[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 799 KB, 603x608, Chelsea.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8899781 No.8899781 [Reply] [Original]

Chelsea thread cause Chelsea's are confirmed GOAT winter 2014 footwear.

>> No.8899790
File: 97 KB, 500x750, tumblr_nckybtYkVt1sajurvo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8899790

>> No.8899797
File: 233 KB, 1280x853, oldman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8899797

>> No.8899799

>not one piece
garbo

>> No.8899800
File: 134 KB, 900x1200, chels.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8899800

Anyone know if Selected Homme's are legit?

>> No.8899802

>>8899781
Crepe sole and suede upper. They are going to get royally fucked up.

>> No.8899804

>>8899797
Flip up middle age crisis in the dictionary and you'll find this fuccboi

>> No.8899819

>>8899799
Even /fa/'s beloved Saint Laurent Chelseas generally aren't one piece.

>> No.8899826

Anyone know where to get a nice tan suede pair?

>> No.8899988

>>8899781

Does anyone else see Chelsea boots as extremely feminine. The lack of laces is just ugly and makes the silhouette too plain

>> No.8900042

>>8899819
not anymore
the last season had them as one piece
those are grails now

>> No.8900546

>>8899781
where to cop?

>> No.8900560

>>8899988

Get some alpha ones

http://www.cheaney.co.uk/mens-shoe/320/ribble-c-cheaney-chelsea-boots-in-burnished-burgundy-leather#

>> No.8900567
File: 115 KB, 609x607, c4ec618b-8629-4816-8bd4-d3fd30dd6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8900567

>>8899790
yfw thats an american eagle jacket

>> No.8900694
File: 54 KB, 1024x1024, 5553302040_2_1_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8900694

I wanna cop these, but aren't totally sure.

They're Zara, and I really like there look.

>> No.8900745

>>8899988
>too feminine
who the fuck cares? It doesn't matter your gender or sexual orientation, if it looks good and you like it, wear it

>> No.8900755

>>8900694
zara gets too much hate on here
they're not the best quality, but they're the best for the price
either that or thrifting for used nicer ones would be your best bet for being on a budget

>> No.8900766
File: 50 KB, 736x1050, 9126a90bcaccc2c9db1be714b39afadc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8900766

>> No.8900782
File: 248 KB, 952x1428, 41422M047003_5_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8900782

>>8900766

>> No.8900784

>>8900694
they do have an interesting design. i'd say go for it

>> No.8900788
File: 203 KB, 640x640, 1403767811291.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8900788

>>8900782

>> No.8900794

>>8900784
>>8900755
zara pls go

>> No.8901782

>>8899988
>feminine
hahaha oh wow
how do you have an internet connection from the 80s old man

>> No.8901856

>>8900694
Haha last time I posted this I got a thousand "no"s.

>> No.8901886
File: 12 KB, 242x413, bleach.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8901886

are chelsea's proper for Tsukishimacore?

>> No.8901888

>>8901856

here's another no

>> No.8901907

>>8901886
What?

>> No.8901927
File: 1.15 MB, 2107x1405, 2.doc2_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8901927

opinions on dr martens chelseas?

>> No.8901931

>>8900755
>but they're the best for the price
Those shoes look like they'll break within 6 months-1 year of use.

Just get a pair of timberlands chelseas if you want quality.

>> No.8901936

>>8901927
thought they looked like shit, but they look cool here

>> No.8901942
File: 143 KB, 500x750, 1411978247490.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8901942

bless Hedi

>> No.8901943
File: 27 KB, 450x423, timberland chelsea.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8901943

>> No.8901944

Why is /fa/ always one or more years late to the trends?

>> No.8901951
File: 25 KB, 525x350, 10356406_692383567500051_7700764972161532315_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8901951

>>8901936
have a couple of pics where they look pretty decent

i'm hoping that wear and tear will help them look a lot better

>> No.8901953
File: 998 KB, 718x961, Screen Shot 2014-10-05 at 1.00.28 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8901953

>>8901951

>> No.8901954

>>8901944
this trend didnt start in this thread...

>> No.8901957
File: 128 KB, 525x700, 31765533.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8901957

>>8901953

>> No.8901973
File: 374 KB, 950x1360, SLP.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8901973

>>8901953
>>8901957
These are hideous

>>8901942
Mah nigga

>> No.8901990

So what's a good brand for these?

>> No.8901991

So what brands does /fa/ recommend for chelsea boots?
Preferably under $300.

>>8901942
>>8901973
Based Hedi.

>> No.8902000
File: 100 KB, 916x458, Screen Shot 2014-10-05 at 1.13.18 AM 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8902000

>>8901973
there's 2 different versions

the one on the right is the assfucked backwards ugly toe box version

the left is a proper well constructed chelsea

>> No.8902015

>>8900755
Some post the ZIDF picture please

>> No.8902018

>>8902000
whats the name of the one on the left ?

>> No.8902023
File: 190 KB, 722x545, Screen Shot 2014-10-05 at 1.13.18 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8902023

>>8902018
they both go by the exact same name
but it seems to only be available in the UK / europe

if anyone can find a US version please let me know , (item # 15272001)

>> No.8902030

>>8900694
Cant believe they're actually Chelsea's, those look like utter shit

>> No.8902035

>>8900694
They would look much better if the fold wasnt so big and they were higher.

>>8902023
Not to shit on your parade but these look like shit. Mainly because of that sole.

>> No.8902037

>>8901944
Been wearing Chelsea for over a year, does that make uberfa?

>tfw not enough money to afford SLP
Pls forgive me Hedi

>> No.8902042

>>8902035
>what is different taste

i'm not a fan of the typical high heels on chelseas even though that's the 'classic' look of them

i like my shoes to look in-between a mix of casual and dress

>> No.8902043

W2c sub $300 Black chelseas that are nice and slim that will fit under skinny jeans?

>> No.8902046
File: 45 KB, 576x1024, 1411172029655.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8902046

w2c chelseas like pic related, I don't want no slim black shit

>> No.8902057

save and get geobaskets

>> No.8902059

>>8899988
Timberland makes some quite like this

>> No.8902061

>>8902057
is it 2012 again?

>> No.8902102

>>8902046
Maison martin

>> No.8902106
File: 163 KB, 622x900, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8902106

>"Anon why do you dress like Harry Styles!"

FUUUUUUCK MAKE IT STOP MAKE IT STOP!!!

>> No.8902109
File: 83 KB, 500x667, tumblr_n9ie8fBzKn1ro3vwto1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8902109

>>8899988
>mfw I actually wear women's chelsea boots rather than men's

>> No.8902116

>>8902046
bottega veneta

>> No.8902118

>been rocking chelseas since last winter
One pair is black with elastic sides.
Other is brown, zip-up..

>> No.8902122

>>8902118
>Other is brown, zip-up..
then it's not a chelsea

>> No.8902124

>>8902109
you are also a manlet so that's ok being a trap for you

>> No.8902126

>>8902109
good for you

be gender fluid

>> No.8902127

>>8902122
What is it called then? They are made exactly like the black ones, silhouette and everything, but have zips instead of elastic.

>> No.8902137

>>8902127
Zipped chelsea are a thing. >>8902122 doesn't know what he is taking about.

>> No.8902149

>>8902126
>gender fluid
what the shit

>> No.8902160

>>8899781
>wearing suede
>during winter

The will get destroyed on the first day.

>> No.8902165

>>8902149
just some tumblr shit

they have been flooding 4chan latley

>> No.8902168

>>8902149
you must be super skinny and wear girl clothes and tell yourself XIR

also, suck dicks

>> No.8902169

>>8902149

are you an idiot

>> No.8902172

>>8902165
>>8902168
now i'm even more confused, is this also related to gaming or what

>> No.8902184
File: 364 KB, 974x1600, Asymmetrical002.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8902184

>>8902172
no

This is gender fluid
you try to brake gender stereotypes by wearing girly clothes

Look into trunks the trip

>> No.8902189

>>8902184
so they try to break gender stereotypes by wearing clothes attributed to the other gender stereotype? that's fucked up

anyway, better get back to just not giving a fuck about such stuff for clothing

>> No.8902190

Don't forget to report and hide Tumblr posts.

>> No.8902221

>>8902106
>>8902106
>>8902106

this kid may ruin those shoes. srsly

>> No.8902244

>>8902035
>They would look much better if the fold wasnt so big and they were higher.
So if they were normal chelseas? You are missing the point you retarded faggot.

>> No.8902258

>>8902244
No, I am not, you just have a poor taste, and are a representative of a lower (middle is the new lower) class, aren't you? Getting so angry because someone online called out 'your' shoes as ugly (which they are, pretty much anything that isn't boots (and even those are disputable) looks horribly hideous), your choice of words and your thought process which you demonstrated so well, proves you are an aggressive marginal.

You may now degrade further, spouting memes or trying to insult me personally. Please entertain me and the rabble.

>> No.8902280

>>8902258

>pretty much anything by Dr. Martens*

fix

>> No.8902292
File: 474 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_2014-10-05-13-09-04.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8902292

I like these

>> No.8902295

>>8902258
>using brackets within brackets

you sire,,, are not an intellectual at all

quite

>> No.8902298

>>8902258
That was not even me who posted those boots idiot.

Why don't you ease out and go back to your monoshit fit with all the same basic shit that fa told you to wear?

>> No.8902299

>>8902037
>tfw not enough money to afford SLP

so what brands do you wear/recommend?
I'm interested since I'm in the same situation as you

>> No.8902308

>Chelsea's

>> No.8902315

>>8902298
>implying I wear monochrome
>implying I wear basic stuff

Please stop, you will ignite your house!

>> No.8902374

>>8902258
lol this is one of the pettiest posts I have ever seen

>> No.8902824

>>8902106
how immature do you have to be to get turned away from an entire style of footwear because of a pop icon you cancer to fucking society

>> No.8902854
File: 73 KB, 495x499, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8902854

>>8902824
>pop icon

>> No.8903263

Are Topman's Chelseas any good? I haven't much money to spend on a better pair

http://www.topman.com/en/tmuk/product/shoes-and-accessories-1928527/boots-140526/albert-black-leather-look-chelsea-boots-3346512?bi=21&ps=20

>> No.8903272

>>8902258
i hate the austistic meme, but man
that was the most autistic post i've ever seen

>> No.8903322

>>8902258
>middle is the new lower class
my my, a bourgeoisie piece of shit without class analysis, this is something new

>> No.8903341

>>8902122
Retard alert, a Chelsea is a Chelsea because its a boot without laces

>> No.8903422

>>8902292

Reminds me of Uggs.

>> No.8903511

Any tuff looking chelsea's with commando/lug soles? Slim footwear doesn't work for me but I like the practicality of slip ons. And fuck walking in leather or crepe soles in the winter

>> No.8903792
File: 403 KB, 424x549, Screen Shot 2014-08-26 at 4.15.45 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8903792

>> No.8903905

Are skinny jeans an absolute must to go with chelseas? I only got slim fitting ones.

>> No.8903959

Homies I ain't usually the one calling for peace around here but fucking recommende me a solid black pair under three hundred brucks

Also echoing the question are skinny jeans a must

>> No.8903981

>>8903959
Cos

No, but they should be slim

>> No.8904002
File: 37 KB, 600x371, chelsea.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8904002

Grill here. What do we think of chelsea boots with a heel?
What do we think of these in particular?

>> No.8904020

>>8904002
normal ones look much better imo

>> No.8904022

>>8904002
Girls with heels look dumb as hell. Unless you look like Taylor Swift or some shit.

>> No.8904040
File: 160 KB, 1199x936, 1EH121-900_A_54334_4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8904040

>>8904002

The Acne versions have been popular for ages. It's a simple silhouette and it lets itself well to taller heights. I think it loses some of the ease when you go past a Cuban heel, but I understand the appeal.

>> No.8904053
File: 15 KB, 328x400, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8904053

S-should I?

http://m.macys.com/shop/product/calvin-klein-ulysses-chukka-boots?ID=1561176&CategoryID=55637

What are some good boots brands?

>> No.8904055
File: 38 KB, 660x940, 44712338ag_12_n_f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8904055

>>8904040

Wang's Anouck's have been around for forever, too. You can see how the simplicity makes it easy for designers to put their own spin on it, though.

>> No.8904070

>>8904053
no dude look at the sole, what the fuck?

>> No.8904073
File: 60 KB, 728x547, fuq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8904073

nigga

>> No.8904074

>>8904022
For certain fits you need a heel.

>> No.8904081

>>8899799
Why is that so much better?

>> No.8904082

>been wearing Chelsea boots past few years
>this thread happens
>better put them away until the trend dies down so I don't look like a trendwhore

>> No.8904084
File: 135 KB, 1000x667, 1066623.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8904084

>>8904022
bait

>> No.8904101
File: 128 KB, 1500x1500, carnaby-chill-men-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8904101

>>8900694

Basically trying to copy the folded/scrunched thing that Italian brands (Fiorentini + Baker comes to mind immediately) have done for longer and better. Also, unlined leather boots will wrinkle and break in like that, too, and you actually get the fun of doing it yourself.

>> No.8904192

>>8904082

That actually makes you a trendwhore.

>> No.8904398

>>8902106
harry styles is actually /fa though??

>> No.8904427

>>8899781
where to cop?
i like the color and i don't want to go for black/brown chelseas.
want a grey/clay or lighter tones like this one

>> No.8904491

These have a similar aesthetic to the SLP ones
http://www.cosstores.com/nl/Shop/Men/Shoes/Leather_chelsea_boots/46917-22708985.1#c-24479

>> No.8904509
File: 43 KB, 350x610, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8904509

The best

>> No.8904523

>>8900788
would be so much nicer with a different t shirt

>> No.8904544
File: 387 KB, 1920x1440, 2738357-p-4x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8904544

what's your opinion on these /fa/?

>> No.8904602
File: 405 KB, 1920x1440, 2892049-p-4x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8904602

interesting leather detailing on the elastic,

>> No.8904606

>>8903341
so cowboy boots are chelseas as well?

huh.

>> No.8904610

>>8904606
A chelsea is a laceless ankle boot

>> No.8904613
File: 445 KB, 1920x1440, 2825039-p-4x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8904613

2nxtlvl

>> No.8904725

>>8904613
What brand is this? w2c?

>> No.8904782

Is it better to have your pant legs drape over the top of the boot or have the pants rolled up before the top?

>> No.8904889

>>8904782
Matter of taste.
Over looks better most of the time to me.

>> No.8904899

>>8904725
>what is reverse image search

http://www.zappos.com/cole-haan-lunargrand-chelsea

>> No.8904905

>>8904613

Really not digging this. Other Lunargrand styles are so much stronger.

>> No.8904927

>>8904905
what is Lunargrand?
does that have something to do with lunarcore?

>> No.8904932

>>8904927

It's the sneaker-soled styles that Cole Haan does using Nike materials. It's the more fashionable alternative to stuff like the Cole Haan AIR stuff.

>> No.8904948
File: 2.32 MB, 2000x2250, C12019_A.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8904948

>>8904905
yeah i don't like how it looks on that chelsea.
looks much nicer on this combat boot.

>> No.8904969

>>8904782
>not going for tags out mad stacking

>> No.8905124

>>8904509

what brand these b

>> No.8905144

>>8904509
lol why is he wearing rubber boots indoors

>> No.8905451

>>8899781

what's GOAT?

>> No.8905499

>>8905451
Greatest Of all Time.

>> No.8905504

>>8905499

thnx bb

>> No.8905516

literally only manlets wear these high heel shit
PLEASE
FUCK OFF

>> No.8905549

>>8905516
plz

>> No.8905734
File: 70 KB, 720x960, ertwef.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8905734

am i doing good?

>> No.8905789

Expensive but almost all their models look really good in person.

>> No.8905796
File: 49 KB, 300x300, r-m-williams-boots-chestnut-craftsman-boot-i501fcfe29be57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8905796

>>8905789

>> No.8906343
File: 1.66 MB, 1936x2592, IMG_3496.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8906343

APC, Common Projects

>> No.8906348

>>8905516
>stop liking what I don't like!

>> No.8906366

>>8902046
w2c hoodie?

>> No.8906384

>>8904101
How much are these? I'm too lazy too look it up

>> No.8906692

>>8904509
Garbage fit

>> No.8906930

w2c suede chelseas w a rounder toe?

>> No.8906981

>>8899804

He's usually a model for a swedish store; Meadow.

He usually looks badass:
http://www.meadowweb.com/art/tellason-indigo-canvas-jean-jacket.php

Not sure about your pic though, if it's for Meadow or personal.

>> No.8906991
File: 196 KB, 1000x1000, 27-08-2013_redwing_chelsearancherboot_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8906991

>>8906930

Red Wing 2938? They're not suede (because suede is shit), but looks like it.

>> No.8907094

>>8906991
thx for suggestion but im specifically looking for fuzzy suede and also meant round laterally as opposed to vertically.

>> No.8907122

>>8906991
>>8907094
what i mean by fuzzy suede >>8899781
>>8899800
and what i mean in terms of silhouette >>8905429
tho obv not as derby-like