[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 36 KB, 422x563, DU14F4380F09_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8676262 No.8676262[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Do Rick Owens pods/DRKSHDW drop crotch etc. shorts differ much in length when you go up a size? Or is it more just the width. Im usually a 31-32 and 6'4 and mostly all leg and wondering what size to get. Any recommendations?

>> No.8676371

Generally, the rise will stay the same across 44-50 and the inside leg goes up an extra inch if you get size 52 and 54 respectively. So no, at your size there won't really be an increase in length if you go up a size (48 > 50?)

>> No.8676382

>>8676371
Thanks!

>> No.8676395

>>8676262
very informative

>> No.8677049

>>8676371
I'm 6'3 with a 30 waist. what size would you recommend for the right length?

>> No.8677062

>>8677049

You should be worrying about the waist size. Get a small/46.

>> No.8677853

>>8676371
damn great post if this is true.

Can anyone who owns pods speak on how they size. drkshdw or mainline.

I wear medium in drkshdw pants but idk what to get for pods

>> No.8680190

>>8677853
Also I'm confused, whats the design difference between Pods and Swingers. Basically I want to wear them a la Rick himself, but apparently he actually just sags the shit out of them. So either fine?

>> No.8680191

>>8677853
Sorry didn't mean to quote you
>>8676371

>> No.8680212

>>8677049
>>8677062

Agreed. S.

>> No.8680284
File: 124 KB, 239x709, shuckssummerfit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8680284

>>8680212
yo fascist.

If I wear a medium in those puppies pants, what should I get for pods?


I have a fat a$$ and ~32-32.5 inch waist


tyty

>> No.8680477
File: 107 KB, 800x600, 1398312157859.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8680477

So would the only difference between M and L be the waist? would there be no difference in the seat?


thanks

>> No.8680497

>>8680477
i'd think as the size increase there would be small differences but i don't think there would be anything too major in legnth

>> No.8680511
File: 2.25 MB, 3264x2448, photo 2 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8680511

>>8680497
All I'm concerned about is the width of the leg being large enough. I guess if I'm an M in other drkshdw pants, these shorts should fit ok.


Just worried because this is the pic the seller sent to me.

I'm hoping that shape is just down to posture/unfortunate angle

>> No.8680675

>>8680190
Swingers have a less exaggerated drop crotch, and angled zipper back pockets instead of cargo pant type back pockets

>> No.8680945
File: 18 KB, 480x360, mohawke centerzips.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8680945

>>8680511
>>8680477
bump

>> No.8681051

>>8680945
Those sellers photos are fucking awful. Some people must hate money with the way they try to attract buyers. I don't think that's an intrinsic quality of the shorts. They look really good in Shucks photo and I just got a pair of silk/cotton swingers (mainline) and they're fantastic so id cop. You'll be able to resell for close to 100% what you pay anyway

>> No.8681232

>>8681051
Probs just gonna cop them. Just worried cause I do have p wide hips and shit.

Wish me luck :)

>> No.8681240

>>8676262
Lol is that how dyeldave's shorts are supposed to fit? His almost reach down to his ankles