[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 607 KB, 1536x1687, 1408033742401.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8660256 No.8660256 [Reply] [Original]

Are there any reasonably priced, Tapered Cargos out there?

>similar to the ones in the picture

>> No.8660261

>cargo pants

>> No.8660267 [DELETED] 

>>8660261
thanks for your input

>> No.8660271

>>8660256
Define reasonably priced.

Most likely not.
http://www.ralphlauren.com/product/index.jsp?productId=42619996&utm_term=ralph+lauren+cargo+pants&002=2502554&007=Search&025=c&006=42535025717&005=1067397862&004=9828705677&utm_source=PaidSearch&utm_campaign=Google-B-Ralph+Lauren-Exact&utm_medium=Google&gclid=Cj0KEQjwgryfBRDn7cvY-pOit4cBEiQAB3nTblFkigQ_UxptUK5DRPVGtvAX1QL5-rrhx5I69UyIxJIaAsz18P8HAQ&parentPage=family

>> No.8660276
File: 1.99 MB, 3264x2448, IMG_20140729_184746.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8660276

>>8660261
they are a great receptacle for meats

>> No.8660283

>>8660267
You do know he was making fun of you, right?

>> No.8660288

http://europebound.com/store/

get them tapered yourself

>> No.8660289

>>8660283
but why would someone on the internet make fun of me??
>>8660271
Those are actually surprising nice for ralph lauren

>> No.8660301

>>8660289
http://www.maharishistore.com/product/Brand_2057OFFICIALCUSTOMCARGOPANTS_2656_20_0_0.html

Another option for you, naive anon. Probably does not fit your description of "reasonably priced," either.

>> No.8660309

>>8660301
Thanks, man. They're alright, kinda frumpy looking though.. Why would you assume they didn't conform to my description of "reasonably priced"?

>> No.8660317

>>8660309
90% of /fa/ posters are poorfags that really can't afford most of the shit posted here. Especially those in the "tech" realm.

That being said, I have no idea how you could think they are frumpy, but think the OP's pants look fine.

>> No.8660324

>>8660317
I agree 100% with the first statement

I meant "flimsy", It's been a long day

>> No.8660438

bump

pls respond