[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 63 KB, 800x500, 1388782839711.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9165381 No.9165381 [Reply] [Original]

cop or not copornot coppernot copperknot coppernaut

>> No.9165491
File: 868 KB, 1600x1878, 0237398001_0_6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9165491

>>9165381
just saw on cos. what's to be said about cos quality? probably wont be brilliant but im sure it's better than it's father h&m

>> No.9165499

>>9165491
Just cop it already

>> No.9165514

>>9165491
>muh speckles

>> No.9165535
File: 157 KB, 407x400, Screen Shot 2014-12-03 at 22.05.38.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9165535

DO I

>> No.9165559

>>9165535
Looks good
don't cop if it's too expensive though

>> No.9165564

http://www.acnestudios.com/charles-black.html

cop or not?

>> No.9165571

>>9165535
Thanks, £175 which I'm happy to pay as it's heavily discounted. Not sure if the dollar signs seemed way too tacky though.

>> No.9165578

>>9165571
>>9165559

damn meant to reply to this one

>> No.9165583

>>9165564
feeling acne clothes in person they've actually got some pretty alright quality, not sure why recently people here are claiming it's shit. But is it worth £800? Don't think so m8. That's a nice coat but you should look around before you drop nearly 1k on a coat from a mid-range brand

>> No.9165642

>>9165514
you just ordered an our legacy shirt from the us right? have you ordered from there before? how much were you fucked by customs into britain, little grey riding hood?

>> No.9165655
File: 29 KB, 290x370, image1xl[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9165655

>>9165491
>>9165535
both alright


the cardigan

>> No.9165672

>>9165655
dnc
looks thin in a bad way, almost sheer. what do you plan on pairing it with?

>> No.9165675

>>9165583
tried it in person, cashmere wool pretty nice and fits decent too, but yeah its a lot.

what would you recommend instead?

>> No.9165767
File: 1.91 MB, 2186x920, cop or not.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9165767

Will be pairing with these

http://image1.superdry.com/static/images/products/upload4518467452077918977.jpg

>> No.9165772

>>9165767
nah

>> No.9165789
File: 158 KB, 1024x1304, red.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9165789

cough ornoth

>> No.9165794

>>9165789
are you going to be a clown? horrible yellow

>> No.9165808

>>9165794
i'm planning on getting dark brown laces though.

>> No.9165814

think the sole is too exaggerated? looks a bit gay

>> No.9165818

>>9165808
too red for brown. go black if you do

>> No.9165957

>>9165789
like the colour but they look a bit wrecked

>> No.9165959
File: 76 KB, 700x700, 8892456304670.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9165959

This or black?

>> No.9165987

>>9165959
that

>> No.9165994

>>9165959
Ew. Picksomething else. This looks like shit and has obnoxious branding

>> No.9166002

>>9165994
im planning on removing the tag somehow.

>> No.9166022

>>9166002
in that case you might as well gat a rains anorak or something

>> No.9166092
File: 101 KB, 669x600, 20443.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9166092

>> No.9166105
File: 27 KB, 332x515, copornot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9166105

I tried these on in the store and thought it looked great (my legs are way more aesthetic in the pants than the model).

Only problem is that I'm white and they're fake leather. I have plenty of outfits to go with them, I'm just wondering if it looks too shit to rock.

>> No.9166182

>>9166022
Don't really like the rubbery plastic look on those.

>> No.9166223

>>9166182
i assume you're replying to >>9166105?

Yeh, they look pretty shiny in the pic, but they werent anywhere near that shiny or plastic-looking in-store. I was just wondering if faux leather in general looked shitty if the rest of my attire isnt swagfagged out.

>> No.9166230
File: 103 KB, 600x920, _9792706[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9166230

Is it worth $100?

>> No.9166232

>>9166230
looks like it has too many pockets for my taste

>> No.9166245
File: 156 KB, 1019x1384, 64I03JNAV_large[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9166245

>>9166232
Here's how it looks when buttoned (navy, but same parka).

>> No.9166259

>>9166245
Still not feeling the pockets or buttons, but that's just nitpicking.

I'm also jewish as fuck, so I wouldn't spend $100 on it, but if its cool to you then I'd go for it

>> No.9166270

>>9166230
looks alright

>> No.9166277

>>9166092
da fuqq is that?

>> No.9166283

>>9166092
no

>> No.9166288

>>9166105
aesthetic is not an adjective, idiot.

>> No.9166291

>>9166288
aes·thet·ic
esˈTHedik/
adjective
1. concerned with beauty or the appreciation of beauty.
"the pictures give great aesthetic pleasure"

>> No.9166299
File: 20 KB, 415x405, 77777.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9166299

>> No.9166304

>>9166299
under no circumstances

>> No.9166311

>>9166291
it doesnt mean pretty or good looking though, the way >>9166105 was using

>> No.9166312

>>9166304
w-why

>> No.9166316

>>9166312
>>9166299
C H A V
H
A
V

>> No.9166319

>>9166311
Yeah I realize that, but it is an adjective.

>> No.9166322

>>9166316
this would be the only adidas item i own

>> No.9166346
File: 610 KB, 1740x1060, copper.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9166346

>> No.9166379

>>9166346
looks good
id say cop

>> No.9166404
File: 80 KB, 1200x1157, $_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9166404

>>9165381

>> No.9166423
File: 343 KB, 1141x1600, $_57-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9166423

>>9165381

>> No.9166434

>>9166404
issey? is aite
>>9166423
yes

>> No.9166611

>>9166423
cop dat

>> No.9166777

fur is removable
it will probably be ~£200

>> No.9166780
File: 115 KB, 667x900, B9M8z3wH_wQ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9166780

>>9166777
nice trips

>> No.9166781

>>9166780
lmfao is that reagan on the arm

>> No.9166784

>>9166781
yee

>> No.9166821
File: 393 KB, 1154x1500, A1vnfR1YbuL._SL1500_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9166821

yes or no

>> No.9166822

>>9166821
god no

>> No.9166824

>>9166822

So what you really mean is yes, yes?

>> No.9166832

>>9166824
yes means no

>> No.9166837

>>9166832

So a double negative, it's a yes.

>> No.9166842

>>9166837
yes, yes.

:^)

>> No.9166844

>>9166230
w2c?

>> No.9166884

>>9165535
w2c?

>> No.9166969
File: 25 KB, 640x480, DSC00646.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9166969

cop or not? theyre in dece condition for 09 dunks

>> No.9166983

>>9166969
depends on price

>> No.9166989
File: 201 KB, 1450x1015, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9166989

crop kernauh

>> No.9166994

>>9166983
its reasonable :/

nothing ridiculous

>> No.9167004
File: 66 KB, 1000x1000, 24-09-2014_maisonmartinmargiela_22redsolereplicasneaker_white.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9167004

>> No.9167005

>>9167004
fuck no

>> No.9167008

>>9166989
toms are pretty lame

>> No.9167009
File: 14 KB, 614x296, common-projects-achilles-blog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9167009

I finally saved 400, do I go for it?

>> No.9167011

>>9167009
Wait until Christmas sales. Don't pay full price for CPs

>> No.9167013

>>9167004
If you can find that with a gum sole and white laces that would be dope

>> No.9167028

>>9166994
if it's a reasonable price, I'd say they look good, the zippers look intact and the soles don't look blown out. I'd say cop, geos can be a great addition to an appropriate wardrobe.

>> No.9167403
File: 178 KB, 750x1125, ugly cunt wearing northface.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9167403

y/n ? can get it for $180

>> No.9167405

>>9166844
topman :))

http://us.topman.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?beginIndex=0&viewAllFlag=&catalogId=33059&storeId=13051&productId=16368410&langId=-1&categoryId=&parent_category_rn=&searchTerm=64I02JKHA&resultCount=1&geoip=home

>> No.9167766
File: 261 KB, 1920x2379, 6861355710_2_1_1 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9167766

the jacket

>> No.9167778

>>9167009
>Spending $400 on CP's
Wait for a sale or cop second hand

>> No.9167788
File: 47 KB, 1184x519, 2014-12-04_02.42.25.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9167788

Which one, /fa/?

>> No.9167798

>>9167778
>being this much of a poorfag

>> No.9167801

>>9167788
doc martens a shit

right 100%

>> No.9167803

>>9167009
Dude I paid £80 for a pair of suede CP's never buy them at retail price.

>> No.9167806

>>9167403
Absolutely haram

>> No.9167812

>>9167798
>Being this much of a trust fund baby

Why pay $400 when you can cop for $200 in sales

>> No.9167829

>>9167766
w2c dude?
looks sick

>> No.9167868
File: 262 KB, 1600x1200, $_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9167868

i dont even play consoles

>> No.9167882
File: 164 KB, 1024x1024, RC3207-1HGrey-003_1024x1024[1].jpg_v=140849.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9167882

yes/no?

http://shop.reigningchamp.com/collections/fall-winter-2014/products/crew-neck-heather-grey

>> No.9167890

>>9167829
Pique jacket with contrast piping at Zara(Yeah I know, I still think it looks good).

>> No.9167982
File: 518 KB, 1500x2000, carhartt-sweatshirt-mit-brusttasche-mittelgrau-meliert_9074399,989db4,1500xf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9167982

>> No.9167986

>>9166105
Fuck off American Apparel Tumblr fag cunt I cannot stand people who use 'aesthetic' in this context.

>> No.9167995

>>9165767
so nasty
>>9165789
probably end up looking autistic but could pull it off but the rest of your attire would have to be built around them
>>9165959
i´d go for this, looks good, can´t really go wrong
>>9166092
probably pretty hard to pull off but not impossible, make sure you have a wardrobe that fits with them
>>9166230
normally green parks are pretty done but the wool is niceee, i´d cop
>>9166245
can´t really go wrong, really played out doe

>> No.9167998

>>9167982
nah, don't like the pattern on the pocket, but i guess cop if you do

>>9167882
no reason not to

>>9167868
stored in a damp garage / 10

>>9167788
left if you have to

>>9167766
no

>>9167403
awful

>>9167009
yeah

>>9167004
not keen on the red sole but great shoes

>>9166989
nah

>>9166969
nah

>> No.9168144

>>9165564
Pls help, or recommend a good coat?

>> No.9168210
File: 309 KB, 1000x1000, 05-11-2014_norseprojects_antonnoisemelangeshirt_charcoalmelange_1_bm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9168210

Really love this Norse Projects shirt, but £120 is a lot for me as a student. Still, I'm tempted.

>> No.9168221
File: 352 KB, 384x601, Schermafbeelding 2014-12-02 om 23.25.42.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9168221

Y/N?

Would wear it with some Stan Smiths Navy colourway

>> No.9168289

>>9165381
>no qt cop gf

._.

>> No.9168339

>>9168210
You'll make back the money fast, and if you regret it. Sell. But definitely cop that shirt

>> No.9168363

>>9168221
If I were you I'd get something thats not double-breasted

>> No.9168370

>>9168210
You're really gonna spend $120 on a shirt bruh

>> No.9168376

>>9168221
go to the overcoat thread friend

>> No.9168388

>>9168210
I'm debating on getting this too but it's sorta expensive. Just pray for a sale

>> No.9168422

>>9168370
£120 is probably closer to $200

>> No.9168424

>>9168388

Yeah, that's what I'm hoping for. Issue is, its selling out in medium, worried that I won't be able to get one if I don't cop it soon

>> No.9168430

>>9168424
Mfw that exact same feel. I would wait though

>> No.9168550
File: 397 KB, 934x596, silentnightdeadlynightsweat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9168550

>> No.9168857
File: 65 KB, 800x800, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9168857

c/n?

>> No.9168861
File: 98 KB, 768x1280, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9168861

>>9168857
Would appreciate help deciding between that one and this

>> No.9168867

>>9166404
wont to cop. what are they?

>> No.9169165
File: 65 KB, 278x171, ukryujbt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9169165

>>9166092
is that a fake Palladium?

Real Palladiums are decent though

>> No.9169932
File: 769 KB, 1450x967, DSC00333.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9169932

cop or nah? Palladium x alpha industries ma-1

>> No.9170013
File: 536 KB, 1481x1481, UPWOOD_28_RG[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170013

cop or not?

>> No.9170059

>>9169165
no they're not

i actually had to walk through a tjmaxx oneday

and saw a rack full of them

i was suprised /fa/ shat themselves over those boots

they have this werd fold out convertable feature

made of shit tier cotton duck cloth

and had p much converse sole

>> No.9170203
File: 233 KB, 914x961, 2014-12-04 16.47.54.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170203

cop or not?

>> No.9170251

>>9165381
COPPERNAUGHT

>> No.9170278

>>9170203
def cop
fav jacket i own

>> No.9170284

>>9169932
fuck yeah cop

>> No.9170287

>>9170278
what is your height and what size did you get?

>> No.9170289

>>9168857
get this one

>> No.9170302

>>9170287
6'3, I wear a large
fits big, a lot of people say to size down but it looks better when it's a bit bigger imo

>> No.9170329

>>9165959
link pls? can't find on website and reverse image search didn't help

>> No.9170340

>>9168210
not at full price, espesh if you're struggling for moolah
w8 til after xmas

>>9168550
no

>>9168857
>>9168861
neither

>>9169932
nah

>>9170013
nah

>>9170203
generic anorak

>> No.9170345

>>9170340
it's a ecwcs not an anorak are you blind
ecwcs is the god damn name of the jacket

>> No.9170353
File: 658 KB, 2000x1000, preto1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170353

Cop or not? Jacquard patch on the back etc

>> No.9170376
File: 98 KB, 472x352, tumblr_ner8sohMGl1s5tlmxo1_500.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170376

>>9170345
oh shit you got me it's not a boring black anorak

>> No.9170389
File: 1.32 MB, 1000x1000, Tellason_Coverall_Orange_Front_c8fc8802-b27d-4b5f-91f5-4cefd35d3993_1024x1024.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170389

yea/nay?

>> No.9170400

>>9170389
awful stock pic lmao

i wouldn't cop

>> No.9170427
File: 332 KB, 1200x1200, erik_schedin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170427

$214, should I?

>> No.9170439

>>9170427
no

>> No.9170450

>>9170439
why not?

>> No.9170458

>>9170289
thx bb
>>9170340
>neither
why

>> No.9170459

>>9170450
not worth the price, there's better simple white shoes for much cheaper

>> No.9170464

>>9170345
Getting this mad over a tent-sized meme shitty quality jacket, damn.
MC Ride is dead, get over it.

>> No.9170469

>>9170329
http://shop.carhartt-wip.com/view/us/men/jackets/I003082/nimbus-pullover

>> No.9170476
File: 91 KB, 929x603, 61Ft9bdlB9L._UX466_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170476

should i cop either of them?

>> No.9170482

>>9170464
you know ecwcs is a style of jacket and not just made by alpha industries right
it's like a bomber or a parka

>> No.9170483

>>9170345
>ecwcs is the god damn name of the jacket
except it's not

>> No.9170486

>>9170482
Who are you trying to convince here pal.

>> No.9170488

>>9170476
yeah, get a nice fedora to match

>> No.9170495

>>9170486
damn you replied fast
I don't really have to convince you because it's true m8

>> No.9170497

>>9170488
any reccs bruh?

>> No.9170501

>>9170459
like what? i haven't seen a cheaper white leather shoe. erik schedin is supposed to be really good quality too

>> No.9170508

>>9170483
I meant to say "ecwcs is in the god damn name"
my bad bb

>> No.9170512
File: 912 KB, 1400x1081, faux-leather-fedora.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170512

>>9170497
get a leather one

>> No.9170522
File: 16 KB, 382x410, a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170522

?

>> No.9170533
File: 6 KB, 184x184, 1415895920659.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170533

>>9170469

>> No.9170535

>>9170522
dnc

>> No.9170540

Cheap monday jeans for 75$? seems a bit expensive. anyone have experience/ can vouch for quality?

>> No.9170543

>>9170540
my fav pair of jeans are cm

>> No.9170569
File: 101 KB, 975x1463, dunce.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170569

http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?id=34224337&parentid=SALE_M#/

I normally avoid graphic tees like the plague but this seems passable

>> No.9170573

>>9165994
How is that obnoxious you mouthbreather

>> No.9170590

>>9170535
y

>> No.9170594
File: 151 KB, 2000x2000, aaa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170594

y/n

>> No.9170601

>>9170353
any opinions?

>> No.9170611
File: 35 KB, 466x554, 61+sGpON6IL._UX466_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170611

is it possible to remove the epaulets without it looking like shit?

>> No.9170626

>>9170611
the whole thing is shit so just dont cop at all

>> No.9170638

>>9170594
cable knits are for women

>> No.9170646
File: 28 KB, 570x456, il_570xN.678020855_9rsb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170646

???

>> No.9170652

>>9170646
dnc unless you're a fruit

>> No.9170662

>>9170522
any1

>> No.9170674

>>9170590
ugly branding, get a blank one

>> No.9170679

>>9170652
I'm a strawberry

>> No.9170682

>>9170646
unless youre black or a tall skinny white guy whos trying to impress lame hipster girls who wear huff socks and talk too much about how their cat is bae do not cop

>> No.9170685
File: 33 KB, 394x400, throw up.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170685

>>9170682
>talk too much about how their cat is bae

>> No.9170695

>>9170646

w2c?

>> No.9170733

>>9170594
y
w2c

>> No.9170734

>>9170679
in that case defo cop mah kiwi

>> No.9170741

>>9170733
read the tag. it says uniqlo

>> No.9170921
File: 101 KB, 1000x1000, 0-item_pic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170921

Looking for a matches-everything sneaker.

Would this go well with black skinny jeans, khaki chinos, and/or grey tricolor dropcrotch trackpants?

The reason being that I live in China at the moment so I can only find like 3 shoes that fit me.

>> No.9170948

>>9170695
90's nautica jacket. Probably from some art kid tumblr shop like stackaways

>> No.9170977
File: 40 KB, 620x413, kris-van-assche-2010-ss-footwear-accessories-1.jpg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9170977

Anyone know what the quality is like on these, and if they're worth the price? (~$600)

>> No.9170983

>>9170977
DO NOT COP RETAIL
pay 400 or so max

>> No.9171073
File: 16 KB, 368x475, pigalle_sweat-rm[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9171073

155 USD

>> No.9171687
File: 45 KB, 640x480, IMG_0937[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9171687

I have a chance of copping bundeswehr GATs for a very low price. How is the sizing on them?

I'm an 11,5 in vans authentics and CDB's. Should I get the 290 (EU45,5) or the 295 (EU46). I'm leaning towards the 46 as I already have a pair of adidas samba's in 45 1/3th and they're a bit on the small side.

>> No.9171698

>>9171687
Poorfags gon poor.

>> No.9171800
File: 806 KB, 1500x1500, cassavetes-open-black-rinse.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9171800

Cop or knot?

>> No.9171849
File: 208 KB, 900x1130, bonnet-merinos-gris-norse-projects-gris-laine-bonnets-180552_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9171849

For winter.
Can't decide color though.

>> No.9171857

>>9171687
I have BW GATs and I wear EU45-46, I'd go with 45.5, since they're a bit too loose at BW 300 for me.

>> No.9171902

>>9171687
better size up with gats
i wear 42.5-43 in most shoes, and gats in 275 are a bit too small

>> No.9172058
File: 544 KB, 1920x1440, 2964217-5-4x[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9172058

yes, no?

>> No.9172081
File: 658 KB, 1024x682, Saucony x Bodega Shadow 6000 Sweater Grey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9172081

Should I?

>> No.9172095

>>9172058
no, zipper is shit

>> No.9172104
File: 25 KB, 480x360, 2964226-5-MULTIVIEW[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9172104

>>9172095
this?

>> No.9172107
File: 121 KB, 1200x1200, 073-3012-026_zoom1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9172107

are firebirds /fa/?

>> No.9172110
File: 349 KB, 1500x1106, adidas-casual-airliner-bag-black-1150.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9172110

Yes or nope ?
Does it go well with long coats ?

>> No.9172113

>>9172107
only if you are slavic... and live in eastern europe.

>> No.9172117

>>9170340
>>>9170013
>nah
why not?

>> No.9172130

>>9166230

I just bought this, I think its dope but I agree it is a bit played out. The inner lining is definitely the unique part tho. I would recommend

>> No.9172150
File: 483 KB, 1200x1200, B50-0023-192_zoom1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9172150

should I?

>> No.9172169
File: 730 KB, 2592x1044, ML003D-5-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9172169

Which one? They all from All Saints.
Or you can tell me All Saints is shit and recommend me similar jackets at the same price range.

>> No.9172174

>>9172169
mid

>> No.9172245

>>9172150
nah

>> No.9172274
File: 44 KB, 473x464, fdsagdfsg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9172274

Safe enough?

>> No.9172282

>>9172169
All Saints is shit, the price range they sell their garbage in is pretty high so you should have no difficulty finding jackets. Use shopstyle or something ffs.

>> No.9172286
File: 130 KB, 484x668, Coats.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9172286

Which one to cop?

>> No.9172291

>>9172274
Fold down boots are trash

>> No.9172292
File: 56 KB, 275x341, ss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9172292

cope?

>> No.9172294

>>9172292
Cop!

>> No.9172339

>>9170540
Are you a hungry skellington?

>> No.9172345
File: 929 KB, 1104x1600, VR-Camisa-VR-Color-Roxa-1044-5560161-1-zoom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9172345

meh?

>> No.9172346

>>9172286
COLOR SCHEMES

>> No.9172350

>>9172339
6'3" 166 lbs

>> No.9172362
File: 61 KB, 838x568, $_57 (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9172362

Please help

>> No.9172384

>>9172282
Most of the stuff in shopstyle are ASOS tier garbage I doubt they'd be better than All Saints.

>> No.9172389

>>9172362
I think these are sick. cop imo

>> No.9172400

http://www.acnestudios.com/charles-black.html

copperknaut? or recommend other coats?

>> No.9172405

>>9172400
The price is disgusting.

Acne tries too hard.

>> No.9172407

>>9172282
Can you name me some brands?

>> No.9172497

>>9172362

pretty cool

>> No.9172672

>>9171849
>>9171849
>>9171849
>>9171849

>> No.9172949

>>9172405
well i agree, but I just got to Sweden and am gna stay here for a while and need something warm, any recs?

>> No.9172956
File: 2.07 MB, 4854x3236, Mideast-Israel-Palest_sham-30.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9172956

Visvim Fbt Shaman Folk (500 euros, my grails) OR Balenciaga Arena Noir (400 usd) + Saint Laurent black jeans (178 euros).
WHAT DO I COP?

>> No.9173058
File: 31 KB, 620x337, img58661473-620x337[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9173058

what do you think m8s? loads of different color ways to pick from

>> No.9173070
File: 16 KB, 514x514, coat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9173070

Tried it on in store, fits great

>> No.9173092 [DELETED] 
File: 431 KB, 1200x1067, IG1ivnu (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9173092

W2c hoodie on the right? I've heard it's from H&M but I can't find anything similar

>> No.9173120

>>9173070
Just copped a coat like this at goodwill, but with a collar. Looks fucking sick and I get many compliments.

>> No.9173121

>>9170522
W2C these with the grey logo?

>> No.9173137

>>9168210
seen it irl its fucking tasty. if you feel like you can spare the cash then go for it
never forego more important things for clothes tho

>> No.9173140
File: 384 KB, 2000x2664, 70636.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9173140

>orthopaedic granddad shoes
y/n
was thinking of copping the ss15 mono white rafs but i dont even want to spend much because im supposed to be copping some other shit too. but i want mono white shoes and these look pretty good

>> No.9173161

>>9173137
is it really that nice? how's the material?

>> No.9173192

>>9170594
no i bought one last year, it piled everywhere straight out the bag, it is not thick, very sheer

>> No.9173202
File: 357 KB, 639x552, Mosson_Bricke_Cupsole_Leather_High-Top_Sneaker_-_Urban_Outfitters.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9173202

cop? $80

>> No.9173209

>>9173202

Not loving the application of that super fine texture to the clean sneaker style.

>> No.9173230

>>9170594
do you really have to ask people opinions on a $30 sweater? its cheap as shit

>> No.9173242

>>9170389
if you're a tradesmen and wanna wear it for work then yeah

>> No.9173257

>>9173202
any other angles?

>> No.9173295

>>9173070
w2c?

>> No.9173381

>>9171073
anyone? I usually like some extra input before pullin the trigger above $100

>> No.9173644
File: 1.60 MB, 3264x2448, IMG_20141205_174048.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9173644

I wear semi formal attire. Chinos, khakis, etc.

Red wing ir.

>> No.9173647

>>9173644
wood cop

>> No.9173759
File: 94 KB, 975x1463, 32275950_001_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9173759

>>9173257

>> No.9173765
File: 85 KB, 975x1463, 32275950_001_f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9173765

>>9173759

>> No.9173789

>>9173140
dont get all white or all black new balance/asics/sauconys it always looks shit.

not a big fan of all leather on those types either, suede is better

>> No.9173927

>>9173759
yep cop

>> No.9173968

>>9170921
another option?

>> No.9174065
File: 309 KB, 694x528, 87078.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9174065

>>9173202
i have the white low tops and i can confidently say these aren't worth over $50 max
see if you can get them on ebay or something for less

>> No.9174317

>>9173644
Any sizing suggestions for those who own ironrangers?

>> No.9174333

>>9166346

Where's this from?

>> No.9174365

>>9173759
material feels like shit

>> No.9174370
File: 13 KB, 484x268, T1X.9uFHNgXXXXXXXX_!!0-item_pic (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9174370

>>9173968
Yeah, the standard color scheme. I don't like them as much.

>> No.9174373

>>9171073
>>9171073
>>9171073
cop or not? ',:^(

>> No.9174391

Asked this in the wrong thread.

http://www.alphaindustries.com/mens-flight-jackets/alpha-industries-ma-1-flight-jacket.htm
Cop/not cop this bomber in maroon?

>> No.9174408
File: 43 KB, 400x267, FBT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9174408

Been wanting to get FBTs for a while now but im not sure if they look to great in person. Should i go for them or just pickup some CP's instead. I know they are extremely different shoes but honestly i like them both pretty equally. Ill probably end up getting both at some point but that wont be for a while. Bit scared ill look like a total hypebeast wearing them even though I couldn't care less that some ass hole wore them.

>> No.9174440

>>9173058
I think these are horrible and gaudy.

>> No.9174446
File: 27 KB, 400x250, mcclean.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9174446

Anything similar to the Wolverine McCleans?
Slim cap toe boot?

>> No.9174460
File: 730 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_2014-12-06-00-00-41.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9174460

My mother wants to buy me a "nice everyday bag." Price limit is something like 2K I think so most dream bags by SLP and the Row are out of the question. She doesn't want to buy anything too logo-y or overdone (e.g. a monogrammed Speedy or a silver-studded Rockie) though she wants me to have something "timeless".

She suggested Proenza Schouler. Thoughts on a PS1? I know they're still popular but I don't see them much where I live and I like the shape a lot. Not sure whether I'd get a medium or large. Also considering a Mulberry Bayswater

>> No.9174474
File: 33 KB, 400x533, denimjacket.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9174474

dis

>> No.9174480

>>9174408
honestly the visvms are a way more interesting piece imo, i think itll be a lot more rewarding to have them in your wardrobe than a pair of cp's

>> No.9174497

>>9174391
Not in maroon. Navy/black/greens fine

>> No.9174715
File: 417 KB, 1879x1263, b0d3bb5e_chip_orig_16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9174715

>>9174446
Chippewa Homestead boot. They're 30% off on amazon right now.

>> No.9175391
File: 321 KB, 1034x994, Screen Shot 2014-12-06 at 16.00.36.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9175391

Acne.

Yes.

Or nay?

>> No.9175425
File: 233 KB, 1811x1340, 3864-150-20_SALVATORE_100x74.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9175425

>> No.9175428

>>9170594
I have one of these
Pretty thin but that's fine for me
Piling isn't as bad as everyone says
Does look like a cricket jacket irl

>> No.9175440

>>9175391
Prefer the lows tbh.

What site is that?

>> No.9175523
File: 64 KB, 1000x1250, $_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9175523

Not sure mane.

>> No.9175543

>>9173202
Leather looks pretty poor
>>9174408
Visvims are more interesting no doubt, make sure you can work them into outfits though. CPs are nice too.
>>9175391
Not a fan, they're shiny as fuck and kinda bulbous

>> No.9175555

>>9175523
Nah

>> No.9175664

>>9166230
just to let you know that parka is like 30~ fucking lbs

>> No.9175666

>>9175523
The Dreamcast fanboy in me says yes.
w2c?

>> No.9175672
File: 14 KB, 395x333, 41Du1fDNiNL._SX395_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9175672

Coppernaught?

>> No.9175675

>>9170646
I think I had one of these when I was in kindergarden in the 90ies.

>>9175391
No. I mean they are okay but they look like you could buy them for $5 at H&M.

>>9175425
The zipper bothers me.

>>9175523
No.

>> No.9175679
File: 169 KB, 600x600, 571514010665_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9175679

>> No.9175716

>>9175666

http://www.ebay.com/itm/331384098910?var=540567196163

Here you go, bruh.

I'm probably gonna cop for when I go full comfyguy.jpg around the house.

>> No.9175794
File: 31 KB, 450x450, original.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9175794

100$

>> No.9175801
File: 269 KB, 546x628, internationalist.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9175801

mids? lows? they're pretty cheap so I might pick up both. these are TTS right?

>> No.9175876
File: 886 KB, 938x835, qBr0C0M.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9175876

Left or right?

>> No.9175886

>>9175794
hundred bucks for that?

>> No.9175901
File: 108 KB, 471x458, 137341348585.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9175901

>>9175794
>supreme

>> No.9175911

>>9175876
Neither, but left if you must

>> No.9175985

>>9175801
lows, mids look stupid for some reason.

>> No.9175999

>>9170921
cop
>>9171073
definitely not. even if you did the regular pigalle logo is better.
>>9171800
cop cop
>>9171849
maybe, you can get the exact same from anywhere else for cheaper tho
>>9172081
lining ruins it
>>9172104
no
>>9172110
no
>>9172345
no
>>9172362
cop cop cop
>>9174408
get the fbts with the thicker sole
>>9174460
eh
>>9174474
cop
>>9175425
cop
>>9175672
nah
>>9175679
no
>>9175794
not for 100
>>9175801
lows only
>>9175876
right but dont actually get any of those, converse, vans or basic nikes are better

>> No.9176018
File: 2.01 MB, 435x251, saucepls.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9176018

>>9170353
where to cop please

>> No.9176020

>>9176018
Got it.

http://cottonproject.com.br/camisas/moletom-hero-preto.html

>> No.9176029

>>9176020
thanks my negro

>> No.9176050

>>9170652
s/o to all th pear

>> No.9176068

>>9175999
I'm >>9175876
I already have a basic pair of vans, these are for cross-training so I needed something functional.

Also, why say cop for >>9170921 but not mine? They're the same shoe.

>> No.9176073
File: 59 KB, 930x960, 10841616_623007887803802_346111141_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9176073

yea or neigh?

>> No.9176076
File: 19 KB, 455x475, 495136_mrp_in_l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9176076

>>9165381
LANVIN CHELSEAS

>> No.9176082
File: 53 KB, 616x359, common-projects-derby_616.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9176082

>>9176076
OR CP DERBIES

>> No.9176092

>>9176068
i like that colourway
and
>The reason being that I live in China at the moment so I can only find like 3 shoes that fit me.

if they are functional then it doesnt matter if they look good right? but i would go for a more muted colourway (like the other one) if you wanted them to look good too.

>> No.9176099

>>9176073
yea

>> No.9176102

>>9176076
Not. Theyre too chunky.

>> No.9176104

>>9176073
where to buy?

>> No.9176107

>>9176082
CP Derbies

>> No.9176108

>>9176076
>>9176082
Neither.
But especially not the CP's.

>> No.9176117

>>9174408
from objective pov fbt looks retarded af.

the only appeal is from kanye wearing it and the ridiculous price.

>> No.9176122

>>9176092
>if they are functional then it doesnt matter if they look good right?

True, but at the same time I gots to look fly. Thanks for the advice--I'm not a huge fan of the mint thing the other shoe has going on but I'll try and find a more pastel look.

>> No.9176133

>>9176076
Dont listen to this plebster basic bitch fag >>9176107, go for chelseas.

>> No.9176141

>>9176082
ask yourself what you're going to use more in life, they both look fucking great tho

>> No.9176159
File: 336 KB, 908x696, ss+(2014-12-06+at+07.23.30).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9176159

>>9176122
found these
D4S5L-0202

these are cool too
D2J4L-0262
DL408-0101

>> No.9176165

>>9176104
http://toastyco.bigcartel.com/product/floral-shoppe-sweatshirt

>> No.9176217

>>9176165
oh god that back print fucking ruins the whole thing wtf dnc

>> No.9176246

>>9176159
I love that! I feel like I'm revealing my power level by not knowing what to do with those identifiers at all though.

>> No.9176283

>>9176246
oh its just the id number for the shoes, if you search it in google it should come up with pictures of them and places to buy, a bit like the ISBN of a book

>> No.9176556
File: 104 KB, 870x1227, to cop or not to cop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9176556

See filename

>> No.9176791
File: 32 KB, 531x667, l_22161254.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9176791

Cop or not?

>> No.9176803

>>9175999
hmm, then w2c something similar to that pigalle sweater without the logo? that was legitimately my only qualm with it

>> No.9176804

>>9176556
i cant believe you even consider to cop

>> No.9176895

>>9176556
second one def

>> No.9176935

>>9176556
Middle one if I had to cop one

>> No.9176972
File: 121 KB, 1024x705, 4870379151.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9176972

Cop?

>> No.9176993

>>9176972
Nay

>> No.9177053

>>9176972
no leather anything is played out.

>> No.9177136

>>9177053
damn...

i better throw away my shoes and my wallet

>> No.9177246

>>9175999
Your opinion sucks.