[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 138 KB, 717x683, antihigh_logo_web2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8519084 No.8519084 [Reply] [Original]

Official website of the AntiHigh movement.
No more high waisted anything!
share to bring awareness. this has to stop.

>> No.8519088

they are terrible

>> No.8519094

I feel high waists aren't something that's objectively bad. Just a case of girls can't dress and make them look terrible

>> No.8519101

>>8519094
Doesn't that go for most fashion rules though? They can be broken if you know what you're doing. Most people obviously don't.

>> No.8519102

worse fad ever.

>> No.8519111

why are high waists bad?
also why would u post this on a mostly male forum

>> No.8519114

They aren't /fa/ but there are some girls who I prefer to see in high waisted shit. It makes their ass look like da bomb

>> No.8519117

all pants should be highwaisted

>> No.8519123

>>8519101
Usually yea. But idk if I'd say no high waists should be a rule. Maybe if I could spot it, but I'm still not sure what it is I like & dislike about them at the same time.

>> No.8519127

looks like granny panties or a large diaper. definitely not sexy.

>> No.8519131

>>8519127
why does a girl have to look sexy

>> No.8519132

>>8519131
and who says large diapers aren't sexy?

>> No.8519138

>>8519132
this guy>>8519127

>> No.8519145

>>8519131
thats what theyre for
wtf

>> No.8519148

>>8519145
/ttotm/

>> No.8519152
File: 22 KB, 320x225, sofa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8519152

so /fa

>> No.8519160
File: 50 KB, 450x600, trunksdiaper.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8519160

>>8519132
Diapers are 2nxtlvl

>> No.8519176

In the future we will all be incontinent so we might ass well make some eye pleasing piss catchers.

>> No.8519190
File: 297 KB, 920x1226, girls-jean-shorts-920-25.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8519190

>> No.8520458

>>8519084
Ugly fatass detected.

Like everything else, high-waisted shorts look great on people who are fit and trim and look like shit on people who are fat overweight slobs and people who don't know how to wear clothes.

>> No.8520503
File: 82 KB, 670x894, 1405872670754.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8520503

>> No.8521308

>2014
>not wanting to cover your uterus like a civilized being

>> No.8521379

I think high waisted pants can really compliment a feminine figure outside of the rail thin look. Not to say everyone should wear them, but they're very attractive on large hips.

>> No.8521385

>>8519190
fuggg

>> No.8521393

>>8521379
this

what's actually wrong, though, is girls who are okay with wearing high-waisted pants or shorts, but wear low-cut panties. What the fuck is wrong with them?

>> No.8521561

>>8519111
fat tumblr fashionistas rely on them as a crutch so hide their rolls. Like a denim girdle.

>> No.8521689

>>8520503
Arya pulls it off

>> No.8521711

high rise mens trousers master race reporting in

>> No.8523190

>>8521689
not really
she rarely pulls anything off

>> No.8523934

>>8519117

This

>> No.8524297

>high waisted skirts 80% of the time
>mid rise shorts/pants 20% of the time

>> No.8524304

>>8521561
fat tumblr fashionistas are bad; not high-waist jeans

>> No.8524305

>>8520503
fuck

>> No.8524310

>>8520503
fuck

you can see her nipples

>> No.8524416

>>8519117
As a guy, I'd really rock some high-waisted slim jeans

>> No.8524431

>>8521711
Pls post a fit, pls

>> No.8524440

>>8521561
>fat tumblr fashionistas rely on them
What if you're not a "fat tumblr fashionista", but a tall, stick thin, model-tier fashionista with a tiny waist?

High waited stuff is lovely, but it has to be worn right (and by the right people).

>> No.8524448

>>8524440
Well, at least here in Germany I've never ever seen a girl pull 'em off and they always looked horrible.

>> No.8524464

>>8519131
what other purpose does she serve?

>> No.8524470

>>8524440
stick thin is bad too. You just gotta be reasonably fit and have nice curves (as opposed to fat).

>> No.8524482
File: 441 KB, 500x375, tumblr_n3j53b7bvc1qc2ixgo1_500.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8524482

>>8519084
i don't think it's necessarily a bad thing, especially with heavier denim which would prob. be love handley on some girls

>> No.8524514
File: 235 KB, 384x481, Bildschirmfoto 2014-07-21 um 16.43.18.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8524514

>>8524482
I prefer them them when they're not momlike but soft and touchable. e.g. aa easy jeans.

stiff denim is hard and fits boxy and momlike. is that heavy denim in the picture because that fits well for heavy denim

>> No.8524523

>>8524514
I can see low-cut panty marks on the left-hand girl.
2/10 fucking dropped.

>> No.8524530

>hating on highwaist
homos
looks qt as fuck on a chick with the right bod

>> No.8524535

Nothing wrong with high-waisted bottoms

>> No.8524553

For once, I'm proud of you, /fa/.

>> No.8524567

>>8519102
>>8519088
>>8519127
pleb

>> No.8524569

>>8520503
Arya looks like she can put up a good fuck.
How old is she?

>> No.8524570

>>8524448
I just knew you must be from Germany
boys here are always so convetional and hate seing new stuff on girls

>> No.8524572

>>8524530
this.
fuck off you virginfags

>> No.8524576

Official response of the ProHigh movement.

High waste is love, high waste is life.

It's sexy as fuck. Deal with it.

>> No.8524610

>>8524576
Prohigh master race

>> No.8525594

>>8520503
who is this

>> No.8525688

>>8524482
source

>> No.8525763

I think your thread backfired, OP.

>> No.8525810

>>8519084
> all those british club cunts

>> No.8525825

>>8524610
Sieg high!

>> No.8525831
File: 300 KB, 700x1050, 6a00d8345282b769e201901e8619d3970b-700w.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8525831

are you out of your mind OP

maybe you've only seen fatties in high waisted hotpants

>> No.8525852

>>8521393
I'm not following you here, panties are not a fashion accessory

>> No.8525868

>>8519084
i think the actual trend now is for grills to hike them up so their butt cheeks are perfectly outlined and they give themselves a wedgie
so many qts at p4k did that.

>> No.8525899

>>8525852
First off, that's fucking wrong.
Secondly, the argument grills often spout when asked why they won't even try high-cut underwear or bikinis is "b-but they look like granny panties" which is also wrong.
So when a girl actually has the balls to try high-waisted pants or shorts, that actually look like mom jeans and granny panties respectively, what's holding them from wearing high-cut masterrace underwear?

explain this, atheists.

>> No.8525915

>>8525899
+1

>> No.8526171

>>8525831
thats a skirt, way fucking different than high waisted pants.

I hate high waist pants and shorts on women, low cut looks a thousand times better

>> No.8526184

>>8525899
Girls down wear their underwear for you. They wear it to feel sexy for the guy they are actually going to be taking them off for.

Besides, plenty of "burlesque" girls wear high waisted lingerie too

>> No.8526198

>>8526184
fucking, I meant girls DONT not down

>> No.8526210

>>8526184
they wear high-waist, low-cut lingerie, that's entirely different.

So what you're saying, is, simply that all the guys who get laid are so entirely against high-cut underwear that their gfs will sense it and not even try it even once. Right?

>> No.8526230
File: 93 KB, 748x1022, T2rRCQXc0bXXXXXXXX_!!812642519_original.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8526230

>>8526184
okay let me show you something
this is high-waist, low-cut. Aka "granny panties". this is what "burlesque" girls wear.
It looks like shit and it's not what I'm talking about.

>> No.8526246

>>8526230

Burlesque grills giv me the bonerz tho

>> No.8526260
File: 289 KB, 500x600, first.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8526260

>>8526184
this is high-cut/high-leg.
This is what I'm talking about. I don't even understand how people can mistake them for these >>8526230, let alone prefer anything low-cut (be it high-waist or not) to them.

>> No.8526270

>>8526246
well they're supposed to look like strippers so obviously that's intentional.

>> No.8526273

>>8526246
Untill they come of and everything blobs out like a landslide.

>> No.8526283

>>8521561
At last I truly see

>> No.8526292

>>8526273
Blame the fat acceptance movement for propagating noxious misconceptions about beauty standards in the 50s and telling fatasses that they will be sexy if they wear clothes from that period.

>> No.8526310

>>8526210
high rise panties can only be worn with high rise pants
low cut can be worn with everything.

and no, panties are still not a fashion accessory. a sex accessory at most, but nobody buys panties to make a fashion statement.

>> No.8526325

>>8526310
Well at least fat tumblrites do.
But they won't wear these. Thankfully.

And I would argue that they were, in the early 2000s, worn with low-waist pants. Skanky as fuck, though.

>> No.8526331

>>8526310
>low cut can be worn with everything.
but underneath high-waisted jeans or short it's just silly and underwhelming.

>> No.8526353

>>8526325
I remember when my primary school class saw a girl on a park bench with a giant lacy pink whale tail

all of us kids started making fun of her because her undies were showing kek

>> No.8526368

>>8526331
how? They are not visible unless it's a fucked up fit with panty lines

>> No.8526391

>preferring low rise jeans
Is this 2001

>> No.8526394

>>8526368
Well they're visible when you take off your pants.
And if panties are a sex accessories, so are the overwhelming majority of shorts and jeans worn by girls; they're always designed to look sexy so don't give me that excuse. If you pick sexy jeans, why not sexy underwear?

>> No.8526407

>>8519084
Girls like high waist because they think it makes the waist look small. It just makes the ass look huge

>> No.8526416

>>8526407
How is that not a good thing?

>> No.8526418

>>8526394
I don't think many tumblirites wear high rise to look hot, they just try alternative and vintage cuts for fashionz

>> No.8526443

>>8526418
No, but most girls pick their jeans based on how sexy it makes them look.

Or maybe they're completely oblivious and delusional.

Shit, that would explain everything.

>> No.8526446

>>8526416
>implying girls with large waists should have even huger ass

>> No.8526467

>>8526446
let's please stop taking fatties into account. they shouldn't exist in the first place so they're not worth mentioning. They're irrelevant.