[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 308 KB, 500x594, 116689_Yacht-Master-II-QQ-a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9093752 No.9093752 [Reply] [Original]

underrated edition

>> No.9094016
File: 86 KB, 1000x493, DSC_2963.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9094016

>>9093752
I bought this when I was 12, but I wish I would have spent my money more wisely looking back on it.

>> No.9094041
File: 2.29 MB, 1136x852, 1QOOZgt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9094041

>>9094016
These days though I mostly wear something like this.

>> No.9094173

So I went to costco because some guy posted it in the other thread. They really do have decent watches there. I swa a citizen for 180 that I saw in a boutique downtown going for 670

>> No.9094647
File: 199 KB, 578x425, 20141116_140824-1-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9094647

My Pam
>>inb4 duhrr duhrr fedora

>> No.9094659

>Wearing a watch when everyone carries a cell phone that has the time on it makes you look like a tryhard dadcore retard

Prove me wrong. I really want you to.

>> No.9094673

>>9094173
check ebay.

I've bought a few higher ends (tissot seastar/omega seamaster) from JOMAshop

http://stores.ebay.com/jomashop/

plus I am pretty sure he is located in florida.. So no tax if you don't live there

>> No.9094682

>>9094659
u cant
;^)

>> No.9094710

>>9094659
That why a timex weekender is all you need, stylish and cost effective.

>> No.9094759
File: 398 KB, 2560x1920, 1117141841~2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9094759

>>9094710
>>9094710

Mine was waiting for me at my doorstep today. I wanted to hate it. I love it.

>> No.9094768
File: 587 KB, 1767x1587, VC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9094768

>>9094647
Another one I truly love.

>> No.9094783

>>9094659
some people have jobs where they can't constantly pull out their phone to check the time. are you 12?

>> No.9094788
File: 182 KB, 700x508, 1387070592066.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9094788

>>9094659
>be me
>be out in super rainy ass day today
>need to know what time it is so im not late for class
>pull out phone
>gets water in it and breaks

>> No.9094789

>>9094659
Yeah, because digging into your pocket to check the time doesn't make you look like a total pleb.

>> No.9094791

>>9094673
Shit son, this is pretty nice. Thanks a ton

>> No.9094795

>>9094659
I work in medicine and have to use my watch regularly, brah.

>> No.9094830

>>9094659
I'm not a lawyer but work in a courtroom - no phones allowed m8. Also uni exams as well. Also when I go bike riding, swimming, driving...

>> No.9094841
File: 82 KB, 1024x682, Rolex GMT master II 16710 L serial 1990.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9094841

post your grail watch. pic related

>> No.9094851
File: 287 KB, 1024x683, Vacheron-Constantin-Historiques.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9094851

>>9094841
maybe in white gold though

>> No.9094852

>>9094659
lol no one is asking you to buy a watch. it's completely okay to be a brokeboi who can't afford one. the point is that the whole culture behind watches gives lots to appreciate and is a fun thing to do for people with the money for it.

>> No.9094853

>>9094851
mmm so sexy

>> No.9094860

>>9094851
wow. i love it. although it's something to be worn at formal occasions unless you wear a suit every day. which i certainly do not

>> No.9094865
File: 14 KB, 224x225, 1407869850416.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9094865

>>9094659
>>9094659
Because I cound't fucking care the least about your moronic reasons to question my preference regarding if I wear my watches or not. Grow up son.

Also, here in /fa/ most people are always too blody worried about what others think of them. I don't care what everyone does; I solely care if I like it or not.

>> No.9094877
File: 460 KB, 905x623, smuggshock.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9094877

>> No.9094882

>>9094877
God, why do people wear these fucking things?

>> No.9094886

>>9094882
MUH OPERATOR WATCH

>> No.9094902

>>9094851
Lovely. Vacheron Constantin is one of my favorite houses. This is mine. >>9094768
BTW, if given the oportunity I would choose the rose gold or platinum versions. WG tones are too similar to steel and regarding that watch a bit of disctintion doesn't hurt, but mesmerizes. :-)

>> No.9094920

Guise, what's a good starter watch? I'm looking at the Timex weekender for its practicality, but I've always liked the more classic-looking watches.

>> No.9094978

>>9094710
>>9094759
I like it but it is so LOUD. If I'm in a quiet room and I put it in my desk, I can still hear it ticking.

>> No.9095065

>>9094659
So you're telling me, because of cellphones I have to revert to a pre-20th century method to check for the time? And then when my phone dies I'm stuck with the pre-16th century method of telling time, looking for a fucking clock. No one looks like a tryhard wearing a watch, you look like a child not wearing one.

>> No.9095078

>>9094041
Is this watch decent? Compared to other similar priced or more expensive watches especially?

>> No.9095202

>>9095078
I got mine for like $6 at a thrift store. It has been as accurate as you'd expect a cheap Quartz watch to be. It drifts maybe 5 minutes or so every few months. Obviously my Tag keeps better time but the Casio is acceptable for what it is.

>> No.9095207

>>9094710
>>9094759
Are there any similar minimalist watches to the Timex Weekender that aren't as loud and don't cost a fortune?

>> No.9095340
File: 1.95 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9095340

Vintage Seiko, expansion band. Comfy af and really sleek

>> No.9095465
File: 2.42 MB, 1944x2592, IMG_20141106_101309.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9095465

>>9095207
snk809 maybe? The weekender isn't really what I'd call minimalist. Any mechanical watch will be quieter.
>>9094920
a.pomf.se/apifte.png

>> No.9095487

>>9095078
It's ugly as fuck

>> No.9095490

>>9095487
fuck off, you have shit opinions

>> No.9095493
File: 17 KB, 416x317, 1409114950506.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9095493

>>9095465
>piece of shit think pad
>tacky rolex

>> No.9095495
File: 1.64 MB, 1944x2592, IMG_20141104_151640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9095495

>> No.9095502
File: 1.40 MB, 1944x2592, IMG_20141102_135305.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9095502

>>9095493
you too

>> No.9095510
File: 51 KB, 500x333, tumblr_lzekbt98Li1qa9pnro1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9095510

>>9095487
I mean, It's just a Rolex Submariner clone. The strap in that picture is pretty bad but my strap is closer to this.

>> No.9095516
File: 999 KB, 1944x2592, IMG_20141104_180439.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9095516

>> No.9095530

I never realised how fat /fa/ is

>> No.9095561

>>9095530
How? I see only skelly wrists.

>> No.9095858
File: 1.30 MB, 3264x2176, citizen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9095858

This thing is built like a tank

>> No.9096130
File: 25 KB, 320x240, ANCON Magnus 07.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9096130

>> No.9096131

>>9096130
stop

>> No.9096136
File: 137 KB, 860x867, Ancon-Magnus-Watch-16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9096136

>>9096130

>> No.9096138

>>9095510
Submariners are hideous

>> No.9096140

>>9096130
>>9096136
Every fucking time.

>> No.9096150
File: 2.62 MB, 3984x2988, 1416298697603-150310635.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9096150

Should I change the plexiglass, or keep it original?

>> No.9096153

>>9096150
What do you think you should do?
That's what matters most.

>> No.9096170
File: 591 KB, 5184x3456, IMG_1362.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9096170

get on my fucking level...

>> No.9096181
File: 33 KB, 352x471, venturarepro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9096181

>>9096170
Ayy lmao

>> No.9096186
File: 169 KB, 1188x1600, $_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9096186

What do you guys think, would this be wearable as a casual watch with a nylon strap? Or is it strictly a dress watch.

I've been wanting to buy one for while but want to make it a daily watch.

>> No.9096193

>>9096181
FUCK!!!!

>> No.9096284
File: 196 KB, 975x440, awefawf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9096284

Anyone notice the update to the OVM on Steinhart's website?

>> No.9096294

>>9096170
no thanks

>> No.9096317
File: 190 KB, 791x800, Rolex 5517 MilSub.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9096317

>>9096284
yes and it's good. The grey dial makes the rest of the 'patina' look a lot realer. The correct WR makes sense - it was dumb that they'd have it incorrect just to be true to the original

only thing I would have preferred is the 'OCEAN ONE' to be in a smaller font.

>> No.9096322

>>9096284
The steinhart symbol really lets the brand down. it's so cartoony

>> No.9096348
File: 192 KB, 817x706, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9096348

>>9096317
Your opinion is spot on with mine. Don't care too much for the "Ocean One" addition, but it could be a little smaller.

>>9096322
What makes you say it looks cartoony? The mix of font between Steinhart and Ocean One? The actual logo itself? Just curious.

>> No.9096349

>>9096348
not the font, just the italic (S) in a circle with the shitty haircut. It looks like something out of Kimpossible.

>> No.9096880

>>9096130
>>9096136

> Ancon shill on /fa/

You made a watch that was trying to be two things at once. Learn from your mistake and get back to making hectic Cali dials.

>> No.9096885

>>9096284

Copped original. Keen

>> No.9096889

>>9096348

> Black bezel
> Grey dial

No thanks. Sure you could age it but naw man. I prefer the original.

> but the 'fake vintage lume' doesn't put you off with the black/black?

No. It's yellow lume ffs. Black and yellow bitch.

>> No.9096907
File: 389 KB, 1600x1200, B&S watch on Leather Nato 02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9096907

>>9096186
That's wearable with a NATO in the way that every watch is wearable with a NATO. I'd personally put it on a leather NATO though.

>> No.9096977

>>9094016
its ugly as fuck. you should have bought an aquaracer

>> No.9097304

>>9094016
I now I'm supose to understand different tastes, styles and incomes, but I can't pass thru that fucking plastic bezel, it's cheap and shitty.

>>9094041
Tought it was a Rolex.
>oh well...

>> No.9097321

>>9097304
*Thought
>>Fuck me

>> No.9097354

>>9097304
Mine actually is all stainless but I put a leather strap on it and that is the only picture I could find with a leather strap

And, yeah, it is a Casio but they look Identical and I can take it with me without worrying when I travel abroad.

>> No.9097357
File: 1.85 MB, 1024x768, fWlrqxR.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097357

>>9094841
;^)

>> No.9097360

>>9095495
smells like fake

>> No.9097366

>>9097357
I know this is excellent collection and some top notch watches, but to be honest I wouldn't wear any of those ugly motherfuckers.

>> No.9097375

>>9097357
Hnnnnnngggggg
That royal oak looks so good, so much better than the niggery offshore.
I want one so badly.

>> No.9097376

>>9097375
What's stopping you anon?

>> No.9097384

>>9097357
Like I said in the previous thread, nice collection. A bit small, though. You shold now search for a elegant/black tie watch for special ocassions.

>> No.9097389

>>9097384
>elegant/black tie watch for special ocassions
That's what the reverso is for

>> No.9097396

>>9097357
>tfw this guy has my grails sans datograph

>> No.9097406

>>9097396
Godly taste anon

>> No.9097417

>>9097389
Then I think it lacks a little bit of shine, wow factor look. A black tie watch has to mesmerize on it own, mainly due to the rest of the outfit will be extremely formal and sober.

>> No.9097418

>>9097389
Do you own watch winder? Or do you just let some of them stop when you don't wear them? I wanted to get myself another mechanical, but the idea of having to get automated watch winder or dealing with unused mechanism degrading with time is stopping me. How do you deal with that issue? Do you wind them all daily or just not care at all?

>> No.9097423

>>9097417
'wow factor' watch with a formal outfit? pleb as fuck
actually, watch you wear for occasions should not be easily noticeable, that's what makes it elegant

>> No.9097428

>>9097418
I have a watchwinder
http://www.klokkegiganten.no/watch-winder-ka015-burl

>> No.9097435

>>9097418
Do not fall for the authomatic winder fad. If you are going to use it constantely (say, every other day) you might need a winder if the reserve de marche is small but, if you aren't using them continuosly or have a decent power reserve don't bother with a winder, you'll only shorten the time between services and cost you more.
>Do you think a car, if kept running day and night all the time wouldn't wear faster? Same here.

>> No.9097442

>>9097428
>http://www.klokkegiganten.no/watch-winder-ka015-burl
but then, doesn't it feel kinda bad to own a great watch, that spends majority of its lifespan inside a machine and not on your wrists? the gears get used all the same and you are not even using i for most of the time, feels like such a waste to me

>> No.9097444

>>9097423
Wow factor doens't mean trashy or glittery. It means that you know, and just a vey few other that knows watches, that you have something truly special in your wrist.
>>You are still thinking about the case, not the inside of the watch.

>> No.9097446

>>9097435
>>Do you think a car, if kept running day and night all the time wouldn't wear faster? Same here.
actually it's the opposite with watches

>> No.9097451

>>9097444
>implying reverse is not just that

>> No.9097454

>>9097442
I manage to use them atleast once a week, so no.

>> No.9097456

>>9097444
It's a reverso tribute to the the first reverso. The few others that knows watches, knows that-

>> No.9097458

>>9097446
Not at all m8. Most watches have lubricants coeficents that work very well with letting the watch "rest" around two weeks between periods of use. Also, if you ever have watches that cost several hundreds dollars on their services alone, you'll thank giving them enough time between services.

>> No.9097474

>>9097451
>>9097456
I understand and love JLC quality (I have some and even wearing one of my Reversos right now) but what I'm speaking of is something like PP, AL&S, VC, Breguet, etc...
The finishing of the movement is thr difference I'm talking about.
I really like your Reverso but I'm sorry it's not just that special.

>> No.9097499
File: 34 KB, 375x570, t063_610_11_037_00.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097499

should i go for a tissot tradion?

>> No.9097503
File: 40 KB, 375x570, t063_617_11_037_00.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097503

>>9097499
or a tradion chronograph?

>> No.9097508

>>9097503
*tradition lel

>> No.9097525

>>9097503
perpetual calendar nigger

>> No.9097537

>>9097525
>>9097503
this

>> No.9097543

>>9097474
Remember there's a price difference between the grand complications and a reverso tho. And I personally like it the best (within it''s price range)

>> No.9097552
File: 191 KB, 375x570, T063_637_11_067_00_5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097552

>>9097525
also kinda hot i would love the black dial but on the tissot shop there is only white and brown?

>> No.9097580
File: 1.04 MB, 1944x2592, IMG_20141023_165713.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097580

>>9097525
ayy lmao
>>9097552
they sell black, white, and anthracite. that one is anthracite.

>> No.9097585

>>9097552
amazon.

>> No.9097609
File: 66 KB, 484x750, tumblr_newscuJ5zL1s8kje5o1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097609

What you think of that?

Shitty Mouvment but Swaggy design!

>> No.9097619
File: 47 KB, 700x700, 61+Uue-iqIL._UY700_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097619

>> No.9097630

>>9094783
That's a stupid reason to own a watch then

>implying your work area doesn't have a clock on the wall
>implying your computer also doesn't have a clock on it
>implying if you check your watch just as much as someone checks their phone it's just as disrespectful

There's simply no reason to have one

>> No.9097641

>>9097630
It's a fun hobby. People always try to come up with practical reasons that may or may not be valid but when it boils down to it some things just can't be rationalized purely by function. If they could we'd all be eating processed nutrient paste instead of food.

>> No.9097654
File: 303 KB, 779x781, 531431321.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097654

>>9097609
would order but not on amazon and im in europe
>>9097619
love the style

>> No.9097659

>>9097630
It's a fucking piece of jewelry, the only one man can wear. Is there any reason to wear rings? Bracelets? Necklaces? Earrings?

>> No.9097661

>>9097654
I don't know how somebody could ever rationalize purchasing something that 'looks' nice but isn't. It's like buying shit shoes with glued soles and terrible stitching.

>> No.9097663

>>9097580
that stupid clown stares at you when you look at the time

>> No.9097669

>>9097659
Also allows men to easily compare their social standing with their peers. Easiest way to display wealth without wearing blingy shit.

>> No.9097692

>>9097654
>denmark
Kek. Right. Which city in china changed its name to denmark?

>> No.9097763

>>9097543
I understand the price difference but seen that you already went for an AP and a JLC I supposed you could start saving to reach for somethig else. If I were you, to crown your nice collection I would buy a beautiful Vacheron Constantin Simple Patrimony 38 mm in rose gold and cream dial; maybe a neatley keept second hand one to save on price.
>>That Poiçon de Genéve

>> No.9097812
File: 55 KB, 800x600, vacheron_image.1966941.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9097812

>>9097763
Watch I'm talkin about.

>> No.9097885

>>9096170
congratz on having one nice watch

>> No.9097911

>>9096170
Don't like the Tag, rest is nice.

jelly/10

>> No.9098008

Am I gay for not liking dive watches?

I respect their pedigree and the design and engineering that go into them, but I don't see why people wear them casually. I just don't like the way they look but it seems like if you like watches you like/want dive watches.

tl;dr: Dive watches are ugly, am I dumb?

>> No.9098025
File: 274 KB, 1024x772, 14674634305_095bf444c0_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9098025

>>9098008
They're tool watches. Some people have a fetish for utilitarianism.
Some can be beautiful.

>> No.9098050

>>9098025

That I understand. I can see people being drawn to them for their use and history, definitely.

I, personally, really like aviation/pilot watches.

For some reason I'm just not drawn to dive watches, and I feel bad for it. However, those Tudors you posted are probably the nicest I've seen.

>> No.9098069

>>9098025
>tool watches
>utilitarian
>implying that people buy them for diving underwater

nigga what kind of kool aid have u been sippin

>> No.9098112

Is Citizen a good brand of watch? I'm poor.

>> No.9098125

>>9098112
Yes it is. Citizen is a great brand IMO.

>> No.9098142

>>9098050
Dive watches and sport watches in general work well for EDC if you're below the age of 30. The look of them you might like or not, but a lot of men do enjoy it quite a bit.

>> No.9098153
File: 384 KB, 1652x929, 20130920_094327.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9098153

>>9094841

>> No.9098209

>>9096150
change it. it looks like you bought a shitty used omega for £100 on ebay.

you want it to look like you didn't

>> No.9098221

>>9098125

Thanks!

>> No.9098407
File: 82 KB, 872x700, _DSC6607.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9098407

>>9094841

~$100 on Amazon

>> No.9098499
File: 64 KB, 765x1024, beqeda3y.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9098499

>>9098069
More utilitarian in that they have big ugly hands and big ugly indices with fucktons of lume in a big ugly case with a big ugly bezel.
and yes, diver's watches are considered a tool watch, regardless of what they're actually used for in practice.

>> No.9098508
File: 2.01 MB, 2592x1936, IMG_0280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9098508

this watch was my great grandfather's, it's been sitting in a box for years. can anyone tell me if it's genuine? it doesn't tick right now, and the glass is detached from the case.
the band is a Speidel.

>> No.9098514

>>9098508
Look between the lugs at 12:00 and post the serial number.

>> No.9098525

>>9098514
model number rather, serial is at 6:00 lugs
I can tell you a few ways you can check if it's a really shitty fake, this won't work on the more well made ones.
>crown should screw down
>adjusting the crown clockwise in time setting position should move the hands clockwise and vice versa
>crown should wind when unscrewed
The date magnifier looks correct at least.

>> No.9098535

>Love the way the Timex Weekender looks
>But too much TICK TICK TICK

Is my only sub-$100 alternative the Seiko 5?

>> No.9098558

>>9098535

It's not that bad, to me. I slept with mine in my room and it didn't bother me. However, I do sleep with my window open as well. I'm wearing mine as I'm typing in an empty office and I can hardly hear it. Definitely not annoying me in any way.

>> No.9098613

>>9098514
>>9098525
I can't see any numbers, but it's also covered with a layer of buildup (plus I don't really know what i'm looking for and my eyesight is bad). I can't twist the crown at all so far.

>> No.9098634

>>9098613
i just managed to unscrew the crown, date and time settings all work properly but i can't and/or don't know how to wind it.

>> No.9098689

>>9098407
What model?

>> No.9098691

>>9098499
Shill nigga. You're gonna get yourself a stroke of something.

>> No.9098707
File: 193 KB, 593x887, aefwfefd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9098707

>>9098050
>>9098008
People like what they like. Plenty of people don't care for the typical diver aesthetic.

That said of course, not all dive watches have such a tool appearance. Take the Longines Legend Diver, a super compressor diver, and the Lew & Huey Acionna which is something of a loose hybrid between a diver and pilots watch.

>> No.9098749

>>9098634
unscrewed without pulling it out at all is the winding position.
If I had to guess I'd say that it's genuine. Invest a little bit in a good service and maybe have the dial cleaned off a bit and you'll have a really nice piece.

>> No.9099024

>>9097609
garbage because no lume

>> No.9099060

>>9094659
>why buy a car everyone has legs that can take them anywhere

>why buy designer clothing, kmart shit covers you the same way

>> No.9099171

>>9099060
Kmart shit does cover you the same way
I wear jeans and a solid colour tee shirt with no design/visible brand every day
If it's cold I wear a solid colour sweater over too
I wear an F-91W too

>> No.9099211

>>9099171
>wearing clothing with visible branding
do people really do this?
that being said you sound like a really bland person. What kind of shoes do you wear?

>> No.9099238

>>9099211
Blank, tan suede shoes / brown hiking shoes
I'm actually the most fun person at parties, according to my friends, I just don't like giving brands free advertising

>> No.9099316

>>9098535
do you even poorfag guide

>> No.9099334

>>9099238
You sound like you dress horrible, why are you even here?

>> No.9099413
File: 1.97 MB, 4116x3456, gs-sbge021-23.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9099413

>>9098050

>> No.9099426

>>9099413

That's actually pretty fucking nice. Fucking Seiko.

>> No.9100039

>>9098535
Vostok amphibia is a decent choice

>> No.9100042
File: 392 KB, 1280x720, 20141118_223308.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9100042

I just bought this today at the shopping mall, on an impulse. I'm kinda of liking it a lot. It's also quite comfy.
What does /fa/ thinks?

>> No.9100069

>>9098707
Longiness looks fine, second one is so awful I just beat the crap out of my own brother in blind rage. You happy anon?

>>9099413
Nice Gran Seiko. Digging the bastard. Yours anon?

>> No.9100328

>>9097812
>hnnggg

>> No.9100348

>>9098689

One not worth buying bruh.

>> No.9100362

>>9098707

I have never, and never will understand the appeal of the Acciona.

> Tiny hands
> 6, 9, 12 font doesn't match the font on the internal bezel
> lugs look out of place
> That. Fucking. Dog.

Don't even get me started on their fucking "Legends" piece of shit. Worst design I've ever seen.

>> No.9100376

So my style is just sneakers, jeans, a t shirt most of the time and I wanna get a watch that will match that look.

What should I look into? I need babby's first watch.

>> No.9100385
File: 160 KB, 1024x683, 1956914d1415388501-possibly-next-helgray-model-dscf9683.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9100385

>>9100362
It's different. That's how I see it. Certainly wasn't my first choice, but after getting my Cerberus oddly enough, it's grown on me. I'll definitely agree that the lugs are right odd. Even more so on the bracelet with that massive end link.

And yet I want one.

>Legends
Yeah. No. With you on that, not a fan of it. Nor am I a fan of the Spectre. The Orthos is kinda in between IMO.

Speaking of micros, Helgray's newest model campaign should be launching pretty soon. Stoked for it.

>> No.9100390

Any recs on a entry level thin dress watch to go with a suit? I tried the rodina but it was too big on my wrist.

Prefer:
-white dial
-black leather strap
-no date, no seconds
~37-38 mm diameter, under 10 mm thickness

Kind of like this: http://www.jomashop.com/frederique-constant-watch-303s5b6.html

>> No.9100420
File: 60 KB, 400x299, Seiko-SKX007-2a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9100420

>>9100376
SKX007 on a rubber strap. Bulletproof.

Additionally you could swap it out for a nato or zulu strap.

>>9100390
Nomos immediately comes to mind, but fucking expensive and certainly not entry level.

For the size range you're looking for, your best bet is to go for a vintage piece. There aren't many, if any that I know of, dress watches under 10mm thick, under 40mm without seconds, other than a Daniel Wellington which is very much just a fashion brand that sell overpriced hipster watches.

The male model has a 40mm case 6mm thick and the womens model is a 36mm case 6mm thick.

The higher you go in price mind you, the more likely you are to find a dress watch that size.

Which criteria are more flexible?

>> No.9100537

>>9100420

how does the skx007 look on a babymans wrist?

>> No.9100553

>>9100537
Large but not gargantuan if your wrists are relatively flat.

How babywrist are we talking?

>> No.9100969
File: 375 KB, 1000x667, Rolex 5513 Sub.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9100969

>>9098008
they are an acquired taste.

It took me a couple of years of being completely immersed in my watch obsession before I started to appreciate them from an aesthetic point of view. They're not ugly, just robust. At first you'll like things that are slim and clean but eventually your tastes will change to the thickness and sharp edges of divers and their bezels, otherwise yeah you dumb lmao

>> No.9100996
File: 108 KB, 1024x683, Rolex DayDate Titanium glacierblue.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9100996

>>9098508
date magnification looks off. bracelet is incorrect. Day-Date's don't come in steel, they come in precious metals (platinum, gold etc) but I don't know if that has always been the case - this watch looks wicked old, 80's at least. The bezel doesn't look sharp enough either but that could be a result of your potato quality phone and the age of the watch.

take it to a respected Watch maker - not some monkey at the mall. He'll tell you in 20 seconds or less whether its genuine. My impressions though are that it's fake.

>> No.9101001
File: 273 KB, 1000x700, Seiko Hibeat GMT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9101001

>>9099426
GS have some gorgeous stuff

>> No.9101017
File: 3.14 MB, 1600x4500, WatchGuide.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9101017

>>9100376
don't listen to the SKX007 dipshit. Get something less bulky for a casual look.

>> No.9101035
File: 40 KB, 500x319, Swatch Once Again.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9101035

>>9100376
THIS is babys first watch.

>> No.9101044
File: 1.28 MB, 2816x2112, IMG_3351.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9101044

>>9100042

It had potential, then someone cracked it open.

http://watchguy.co.uk/review-a-trip-inside-the-swatch-sistem51-eta-c10111/

Swatch can suck my schlong.

>PLASTIC ESCAPE WHEEL AND PALLET FORK

Even The lowest of Chinese watch scum have more pride and dignity then that.

>> No.9101082

>>9101044
VERY interesting write up.

Also for such a hyped up piece they could have made something a little more attractive. The pseudo "constellation of jewels" artwork on the dial is fucking hideous.

>> No.9101157

>>9094016

>TAG Heuer
>bought when i was 12
>TAG Heuer
>i bought
>TAG Heuer
>i was 12

in what kind of world do we live in

>> No.9101165

hello lads

i have a watch which has a soft golden colour, but i am not sure what band to wear with said watch

right now i am wearing it with a fixoflex golden band but i think it is a tad bit too shiny, can anyone recommend me a band for causal wear?

>> No.9101171

>>9100420
>SKX007 on a rubber strap

Mine arrived today.

Obviously only had it for a short while but the rubber strap is garbage. Feels horrible on the wrist. Big sticker on attached to the back saying the movement is Malaysian and case assembled in China.

Buyer's remorse has begun...

Nato strap on it's way. Hopefully that will save me.

>> No.9101455

>>9096907
Love the look of this watch. Can anyone recommend something similar in style?

>That elegant near monotone colour scheme
>Those thick, solid case walls.

>> No.9101522

>>9100996
thanks yo this was pretty informative. i'm going to probably take it somewhere to have it checked out.
as i said earlier tho, the band isnt trying to pass as a rolex; it's made by Speidel.
If it does end up being a fake though, which watch under $500 should I look into that has a similar look to this and/or a datejust? I'm considering the Orient Union but i'd really love something with a fluted bezel and a date magnifier.

>> No.9101531
File: 1.27 MB, 2592x1936, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9101531

>>9101035
i literally have that on my wrist right now but it doesnt have a magnifier. i bought it on a mountain in Switzerland last summer on impulse, lmao. i didnt know anything about watches

>> No.9101532

>>9101455
seiko snk355 if you're a super poorfag.
if you're willing to spend a little bit of money you could get a Tudor oysterdate. There's also a guy on repgeeks named mymanmatt who does awesome Datejust frankens with genuine dials, hands, crown, and crystal on top of a replica case with an ETA movement inside.

>> No.9101631

>>9100996
The date magnification isn't off. That's definitely 2.5x magnification.
What makes you think that watch is steel?
The fluted bezels back then were different than the ones they do now.They were more of a coin edge than the sharp ridges they have now.

>> No.9101634
File: 3.54 MB, 1600x4200, apifte.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9101634

>>9101017
>posting old versions of the guide

>> No.9101640

I can't decide between a Vostok amphibian or a mako orient that cost around twice as much.

the Vostok has the vintage look and neat Russian origin but I heard its not a really quality looking watch although it is durable as fuck.
the mako on the other hand has a really premium look to it with the changing hues on its dial and clicking bezel and solid crowns. FUCK WHAT SHOULD I DO

>> No.9101654

>>9101640
Just get the Mako/Ray mang

>> No.9101655

>>9101640
Amphibians are cheap as fuck right now on meranom if you switch the site to rubles. If that impacts your decision at all.

>> No.9101661
File: 58 KB, 614x400, laco-pilots-watch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9101661

Steinhart vs. Laco pilot/observer watch.

Should I just spring for the Laco for the history? Or will the Steinhart suffice?

>> No.9101662

>>9101640
The Mako is a higher quality product. By far. The bad things with the Mako are the end links, poor lume (still better than Vostok), and lack of ISO dive rating. In comparison to Seiko SKX models, the Orient Mako shows better value for price paid. The Vostok doesn't compare. Get the Mako for your daily use. Get the Vostok as a novelty.

>> No.9101683

>>9101662
>>9101654
>>9101655

what do you mean by iso dive ratings? don't both watches have water resist of 200m? and its gonna be my first watch, so I guess I'll go with the mako since its more reliable

thanks guys

>> No.9101693

>>9101661
Steinhart is better.

>> No.9101697

>>9101693

Really?

Even though omglacoreallymadenaziwatchesinww2?

>> No.9101735

>>9101697
They're German like hamilton is American. They use Miyota movements primarily.

>> No.9101745

>>9101683
ISO dive rating is like a guarantee that the watch is diving capable. The Mako is still fine, even though I haven't gone the full 200 meters under.

I should also mention that the Mako's movement is much better.

>> No.9101760

>>9101735

Damn, I just did some research. So they just take Miyota or ETA movements and engrave the Laco name and call them in-house movements?

>> No.9101776

>>9100996
My god that's beautiful.

>> No.9101785

>>9101661
>Muh nazi watch

>> No.9101789

>>9101745
damn you just sold me. movement on a watch is everything
btw, have you compared your mako to a ray? I really really like the look of the dots on the ray but the hands and bezel is uglier and there isn't that sweet hue. I'm not sure whether that tradeoff is worth it unless the ray somehow has a better movement

>> No.9101798

>>9101789
The ray is a mako with a different dial and hand set.

>> No.9101801

>>9101760
Yup. It's pretty underhanded.

>> No.9101811

>>9101789
The ray still has the same metallic sunburst look to it if you get the blue model. The ray has better lume, as far as what I've seen.

>> No.9101911

>>9101801

Guess I'll go with the Steinhart.

>> No.9101982

>>9101911

Any inexpensive remakes of this style of watch?

I'd like the original dial if possible. The one with the minutes on the outside of the dial and the hours indicated in the center with the dots per hour.

>> No.9102107

>>9101982
It's called a pilot watch.

>> No.9102233 [DELETED] 
File: 13 KB, 258x258, 1_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9102233

Worth $800?
From '98

>> No.9102239
File: 105 KB, 1142x715, Spoiler its quartz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9102239

Worth $800?
From '98

>> No.9102320

>>9102239

I don't know much about watches, but I'm assuming since it's Quartz, no.

>> No.9102331

>>9102239
yeah get it, you won't get a cheaper omega than that other than some old shitty one. as for the quartz, would you rather pay hundreds for the maintenance of a mechanical or a $10 for a quartz

>> No.9102342

>>9102239
>>9102320

Actually, after taking a look on eBay, seems around the price they're going for.

>> No.9102359

>>9102239
>omega
ugliest overpriced watches. There's literally nothing nice about them.

>> No.9102373

>>9101801
Not the guy you were talking with but how much better is steinhart compared to laco? I like the watchface on the laco much more, always been a fan of a busier watch face

>> No.9102732

>>9102373

I don't think the Laco is actually much better in quality. Laco just uses Miyota and ETA movements for the most part and names them as their own.

I think the automatic Steinharts use ETA movements. I can't imagine the Laco build quality being much higher, although their lume does look much brighter. Other than that I think the Steinhart is a better value for money.

>> No.9102849
File: 69 KB, 430x430, st5_front.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9102849

>>9102732
I think steinhart is easing itself off ETA movements since they're so hard to get now. They've started building their own movements now.

>> No.9103061

>>9102849
>>9102849

What's happened to ETA movements?

(I'm new to watches)

>> No.9103611

>>9100420
I'd be okay with a seconds hand, followed by date, but the dimensions are important for my 6.125" wrist.

That said, I've also been looking at this Bulova, yes or no?: http://www.amazon.com/Bulova-96B104-Silver-Dress-Watch/dp/B002IDTUHG/ref=sr_1_2?s=apparel&ie=UTF8&qid=1416443469&sr=1-2&keywords=bulova

>> No.9103834

>>9100385

Looks cool. Perhaps because of the lack of proper pics on their site.

Do you have any idea of the price?

>> No.9103883

>>9103061
Basically SWATCH Group turned into massive jews and refuse to sell ebauches (as in, movement bases) to companies outside SWATCH group for anyhing but a retarded markup.

Some brands like Breitling are in so deep they'll have to give but other makers are getting screwed. Or, at least, moving to companies that make ETA-clones (as the patents on the movements expired a while ago).

Steinhart, for example, seems to have come up with some way to make a 2824 clone either on their own machinery (doubtful) or via a sympathetic manufactory

>> No.9103896
File: 1.95 MB, 4724x3307, omega-seamaster-222080-james-bond-watch-casino-royale-2006.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9103896

>>9102359
I hope you're trolling. Omege is arguably THE best watch maker that has ever existed and IMO the best looking. I wish I could afford one.

>> No.9103951

>>9103896
>best that ever existed
>crap until 70's
>bracelets made in China
>prices jacked by marketing hype

I hope YOU'RE trolling

>> No.9103961
File: 261 KB, 1400x1050, IMG_2891-small.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9103961

>>9103896
fuck off

>> No.9103971
File: 596 KB, 1888x1164, 2344.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9103971

I'd never go as far as to call my diver ugly nor do I consider it a Submariner/Seamaster ripoff. Sure, it might not be the most elegant thing out there, but it's way better solution for EDC than a watch meant to be worn with a suit that in my honest opinion simply looks stupid on person below the age of 30 and/or worn with anything but a suit. Sure, there's a middle ground between sport watches and dress ones, but that's a different matter.

>> No.9104001

>>9103961
To be honest, Patek is only for ppl who don't know what to do with their spare cash or hardcore watch enthusiasts. It's not even a status symbol (ever seen president or wealthy politician witch Patek? Outside of Ukraine I mean), it's just an empty statement.
Omegas are amazing for what they are. It's an actual watch, and a great one at that (overpriced as they all are, sure). Their designs you might like or not, but I personally rate them way above anything Rolex ever did. They are also easily the most innovative watchmaker out there.

>> No.9104012
File: 1.98 MB, 400x326, output_9fY1t8.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9104012

>>9104001
patek makes better watches

>> No.9104021

>>9104012
They are better by such a small margin, that only
>hardcore watch enthusiast
could ever care and pay additional cash for that

>> No.9104022

>>9103951
>bracelets
u wot, that seamaster bracelet is probably the best that's ever been made it's a work of art

>> No.9104028
File: 54 KB, 381x573, seamaster300.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9104028

>>9104001
The new Seamaster. A tribute to the one released 50 years ago.

http://www.omegawatches.com/planet-omega/watchmaking/baselworld-2014?xtor=ADI-2467#!/seamaster-300-master-coaxial

I fucking love it. Would buy if I had 7k

>> No.9104031
File: 49 KB, 580x797, haldimann-horology-h8-sculptura.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9104031

>>9094841

I come from a world you might not be patrician enough to understand

>> No.9104039
File: 155 KB, 1024x1009, daytonarainbow1-1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9104039

>hater's face when

>> No.9104051

>>9094659
I don't carry a phone.

>> No.9104056

>>9102359
>>9103883
>>9103896
>>9103951
>>9103961
>>9104001
>>9104012
>>9104021
>>9104022
Such ignorance regarding watches is baffling as fuck.
>>You people need to grow up and learn that there are several different categories from which a watch can be measure that claims that "X is better tham Y" only makes you look like pampered cunts.

>> No.9104060

>>9104001
>>9104012
Do any of you hava a Patek or has at least hold one and played with it?
>Then how would you know the veracity of yout affirmations?

>> No.9104061

>>9104039
Jesus fuck, does this abomination really exist?

>> No.9104072

>>9102359
>>9103896
>>9103951
Same here. Have you ever owned an Omega?
>Then how the fuck would you know, if you can´t compare?

>> No.9104077

>>9104061
Believe it. It also came with a leopard pattern strap. (YIKES!!!)

>> No.9104089
File: 454 KB, 1024x887, PD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9104089

>>9104031
>>mfw I could say the very same thing about you.

>> No.9104098

>>9097630
Yes my work area does have 2 clocks in 2 locations, but watches are more convenient.
>hurr durr just go walk over there to look at the time or pull out your phone and look like you're wasting time

>> No.9104137

>>9101044
>>9101082
I knew it had a plastic scape wheel and fork, the former can actually be seen through the balance window in the back.

What amaze me is that in spite of the marketing campaigns, wich are a bit too much (one screw bla, bla, bla) the movement represents a very important advance in two especifica areas that you people blindly negate:
1) The fact that it is completely machine made (no humans involved in assembling) means it can actually try to compete wit the massive amounts of qwartz made by the minute in fully automated factories. If so, the mechanical strikeback is near and soon cheap watches could include a mechanical movement.
2)Because of the choose onf plastical material in the two componentes that sustain more wear this watch will endure longer without a theoretical service, thus providing a longer lifespan before turning into crap thrown into a drawer like most cheap qwartz end up today.

>> No.9104139 [DELETED] 

>>9101157
A good one.

>> No.9104143 [DELETED] 

>>9104139

Well, maybe it's a little unfair.

>> No.9104247
File: 241 KB, 1000x1106, IMG_4524.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9104247

>Just a reminder of what horological inspo should be.

>> No.9104259

>>9104247
I love that balance wheel.

>> No.9104273

>>9104259
Thanks m8. The entire movement is freaking awesome IMO.

>> No.9104313

>>9104273
I'm just afraid that by the time I have enough money for it they'll have discontinued the Bleu.

>> No.9104329

>>9101982
>I'd like the original dial if possible. The one with the minutes on the outside of the dial

that's actually the later style, "type b"
also don't focus on Laco so much, the watches were contracted from like five companies.

just search Flieger or Observer's Watch for replicas.
damned near everyone makes a copy, even Seiko.

>> No.9104398

>>9104313
This watches are made to endure decades, or even centuries if it's well preserved. F.P. Journe is so confident about the lifespan of his watches that he even delivers his minute repeaters with the spare parts needed (due to physical properties no gong or hammer will sound the same after 50 of so years of use) to allow this timepieces to remaing working for 200 years.

I'm shure that by the time money is not an issue you'll be able to find one still. (The irony is, chaces are it will be even more expensive so hurry up making them dollars, yo)

>> No.9104404
File: 180 KB, 1440x960, watch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9104404

Found a dead watch in an old nightstand. Don't know the model, but I'm suspecting having to open the back and replace the battery, yes?

>> No.9104412

>>9104404
Yes, take it to a watchmaker and have the battery replaced. The watch is cheap to begin with so replacement shouldn't charge you more than 40 dollars, if much.

>> No.9104419

>>9104412
getting a new battery is like $10 max

if you're paying anywhere near $40 then you are getting ripped the fuck off

>> No.9104430

>>9104419
It depends of the place you live. That's why I said "40 dollars, if much" wich is another way of saying no more than 40 dollars tops, any les will be more suitable.
Learn to read, my dear potato.

>> No.9104435

>>9104430
>It depends of the place you live.
no, it depends on how stupid you are.

unless youre living in monaco or dubai or some shit it's easy as fuck to find someone to replace a watch battery

learn to intellect, my dear vegetable

>> No.9104460

>>9104435
>unless youre living in monaco or dubai or some shit
You got it m8. :-)
>>Not all people have the same socioeconomic level plus, when I took my watches to a watchmaker I went to a proper Watchmaker, not some fella in a stand at the shopping mall. Now I do simple things like changing batteries and adjusting bracelets and straps by myself, is more fun.

>> No.9104464

>>9104435
Oh, and btw, stay pleb son.

>> No.9104472
File: 1.40 MB, 2448x3264, f300hz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9104472

My baby

>> No.9104478
File: 170 KB, 1280x720, 20140324_212419.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9104478

>>9104472
>>9104472

also this

>> No.9104480

>>9104472
Nice. What's the history behind it? Did you bought it or did you inherited it?

>> No.9104492

>>9104247
>dem dual barrels
>dat disconnected balance placement
hnggh

>> No.9104502

>>9104480
>>9104480

I bought it $335 USD. The strap is aftermarket no way was I going to pay Omega strap prices. It runs like a dream and is in great condition considering it's from the 1970's. Also the sweeping second hand is really smooth.

>> No.9104511

>>9104502
What's the size? Pics of the movement?

>> No.9104515
File: 10 KB, 320x272, vK9t3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9104515

>>9104492
I know m8, I know.

>> No.9104539
File: 176 KB, 1600x946, inside of case.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9104539

>>9104511
>>9104511

It uses a tuning fork movement which was licensed to Omega by Bulova. It's the same thing you would find in an Accutron but with Omega improvements.

As for size I believe it's about 36mm-38mm

>> No.9104611

>>9101789
The ray is a better mako. dial + hands only difference but they look so much nicer.

>> No.9104673
File: 202 KB, 1024x1686, Rolex-Daytona-Leopard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9104673

>>9104039
>>9104061
>>9104077
Here. Choke on this magnificence.

>> No.9104692

>>9095207
>weekender
>cost a fortune

wat

>> No.9104881

>>9104539
But....isn't that....quartz?

>> No.9105035

>>9104881
Several reputable houses has used qwartz in the past and even in present althought, mainly for their lady's lines. Examples on the top of my head: Patek Philippe, Vacheron Constantin, Jaeger LeCoultre, Audemars Piguet, etc...

>> No.9105313
File: 61 KB, 800x565, QQ_movt_close1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9105313

>>9101044
>plastic movements

>> No.9105486
File: 204 KB, 1024x682, Rolex GMT on Hodinkee kanga NATO.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9105486

>>9101165
leather NATO strap
like this; maybe in brown?

>> No.9105506
File: 58 KB, 640x480, seiko.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9105506

>>9101522
you might have trouble finding something with a date magnifier and a fluted bezel that isn't a Rolex - both are fairly rare features.

But in that price range I would maybe look at some higher end Seiko SARB's like pic. or perhaps a hamilton, tissot, graf zeppelin and maybe steinhart.

>> No.9105516

>>9104028
wait a couple years and pick one up for 4k in good condition. Omega don't hold their value that well but I agree this model is gowgeous

>> No.9105635
File: 247 KB, 1000x667, Steinhart_Nav_b_Uhr_Whole11[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9105635

>>9102373

Bruh you can get a type b dial flieger from Steinhart for the same money as the one pictured.

> pic related

You should really check out their website. They come in 44mm or 47mm, handwinding or auto.

>> No.9105639
File: 44 KB, 550x370, the cloonsta rocking ploprof1200.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9105639

>>9105635
>pro-tip
Don't buy a 47mm watch
>pro-tip 2.0
Don't buy a 44mm watch if your wrist is under 7" diameter

>> No.9105640
File: 209 KB, 511x470, 26257d1386562817-ocean-one-vintage-steinhart-ocean-one-vintage-.2[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9105640

>>9102849

All watches bar the Ocean One Vintage (pictured) still use an ETA 2824.

But as you rightly said, they're starting to ease off them.

ST5 and Soprod A10 will dominate.

I'm a bit uneasy about the ST5. I read a few threads on WUS outlining some manufacturing differences between the 2824 and the ST5.

>> No.9105641

>>9105640
Sellita SW200 is where it's at

>> No.9105646
File: 535 KB, 1652x926, 1416426664648.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9105646

>>9093752


Hello! /fa/ggots, I posted this earlier on /g/ thread.

What do you guys think about the aesthetics this chronograph? The sub-dials are functional.

>> No.9105647

>>9105639

I agree. I'm 7.5" and my 44 Steinhart is almost goofy looking.

I don't understand why manufacturers make watches larger than 42mm tbh. Anything more is too much.

>>9105641

They're good movements. I've got one in an Invicta. 9937OB so it was pretty good. It's fucked now though after a service department from a mall watch place ruined it.

Before you ask why I took it to such a godawful place, I needed to remove a rusted spring bar. The idiot dislodged a marker on the dial and in the process of fixing it 'accidentally dislodged' something in the movement, requiring it to be sent in for a 'free of charge' service.

>> No.9105649

>>9105646

Generic.

> CHRONOGRAPH
> 10 ATM
> Diving bezel on a watch with 100m WR
> 100m WR questionable due to pushers

> Champion in Ferrari font
> Skyline in Nissan Skyline font
> On a 'diver'

Ionno man, so many things off, but from a glance it looks alright. How much did you pay?

>> No.9105651

>>9105649

Approx 100 usd in swedish store.

I liked the looks of it and watches dont usually come ship here unless you import stuff.

>> No.9105652

>>9105651

You did okay then. If you like it then that's all that matters m8.

>> No.9105655

>>9105652

thanks brah,

Do you know what watch this is, as in which Seiko model?

>>9099413

Is it possible to get under 200 usd?

>> No.9105659

>>9105655

It's a limited edition Grand Seiko, you'll be paying about $7k+

Reference is in the image: SBGE021

Yes, people will and do pay thousands for a Seiko. I most certainly would if I could afford it. The quality is incredible.

It is something I had to wrap my head around when I first got into watches, but I am definitely a convert.

>> No.9105687

>>9105659

7K, fml,

I'm going to buy:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/MONTRE-NEW-RUSSIAN-VOSTOK-AUTO-AMPHIBIA-AMPHIBIAN-Zissou-DIVER-WATCH-420526-/231397128230?pt=FR_BijouxMontres_Montres_Classiques&hash=item35e057f826

and

A Seiko 5, not sure which one, perhaps

http://www.ebay.com/itm/SEIKO-5-Hombres-Automacitos-del-Reloj-Auto-Reloj-Negro-Plata-Reloj-SRP411K1-/400772597146?pt=ES_Relojes_de_pulsera&hash=item5d4fe8859a

>> No.9105693
File: 1.18 MB, 1324x786, nextwatches.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9105693

>>9105659

7K, fml,

I'm going to buy pic related

A Vostok and a Seiko 5

>> No.9105765
File: 218 KB, 600x900, 2415-710720s-Amphibian-SE-1-600x900[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9105765

>>9105693

I've got pic related on its way. Keen as beans m8

Enjoy your Vostok and Seiko 5.

>> No.9105797
File: 191 KB, 600x900, 2415-420913-Amphibian-1-600x900.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9105797

>>9105687
Hej igen
Om du handlar från adressen i bilden och betalar i rubel blir det ~400kr för en Vostok.
>ebay
Cheapestnatostraps skickar från Stockholm för övrigt.

>> No.9105862

>>9095516
Model number?

>> No.9105880
File: 1.80 MB, 1944x2592, IMG_20141106_101404.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9105880

>>9105862
SNKL43 m80

>> No.9106058

>>9104881
Not quartz. Tuning fork. Way cooler.
Continuous seconds hand is sexy and the watch literally hums.

>> No.9106079

>>9104329

Got it, Thanks man. And that's right, Nav-B is what I like.

>> No.9106190

>>9094041
I own one like that but the Diver edition.

>> No.9106206

>>9105880
how's the accuracy on that replica m8?
does it have a sweeping seconds hand?

>> No.9106264

>>9106206
It's got an ETA clone movement so yeah. It's 8bps.
Came unregulated but now runs well within COSC specs.

>> No.9106304

>>9105647
shit if you're under 7 inches around 41mm is pretty much your max. leads to big disappointments with certain divers like the Mako XL or >>9094041 that casio which are just fucking goofy on the wrist.

Why aren't divers <40mm standard any more?

>> No.9106485

>>9106304
Fashion trends are moving towards 60mm coke can watches because negroids set fashion trends now.

>> No.9106617

>>9106264
fucking nice. how much was it? where'd you cop?
i got a submariner "homage" (it's an exact replica except some random made up company logo instead of rolex)--the accuracy is great but unfortunately doesn't have the sweeping second hand.

>> No.9106647

>>9106617
That means it's quartz

>> No.9106657

>>9096170
mfw I'd never wear any of them

>> No.9106674

>>9106485
torobravos2014
the picture on the listing has an incorrect bezel installed but the one they sent me is correct so you should be fine.

>> No.9107000
File: 444 KB, 1000x698, dj.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9107000

Is there a better looking watch?

>> No.9107008

>>9107000

Yes, plenty.

>> No.9107009

>>9107000
yes, literally 90% of watches.

>> No.9107254

>>9106647
it's automatic m8... it came fucked up (90 sec. fast per day) and by just eyeballing it, i got it adjusted down to 4 - 5 seconds per day. the second hand doesn't TICK like a quartz, but it doesn't have the smooth sweep like a rollie either

>>9106674
i'm really tempted to get that tudor black bay replica

>> No.9107493

>>9107254

It probably oscilates at 21,600 bph, or 6hz. Rolex is 28,800 or 8hz. So that's two ticks per second difference, which means the actual ticking is more noticeable.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QhNZk7HKBo

The one on the right beats at 28.8, the other two are at 21.6.

I can't think of a Swiss auto movement that is less than 28.8.

>> No.9107515
File: 258 KB, 1024x768, 14488185077_1152583e17_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9107515

>>9107254
That BB replica is some A++ shit.

>> No.9107543
File: 133 KB, 800x748, 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9107543

>>9107515

>> No.9107596

>>9107515
>>9107543

The only difference is the crown. Jesus christ the Chinese are getting good.

Still, I could never live with the shame of wearing a replica. Buy something else for the few hundred IMO.

>> No.9107865

>>9096136
your arm hair looks like pubic hair

>> No.9107972

>>9107515

The one on the right is legit. Right?

>> No.9108387

>>9106058
>>9106058

pretty much this

>> No.9108430

>>9104472

Nice buy man. Got any wrist shots?

>> No.9108447

>>9095065
underrated post my m8. perfect response.

>> No.9108736

>>9094759

is so simple, i love it

>> No.9109405

>>9105880
Lmao rolling a Rolex with a thinkpad, you're not fooling anyone irl lmao

>> No.9110066

>>9108736
>so simple
>ticks so loudly it drives you insane

shit watch.