but they run big. I'm usually a 11.5 and they are huge on me.

>> No.9235915

>>9235902
girls dont work like that

>> No.9235954

>>9235461
would look great without the pockets

n

>> No.9235963

>>9235902
those both look terrible, boots are not attractive to most girls unless you are trying to attract middle aged women

>> No.9236008

>>9235908
want to shoot me a link to a listing? I'm probably going to swing by a redwing shop sometime in the next few days to try a few pairs on. If a 12 ends up working out its safe to assume I'd be glad to buy them from you.

>> No.9236274

>>9235535
that's not a bad-looking shoe either but prefer the MMM version.

i don't know why Svensson decided to go with the CP-style sole. actually it looks like the exact same sole that CPs and a bunch of other designer sneakers have. makes them all look samey.

>> No.9236473
File: 564 KB, 1944x1944, IMG_20141221_140516.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9236473

>>9231339
I own that exact shirt and got it from aeropostle

>> No.9236649

>>9236008
What's your email? I haven't put one up yet but i will in a few hours when I get home and I'll give the link

>> No.9237091

>>9235552
why not? the pics shown look good

>> No.9237382
File: 51 KB, 975x1463, 31896087_001_d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237382

cop or not

>> No.9237401
File: 207 KB, 1023x683, DSC_7438-2_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237401

I need some grey or all white sneakers. Should I cop these for 65€?

>> No.9237408
File: 101 KB, 975x1463, nut.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237408

I don't think I'm gonna cop, but can anyone recommend something similar?

>> No.9237434

>>9236473
>that exact shirt
>posts fit of different shirt

Are you retarded?

>> No.9237460

>>9237401
def cop

>> No.9237681
File: 37 KB, 500x375, $T2eC16RHJF0FFZ-i8hILBR4nssmUk!~~60_12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237681

>> No.9237725

>>9233960
Any more opinions?
Still debating on copping. Just hesitant for 60 USD...

>> No.9237765
File: 134 KB, 1095x1461, Stanley-Tall-Lace-Boot (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237765

>>9233481
I like em, but postmans would be a better shoe for minimal fits
>>9233527
cop
>>9233671
na
>>9235902
Neither, but of the two, the top pair is less offensive
>>9237382
cop

I can get these boots for $290. C/N, and if so, will black shoe polish work to even out/darken the leather?

http://www.johnvarvatos.com/stanley-tall-lace-boot/F2544Q3-Y778C.html

>> No.9237785 [DELETED] 
File: 342 KB, 2000x1747, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237785

>>9237765
Cop that

>> No.9237790 [DELETED] 
File: 12 KB, 234x250, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237790

>>9237681
Cop that

>> No.9237797 [DELETED] 
File: 15 KB, 245x250, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237797

>>9233960
Cop that

>> No.9237806

>>9231494
Where is it from?

>> No.9237809

>>9237785
>>9237790
>>9237797
Bitch, you guessed it!
You was right

>> No.9237820

>>9234855
cop. KVA zipper-backs are v underrated. far better than the multi-laces

>> No.9237833

>>9237091
The replicas look pretty similar to the real ones. If you can justify paying $150+ for sweatshop shoes that will age poorly then cop. The real ones arent THAT expensive. Not as good as they used to be though.

>> No.9237850

>>9232694
thrift shops

>> No.9237871

>>9237833
I see thanks for the info M9

>> No.9237890

>>9234183

I did actually!

Should be here by christmas.

>> No.9237892 [DELETED] 
File: 44 KB, 600x318, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237892

>>9237408
Cop that

>> No.9237902

>>9237809
IM STIIIILL WITH MY NIGGAS

>> No.9237910

>>9231557
where to cop

>> No.9237919

>>9237902
AND WE FLEXIN

>> No.9237939
File: 101 KB, 480x640, somedude.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237939

cop ?

>> No.9237947

>>9237939
girl or boy?

>> No.9237960

>>9237939

cute

>> No.9237967 [DELETED] 
File: 357 KB, 1854x1746, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237967

>>9237939
Cop that

>> No.9237984

>>9237967
I see you've found the new meme that's sweeping the nation

>> No.9237994
File: 75 KB, 218x260, 218px-Tumblr_nffa9rESCQ1qmyvaqo5_400.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9237994

>>9237939
>>9237967
>mfw

>> No.9238360
File: 27 KB, 450x600, 93ce96134fe68f4102ec20d26932009e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9238360

Black Comme des Garçons cropped pants.
Cop or not?

>> No.9238363
File: 132 KB, 870x1110, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9238363

repost

>> No.9238401

>>9235015
w2c sweater

>> No.9238410

>>9233960
Still debating everyone
So far you've said cop but I'm hesitant because poorfag life

What do you think? Should I go for it? I really fuckin' like it

>> No.9238608
File: 206 KB, 2000x2000, S84402_01_standard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9238608

im like 3:1 for and against rn

plz help

>> No.9238864
File: 82 KB, 710x752, mixed-yarn-beanie-bn44002-029-forest-huf-beanie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9238864

Cop oder nicht?

>> No.9238868

>>9238363
still looks like a trashbag with horrible fake fur attached to it

>> No.9238871

>>9238608
if you can get all black or black with a white sole go for that imo. ur pic is acceptable but there's better colourways i think

>> No.9238879

>>9238608
y

>> No.9238881

>>9237967
>>>reddit

>> No.9239008
File: 139 KB, 1000x1332, acne_face.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239008

is this gud or the face is too much ?

>> No.9239011

>>9239008
:|

>> No.9239019
File: 31 KB, 460x480, acne-studios-black-smiley-face-patent-leather-pumps-product-1-21742338-2-619511411-normal_large_flex.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239019

>>9239008
It's a lot subtler than some of the other uses of that motif.

>> No.9239033

>>9238864
If you're a white grill who smoked weed once then cop. If not, find one without a label.

>> No.9239053

>>9239019
hey, why don't you like platform heels?

shits popular with most women and the sole of the shoe has a more attractive appearance, rather than a steep rake of a shoe like that

>> No.9239069

>>9239053
I have and wear a lot of platform shoes. I just don't like them on shorter heels (under 4"). It looks kind of pathetic in a "I can't walk in shoes this tall" way.

>> No.9239074

>>9231053
yeah dude. innevas are sick.

>>9231151
that sole really is whack imo. I suppose theyre quite nice though, although i dont think they would look good with vety many outfits

>>9231521
dont like these

>>9232864
prettty nice

>>9235461
no

>>9235535
yeah these are very nice, ive always liked those more than any other gat style. I have some of the svensson chukkas but these are way nicer. The suede on mine is really good though and the leather lining is nice, those will probably go on sale so get em then or atleast wait and see. I got mine for £80 or something down from like £230 and all the styles were reduced that much i think. That was in 2012 though lol.

>> No.9239092

>>9239069
oh its a skill oriented thing?

I prefer the silhouette of platform shoe for the 99 out of 100 women who refuse to spend more than $300 on a pair of shoes

the knock off cheap shoes tend to look really bad

the suede platform heels all these bitches are wearing to clubs looks better than the louboutin knockoffs fucking places like aldo sell

like the HALP ME DRESS MYSELF types, will by something they think kind of sort of looks like the piece you showed them from forever 21 or Nordstrom or some trashy store

>> No.9239093
File: 50 KB, 722x917, vans_sk8-hi_navy_vn-0_d5ivy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239093

shall I cop for only £27?

>> No.9239098
File: 1.28 MB, 1139x666, Bildschirmfoto 2014-12-23 um 17.15.17.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239098

>>9239092
Nordstrom is not a trashy store. Take that back.

>> No.9239113

>>9239098
macy's*

>> No.9239137

>>9239093
cop it it's a classic man

I would get the black with burgundy

>> No.9239155

>>9239093
Cop. Where for 27 pounds tho?

>> No.9239164

>>9239155
I website called the Idle Man, if you spend an extra 2.50 you get free delivery!

>> No.9239187

>>9239098
Nordstrom is taking over the Sears spot @ the Eaton Center in TO? Crazy.

>> No.9239312

>>9239093
Cop.

>> No.9239409
File: 127 KB, 1032x812, 32627.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239409

>> No.9239412

>>9239409
c
n

>> No.9239415
File: 29 KB, 290x370, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239415

the jacket

>> No.9239417
File: 878 KB, 1058x1406, derb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239417

cup
or nor

>> No.9239426

>>9239415
going to have to say no

>> No.9239448

>>9239426

y?

just curious

>> No.9239458

>>9239417
that contrast stitching is repulsive

>> No.9239461

>>9239448
It looks really busy and a little cheap somehow. It does remind me of a cheap barbour though, if you like it you should cop

>> No.9239464

>>9239417

>navy shoes

what u gonna wear these with? u better not reply blue or black jeans

>> No.9239504

>>9239464
I would wear black jeans with them, don't see why that would be a bad idea at all.
Wool/grey trousers too. Not a fan of bright trousers so that's about it

>> No.9239506

>>9239464
stop posting
you know nothing about color schemes

>> No.9239519

>>9239506

its basic knowledge nvy and black look grose togerher. but if u want to be avantgarde by all means go ahead.

>> No.9239520

>>9239412

so C or N

>> No.9239529

>>9239520
not, unfortunately
how much are they? im sure you could find much better for the price

>> No.9239538

>>9239529

250, kinda steep for me but im open to suggestions

>> No.9239553

>>9239538
what the fuck. are you serious? i hope you mean dollars and not pounds, even then 250 for those is ridiculous

>> No.9239560

>>9239519
I don't know where you heard that, probably from another 6-month-old /fa/shionisto. You don't know shit about fashion. Stop posting.

>> No.9239592

>>9239417
cop

>> No.9239737
File: 178 KB, 1000x900, 078464.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239737

what do u think

$61+$18 shipping, its on sale

>> No.9239816

>>9239737
ugly af

>> No.9239831

>>9239816
do u really think so

>> No.9239871

>>9239831
yup just being honest, I don't like the color scheme at all and that model of tigers are pretty meh too

>> No.9239883

>>9239871
oh okay, gotcha. i really dig the colorado 85's myself.

>> No.9239885

>>9235823
w2c?

>> No.9239907
File: 3.64 MB, 2522x1000, pa.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9239907

Can't tell if I like em, or not.
They seem pretty chill, and they're 60 $.

>> No.9239982

>>9239907
i like 'm

>> No.9239991

>>9237681
bump this

>> No.9239993

>>9239991
sure, can't go wrong with these

>> No.9240112
File: 133 KB, 930x930, 39410-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9240112

Anyone have any experience with Spalwarts? I'm a bit put off by the sole.

>> No.9240115

>>9239907
fake stan smiths

>> No.9240590
File: 203 KB, 600x400, blog_doc_04.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9240590

Doc Martens Steed Made in England

>> No.9240800
File: 127 KB, 1246x1076, jacket.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9240800

Its a Large Female jacket, but im a dude.
I wear medium though and the dimensions fit me.

should I cop????

>> No.9240898

>>9240800
>
COP BABY

>> No.9240910

>>9240112
the sole is most of the appeal

>> No.9240944
File: 55 KB, 960x546, m574skw_nb_14_i.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9240944

c/n ?

>> No.9240950
File: 88 KB, 650x650, 12119_90ba9c5a61-n45-02107021-21-big.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9240950

Was looking through jumpers when i found this. Looks hairy but would look good with a twill shirt and some diesel belter jeans?

>> No.9240959
File: 67 KB, 650x650, 12119_11f98e8068-new-navy-front-big.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9240959

>>9240944
Definitely Cop
>>9240950
in fact navy seems like a better colour

>> No.9240971

>>9240959
colorway is dope enough for the 574's?

>> No.9240986
File: 529 KB, 1027x1500, 70642.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9240986

>>9240971
Definitely dope. What about these?

>> No.9241006

>>9240986
wanting a black sneaker mainly
those are fucking pretty tho
assuming ur >>9240959 , cop the navy one

>> No.9241236
File: 283 KB, 1128x2000, coppanutz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9241236

Yea or nah

>> No.9241289

>>9241236
Not, but I think its dependant on what you would wear with them

>> No.9241459

>>9241289

Mainly black skinnies, black joggers, or dark denim. I'm waffling between these, black leather slip ons, and some black+white CPs.

>> No.9241866
File: 40 KB, 483x541, superman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9241866

>>9230028
This is around 50 usd c/n?