[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 82 KB, 1000x1000, 14-01-2014_adidas_stansmith_green1[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9095789 No.9095789 [Reply] [Original]

now that the dust has settled has there been any good fits for stans?

>> No.9095819
File: 410 KB, 615x481, raf in stans.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9095819

anytime raf wears em

>> No.9095822
File: 67 KB, 640x640, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9095822

>>9095789

>> No.9095840

>>9095789
WHO THE FUCK IS STAN SMITH

>> No.9095842

>>9095840
that one white dude that rapped with Kid cUdi on his latest album

>> No.9095872

>>9095842
FUCK

>> No.9095875

>>9095842
thought he was a tennis player

>> No.9095891

>>9095875
wtf where did you get that from?

>> No.9095903

>>9095891
they're made by an athletic clothing company, and the tab says "endorsed by stan smith"

my bad then, didn't know he was a rapper

>> No.9095914

>>9095903
Way to go anon!

>> No.9095938

>>9095903
dumb ass

>> No.9095957

>>9095840
He's a retired tennis player and he also used to skateboard in his free time, they say he was legendary and that some pro-skateboarders like Mark Gonzales were just diet version of what stan smith did. The shoe has a very nice history to it which is why I like it so much.

>> No.9095986

>>9095903
lol holy shit

>> No.9096053

Lol. It was goat at best

>> No.9097015

best fit for stan smiths, in descending order:
1) inside a box, left in a storeroom/warehouse to rot
2) black trash bag
3) any other color trash bag

>> No.9097359

>>9097015
Be careful not to cut yourself on all that edge

>> No.9097364

>>9097359
i'd cut myself if i ever wore stan smiths

>> No.9097382
File: 64 KB, 500x667, 1415141486015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097382

>> No.9097504

What's the hate for on the Stan smiths? I don't understand why everyone on 4chan hates them

>> No.9097512

>>9097382
who keeps reposting this shit fit

>> No.9097544

>>9097504
Because it's not CPs.

>> No.9097547

>>9097364
That's stupid, why not just take off the shoes? You're stupid.

>> No.9097558
File: 29 KB, 300x275, How-to-attract-beautiful-women-300x275.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097558

>>9097504
Dude you're on the internet and on the internet no one would fuck this girl because she's ugly and everyone has better standards. Do you understand?

>> No.9097590

>>9097504
they're shit in every single aspect:
shit materials
shit construction, not even made by skilled child laborers like nike products
shit cuts
shit design
shit colorways
shit logos

>> No.9097605
File: 558 KB, 809x1000, stan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097605

>>9095789

My patrician cats like them.

>> No.9097658
File: 366 KB, 960x1280, 1412344983776.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097658

>>9097605
few good fits from the waywt yeah

>> No.9097671

>>9097605
w2c cats? what breed?

>> No.9097675
File: 1.58 MB, 3179x4928, 1415290864469.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097675

>>9097658

>> No.9097693
File: 868 KB, 1535x2475, 1413114160048.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097693

>>9097675

>> No.9097705
File: 112 KB, 672x672, 1414078435197.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097705

>>9097693

>> No.9097745

I live in Paris and every goddam person has a pair of these on. seriously. they're everywhere. RIP STANS

>throws em in the pile with roshes

>> No.9097768

>>9097658
this is me and i got CPs yesterday. think im gonna sell that pair lol. still got love for the stans tho. if anybody want them hit me up, shipping from the uk. size 10

>> No.9097785
File: 77 KB, 960x720, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097785

>>9095789
I love my Stans, have two of them in fact.
White/green are the premium version and the blacks obviously aren't.

My fit yesterday with the cropped pants wasn't the best since I needed different socks etc but I love showcasing them and making them the centre of the outfit.
I like the history behind them a lot as well, I want to get to the point where I'm wearing a lot of iconic shoes and clothes.

>> No.9097800

>>9097745
>boohoo someone is wearing my shoes!

>> No.9097801

>>9097658
w2c parka?

>> No.9097804

>>9097801
Looks like cheap monday bart.

>> No.9097805

>>9097801
cheap monday bart

>> No.9097865

>>9097800
Fuccboi/10

>boohoo millions of normies are wearing the shoes

fixed it for you newfag. Stans are pleb-tier and if you disagree, you must be a broke manlet.

>> No.9097872

Why are they so narrow? How to stretch them out?

>> No.9097887

>>9097865
>normies
enjoy your special snowflake maymay shoes, millions of normies confirmed for cooler than you.

>> No.9098098
File: 42 KB, 590x885, m-060214_CFDA_Raf_Simons_landing[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9098098

>>9095819
>'it'll look better once I apply a filter'

>> No.9098201

>>9098098
Looks pretty good without a filter anyway, that is what I wanna wear when Im Raf's age.

>> No.9098229

>>9097865
If you rely that much on clothes to distinguish yourself from the normies, you probably are a pleb yourself.

With autism.

>> No.9098275

Whats the difference from the Stans with the face in the tongue and the ones without it?

>> No.9098290

>>9098275
The edition. I want to get the ones with the vulc sole because the face on the tongue has an actual black felt mustache

>> No.9098536

>>9098229
>defending pleb-tier shoes on a Burmese cartoon fetish porn forum
>implying you're not the one who's autistic

buttdevastation.jpg

Stay broke w/ your pakiStan Smith niggerwear

>> No.9098890

>>9098536
underrated post

>> No.9099027

>>9097693
>>9097675
w2c sweaters

>> No.9099063

ITT long coats and stans

>>9098098
pic was snagged of google friend, I agree it looks better without

>> No.9099129

>>9098536
>>9098890
samefag

>> No.9099439

>>9095957
he didn't skateboard fag

>> No.9099451

>>9097675
w2c pants?

>> No.9099478

>>9099439
Ya he did lol, learn your shit before you talk it.

>> No.9099557

>>9099129
>muh clever rebuttal

>> No.9099691

>>9095957
>actually falling for that video
kek

>> No.9099715

>>9097504
Look at a pair at Footlocker and you'll see why. I know nothing about leather, and I could tell it's paper-thin just when I picked up the shoes.

>> No.9099730

>>9095822
>>9097382
>>9097658
>>9097675
>>9097705
What good brands make black pants like these?

>> No.9099740

>>9099730

Acne
Cheap Monday
SLP
APC

>> No.9099759

>>9095789
The only dust is on those dusty ass, brokeboi ass, pussy ass, ugly ass, bitch ass shoes

>> No.9099769

>>9097785
What shoes are those?

>> No.9099775

>>9097015
>>9097364
>>9097590
>>9097865
>>9098536
>>9099557
>>9099715
>>9099759
is /b/eddit invading?

>> No.9099784

>>9099775
the only thing invading is when my balls invade ur moms mouth fagit

>> No.9099808

>>9097558
this. so much.

>> No.9099818

>>9098536
attacking the best sold shoe over the internet.

Why haven't you killed yourself yet?

>> No.9099821

i wish they offered a premium OG edition that's exactly like the first year, with felted heel and everything

>> No.9099824

>>9099784
that's it I'm out of /fa/

God damn it.

>> No.9099850

>>9099818

stay poor, buttmad shitskin

>> No.9099856

>>9099818
>popular = good

All you're saying is that Stan Smiths are the Call of Duty of shoes

Aka recycled, unimaginative garbage

>> No.9099882
File: 163 KB, 1101x1499, funnyclown.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9099882

>> No.9099891

>>9099856
it's a timeless design, CPs are pretty much a copy of these with silhouette variations

>> No.9099896

>>9099891
>I have no clue what I'm talking about

No one owns a shoe silhouette, you faggotron 5000

>> No.9099909

>>9097705
w2c coat

>> No.9099951
File: 98 KB, 986x740, 1343973382389.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9099951

>>9099784
fucking #DUNKED

>> No.9099983

>>9095789
CPs >

>> No.9100144 [DELETED] 

>>9099983
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6t81M5xY9Uk

>> No.9100291

>>9097658

What sneakers are those?

>> No.9100520

>>9099769
Uhh.
They're both Stans.

>> No.9100555

>>9097768
How much do you want for them?

>> No.9100692

>>9099896

No one owns it but every shoe that comes after is just a copy.

>> No.9100706

>>9097675
W2C Pants

>> No.9100743

>>9100692
Not the guy you replied to, but you're wrong.

If your first word was dada, does that mean that you were copying every baby before you in history whose first word was dada?

>> No.9100769

>>9100743
That's not even close to the same thing. The baby just naturally says what comes to it. Designers look for inspiration from other things, there's hardly such a thing as a completely original idea. The closet you can get to one is by borrowing elements from existing ideas.

>> No.9100829

>>9099784

/thread

>> No.9100920

>>9100555
£30+shipping. they're less than half a year old

>> No.9100930

>>9100920
What colour and any pics?

>> No.9100952

>>9100930
Are you fucking dense? He's selling his white stans from this pic >>9097658

>> No.9101346

>>9100920
email me at alex@inteheltfel.se

>> No.9101358

>>9097605

>tfw no effay monochrome cats to incorporate in sick fits.

>> No.9101380

for americans who want all white stan smiths then barneys sells a pair thats exclusive to them.

instead of the stan smith logo it says barneys NY or s/t in gold lettering

>> No.9101485

>>9098536
>Burmese cartoon fetish porn forum
get off of my chinese cartoon bbs

>> No.9101763
File: 1.26 MB, 2592x1456, WP_20141119_004.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9101763

Stans would be ok if they at least looked like fleather, but they look like fucking plastic-covered foam. These are better imo

>> No.9101787

>>9101485

>m-muh meme ownership

autismo massimo

>> No.9102236

>>9100769
It's entirely the same thing

Just because a designer says "Hey, I have a swell idea! Let's design a basic white shoe!" doesn't mean that he's tacking on "let's make sure to make them just like common projects except a little different" at the end.

No one owns the idea of a basic white shoe.

By your logic, common projects copied the very first maker of a basic white shoe hundreds of years ago. Then those people copied the first cavemen who wore white cloths over their feet.

Faggot.

>> No.9102570

>>9102236
underrated post

>> No.9102626

man why are these stan smith haters frothing at the mouth
these are shoes you dont own, dont like, and dont see very often. yet you're raging about how shit, unimaginative and poverty-tier they are? (dont really understand the unimaginative part, they sort of exist to be simple. by that logic national standards, adrians, cps, buttero are all unimaginative, but they aren't actually are they)
come on now. it's not that deep. these are basic sneakers here
i like stans but that's just my opinion. calm down you absolute nerds

>> No.9102763

>>9102236
>>9102570
Samefag.
>By your logic, common projects copied the very first maker of a basic white shoe hundreds of years ago. Then those people copied the first cavemen who wore white cloths over their feet.
that's how clothing works dude, it evolves from existing ideas. Is that so hard to grasp? Do you even know the process to designing clothes? You hardly ever just have a shape pop into your head unless you're planning to make some high fashion runway pieces. CPs seem obviously inspired atleast in part by stans smiths which is an iconinc shoe model that's been around for decades and has always been popular. And as for stans themselves, they seem to obviously inspired by chuck all-stars.
I don't see at all how a baby saying dada is the same as designing a pair of shoes. One is the first word you ever say which you only even say because you copy your parents telling you to say it, the other is a creative idea, and all ideas take inspiration from something you've acquired information about.

>> No.9102806

>>9102236
#ethered

>> No.9102825

>>9102626
I don't own them, but I have handled them and don't like them, and I do see them often. Yes, they are simple, and but they would be better if they were of better quality.

>> No.9102867

anybody who thinks cps weren't inspired by stan smiths is deluded
to clarify, i prefer cps over stans smiths, the stan smiths are too bulky for me and i think the cp silhouette is perfect
stan smiths inspired achilles, sl06 etc
that isn't anything to be ashamed of. what designer doesn't draw inspiration from other pieces?

>> No.9103183

>>9102806
Not really

>> No.9103214
File: 4 KB, 412x74, ss+(2014-11-19+at+03.11.41).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9103214

>>9102763
>Samefag

You wish.

Thanks for your two cents, Dr. Rick Owens.

Sorry that you lost.

>> No.9103657

>>9103214
>actually posting this reply

>> No.9103660

>>9103214
>Dr. Rick Owens

CHEERS
H
E
E
R
S

R

>> No.9104014

>>9099730
blue sweater fit is levis

>> No.9104046

stan smiths only look good with like a slim silhouette outfits. the toebox makes such a nice contrast.
shit like
>>9097675
>>9097382
>>9097705
don't look good imo

>> No.9104217

>>9103214
>Dr. Rick Owens

this is a thing now

>> No.9105855

>>9099784
I didn't ask for your favourite drink

>> No.9105860
File: 133 KB, 1162x850, 1310428654001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9105860

someone stole my navy stan smiths from the gym last night

>> No.9106496

>>9104217
Not him but just because someone else shares your stupid opinion doesn't mean you're right. It just means you're both idiots.

>> No.9106781
File: 7 KB, 196x250, 1350042867875.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9106781

>>9095903
christ

>> No.9106803

>>9105860
;_;

>> No.9106846

>>9097675
w2c parka

>> No.9106860

>>9106846
cheap monday tor parka?

>> No.9107138
File: 26 KB, 580x384, swag.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9107138

>not wearing matchplays

>> No.9107148

>>9106846
llbean
forgot model

>> No.9107184
File: 44 KB, 671x671, 8881379740_1b1535aa83_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9107184

i'm probably going to shell out an extra 20 bucks and get the kent wang basic white leather sneaker instead. I think its a lot better looking than the stan smith, better construction, etc.

>> No.9107191

stan smiths are what chavs wore when they couldn't afford air max

>> No.9107207

>>9107184
>better construction.
I'm not sure about that. The stans atleast have stitched on soles.

>> No.9107239

>>9107184
>kent wangs
DO NOT COP